270 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15933107)
1. A strategy to qualify the performance of radiographic monitors.
Gutierrez D; Monnin P; Valley JF; Verdun FR
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):192-7. PubMed ID: 15933107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Display monitors for digital medical imaging.
Andriole KP
J Am Coll Radiol; 2005 Jun; 2(6):543-6. PubMed ID: 17411873
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of display performance for medical imaging systems: executive summary of AAPM TG18 report.
Samei E; Badano A; Chakraborty D; Compton K; Cornelius C; Corrigan K; Flynn MJ; Hemminger B; Hangiandreou N; Johnson J; Moxley-Stevens DM; Pavlicek W; Roehrig H; Rutz L; Shepard J; Uzenoff RA; Wang J; Willis CE;
Med Phys; 2005 Apr; 32(4):1205-25. PubMed ID: 15895604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Suspension criteria for image monitors and viewing boxes.
Tingberg A
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Feb; 153(2):230-5. PubMed ID: 23188811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Implementation of quality assurance in diagnostic radiology in Bosnia and Herzegovina (Republic of Srpska).
Bosnjak J; Ciraj-Bjelac O; Strbac B
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):249-52. PubMed ID: 18283063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A software tool for increased efficiency in observer performance studies in radiology.
Börjesson S; Håkansson M; Båth M; Kheddache S; Svensson S; Tingberg A; Grahn A; Ruschin M; Hemdal B; Mattsson S; Månsson LG
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):45-52. PubMed ID: 15933080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A conceptual optimisation strategy for radiography in a digital environment.
Båth M; Håkansson M; Hansson J; Månsson LG
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):230-5. PubMed ID: 15933113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Image browsing in slow medical liquid crystal displays.
Liang H; Park S; Gallas BD; Myers KJ; Badano A
Acad Radiol; 2008 Mar; 15(3):370-82. PubMed ID: 18280935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Grayscale calibration and quality assurance of diagnostic monitors in a PACS system.
Crespi A; Bonsignore F; Paruccini N; Macchi I
Radiol Med; 2006 Sep; 111(6):863-75. PubMed ID: 16896553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Toward clinically relevant standardization of image quality.
Samei E; Rowberg A; Avraham E; Cornelius C
J Digit Imaging; 2004 Dec; 17(4):271-8. PubMed ID: 15551103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessment of PACS display systems.
Aldrich JE; Rutledge JD
J Digit Imaging; 2005 Dec; 18(4):287-95. PubMed ID: 16094505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A filmless radiology teaching conference system for pertinent displaying and image searching.
Abe K; Narata M; Tanaka I; Takahashi M; Igarashi A; Sasaki T; Matsuyama K; Tohi N; Kosuda S
J Digit Imaging; 2009 Dec; 22(6):598-604. PubMed ID: 18196340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Running medical image analysis on GridFactory desktop grid.
Orellana F; Niinimaki M; Zhou X; Rosendahl P; Müller H; Waananen A
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2009; 147():13-21. PubMed ID: 19593040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Image quality assurance of soft copy display systems.
Seto E; Ursani A; Cafazzo JA; Rossos PG; Easty AC
J Digit Imaging; 2005 Dec; 18(4):280-6. PubMed ID: 15988625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Digital radiology display must fit variety of needs.
Honeyman J; Frost M; Staab E
Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1994 Feb; 16(2):67-72. PubMed ID: 10146655
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Image quality and dose management in digital radiography: a new paradigm for optimisation.
Busch HP; Faulkner K
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):143-7. PubMed ID: 16461521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Variations in performance of LCDs are still evident after DICOM gray-scale standard display calibration.
Lowe JM; Brennan PC; Evanoff MG; McEntee MF
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Jul; 195(1):181-7. PubMed ID: 20566814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Workstation scheme and implementation for a medical imaging information system.
Tao Y; Miao J
Chin Med J (Engl); 2003 May; 116(5):654-7. PubMed ID: 12875671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessment of flat panel LCD primary class display performance based on AAPM TG 18 acceptance protocol.
Jung H; Kim HJ; Kang WS; Yoo SK; Fujioka K; Hasegawa M; Samei E
Med Phys; 2004 Jul; 31(7):2155-64. PubMed ID: 15305470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Soft-copy reading in digital mammography of mass: diagnostic performance of a 5-megapixel cathode ray tube monitor versus a 3-megapixel liquid crystal display monitor in a diagnostic setting.
Uematsu T; Kasami M
Acta Radiol; 2008 Jul; 49(6):623-9. PubMed ID: 18568553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
