These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

310 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15933114)

  • 1. Optimising automatic exposure control in computed radiography and the impact on patient dose.
    Doyle P; Gentle D; Martin CJ
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):236-9. PubMed ID: 15933114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. AEC set-up optimisation with computed radiography imaging.
    Mazzocchi S; Belli G; Busoni S; Gori C; Menchi I; Salucci P; Taddeucci A; Zatelli G
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):169-73. PubMed ID: 16461503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dose optimisation in computed radiography.
    Schreiner-Karoussou A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):139-42. PubMed ID: 16461522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Computed radiography as a gamma ray detector--dose response and applications.
    O'Keeffe DS; McLeod RW
    Phys Med Biol; 2004 Aug; 49(16):3559-72. PubMed ID: 15446787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A framework for optimising the radiographic technique in digital X-ray imaging.
    Samei E; Dobbins JT; Lo JY; Tornai MP
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):220-9. PubMed ID: 15933112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Calibrating automatic exposure control devices for digital radiography.
    Doyle P; Martin CJ
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Nov; 51(21):5475-85. PubMed ID: 17047264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluating radiographic parameters for mobile chest computed radiography: phantoms, image quality and effective dose.
    Rill LN; Brateman L; Arreola M
    Med Phys; 2003 Oct; 30(10):2727-35. PubMed ID: 14596311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dose-image quality optimisation in digital chest radiography.
    Doyle P; Martin CJ; Gentle D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):269-72. PubMed ID: 15933120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Does digital imaging decrease patient dose? A pilot study and review of the literature.
    Neofotistou V; Tsapaki V; Kottou S; Schreiner-Karoussou A; Vano E
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):204-10. PubMed ID: 16464833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Varied tube potential with constant effective dose at lumbar spine radiography using a flat-panel digital detector.
    Geijer H; Persliden J
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):240-5. PubMed ID: 15933115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of computed radiography and film/screen combination using a contrast-detail phantom.
    Lu ZF; Nickoloff EL; So JC; Dutta AK
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2003; 4(1):91-8. PubMed ID: 12540823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Image quality and dose management in digital radiography: a new paradigm for optimisation.
    Busch HP; Faulkner K
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):143-7. PubMed ID: 16461521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of x-ray tube potential on image quality and patient dose for lumbar spine computed radiography examinations.
    Brindhaban A; Al Khalifah K; Al Wathiqi G; Al Ostath H
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2005 Dec; 28(4):216-22. PubMed ID: 16506618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. 3-Dimensional rotational X-ray imaging, 3D-RX: image quality and patient dose simulation for optimisation studies.
    Kroon JN
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):341-9. PubMed ID: 15933134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Advances in computed radiography systems and their physical imaging characteristics.
    Cowen AR; Davies AG; Kengyelics SM
    Clin Radiol; 2007 Dec; 62(12):1132-41. PubMed ID: 17981160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Chest radiography: a comparison of image quality and effective dose using four digital systems.
    Pascoal A; Lawinski CP; Mackenzie A; Tabakov S; Lewis CA
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):273-7. PubMed ID: 15933121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The contrast-detail behaviour of a photostimulable phosphor based computed radiography system.
    Marshall NW; Faulkner K; Busch HP; Lehmann KJ
    Phys Med Biol; 1994 Dec; 39(12):2289-303. PubMed ID: 15551554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Retrospective patient dose analysis of a digital radiography system in routine clinical use.
    Schuncke A; Neitzel U
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):131-4. PubMed ID: 15933094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An examination of automatic exposure control regimes for two digital radiography systems.
    Marshall NW
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Aug; 54(15):4645-70. PubMed ID: 19590115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Scatter-to-primary ratio and absorption efficiency in screen-film and computed radiography systems.
    McLean D; Gray JE
    Eur J Radiol; 1996 Feb; 21(3):212-6. PubMed ID: 8777912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.