357 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15933110)
1. Assessment of radiographic screen-film systems: a comparison between the use of a microdensitometer and a drum film digitiser.
Verdun FR; Pachoud M; Bergmann D; Buhr E
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):208-13. PubMed ID: 15933110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of the performance of modern screen-film and digital mammography systems.
Monnin P; Gutierrez D; Bulling S; Lepori D; Valley JF; Verdun FR
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Jun; 50(11):2617-31. PubMed ID: 15901958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical evaluation of a new set of image quality criteria for mammography.
Grahn A; Hemdal B; Andersson I; Ruschin M; Thilander-Klang A; Börjesson S; Tingberg A; Mattsson S; Håkansson M; Båth M; Månsson LG; Medin J; Wanninger F; Panzer W
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):389-94. PubMed ID: 15933143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Digital mammography, computer-aided diagnosis, and telemammography.
Feig SA; Yaffe MJ
Radiol Clin North Am; 1995 Nov; 33(6):1205-30. PubMed ID: 7480666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Recent advances in screen-film mammography.
Haus AG
Radiol Clin North Am; 1987 Sep; 25(5):913-28. PubMed ID: 3306773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. AEC set-up optimisation with computed radiography imaging.
Mazzocchi S; Belli G; Busoni S; Gori C; Menchi I; Salucci P; Taddeucci A; Zatelli G
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):169-73. PubMed ID: 16461503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of the imaging characteristics of the new Kodak Hyper Speed G film with the current T-MAT G/RA film and the CR 9000 system.
Monnin P; Gutierrez D; Bulling S; Lepori D; Verdun FR
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Oct; 50(19):4541-52. PubMed ID: 16177488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessment and optimisation of the image quality of chest-radiography systems.
Redlich U; Hoeschen C; Doehring W
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):264-8. PubMed ID: 15933119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A model for image formation and image quality prediction in diagnostic radiology.
Kandarakis I; Cavouras D; Koutsourakis C; Triantis D; Bakas A; Panayiotakis G; Nomicos C
Stud Health Technol Inform; 1997; 43 Pt B():517-21. PubMed ID: 10179719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Signal-to-noise properties of mammographic film-screen systems.
Nishikawa RM; Yaffe MJ
Med Phys; 1985; 12(1):32-9. PubMed ID: 3974523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Examinations of rare-earth film-screen-systems for image detectors in mammography (author's transl)].
Weberling R
Rontgenblatter; 1979 Mar; 32(3):109-16. PubMed ID: 432483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. For mammography, it's digital vs. screen-film.
D'Orsi CJ; Karellas A
Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1999 Nov; Suppl Digital():D16-8. PubMed ID: 10724730
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Film-screen digital radiography.
Schwenker RP; Eger H
Radiography; 1985; 51(598):233-5. PubMed ID: 4048409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of breast masses using digitized images versus screen-film mammography.
Liang Z; Du X; Liu J; Yao X; Yang Y; Li K
Acta Radiol; 2008 Jul; 49(6):618-22. PubMed ID: 18568552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A conceptual optimisation strategy for radiography in a digital environment.
Båth M; Håkansson M; Hansson J; Månsson LG
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):230-5. PubMed ID: 15933113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Image quality parameters of film-screen systems].
Hoeschen D
Rontgenblatter; 1987 Jun; 40(6):193-9. PubMed ID: 3616429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison between objective and subjective image quality measurements for a full field digital mammography system.
Marshall NW
Phys Med Biol; 2006 May; 51(10):2441-63. PubMed ID: 16675862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Characteristics of screen-film systems for mammography in relation to a diverse modality of treatment].
Rosselli Del Turco M; Milano F; Giani M; Bravetti P
Radiol Med; 1988 Apr; 75(4):390-4. PubMed ID: 3375482
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Digital detectors in mammography. A technological overview.
Dhaenens F
JBR-BTR; 2000 Apr; 83(2):84-7. PubMed ID: 10859905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [The effect of technical parameters on diagnostic quality].
Brandt GA
Aktuelle Radiol; 1991 Jan; 1(1):16-22. PubMed ID: 2018801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
