576 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15933120)
1. Dose-image quality optimisation in digital chest radiography.
Doyle P; Martin CJ; Gentle D
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):269-72. PubMed ID: 15933120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluating radiographic parameters for mobile chest computed radiography: phantoms, image quality and effective dose.
Rill LN; Brateman L; Arreola M
Med Phys; 2003 Oct; 30(10):2727-35. PubMed ID: 14596311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A framework for optimising the radiographic technique in digital X-ray imaging.
Samei E; Dobbins JT; Lo JY; Tornai MP
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):220-9. PubMed ID: 15933112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Optimisation of image plate radiography with respect to tube voltage.
Tingberg A; Sjöström D
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):286-93. PubMed ID: 15933123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Distributions of scatter-to-primary and signal-to-noise ratios per pixel in digital chest imaging.
Ullman G; Sandborg M; Dance DR; Hunt R; Alm Carlsson G
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):355-8. PubMed ID: 15933136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Towards optimization in digital chest radiography using Monte Carlo modelling.
Ullman G; Sandborg M; Dance DR; Hunt RA; Alm Carlsson G
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Jun; 51(11):2729-43. PubMed ID: 16723762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment and optimisation of the image quality of chest-radiography systems.
Redlich U; Hoeschen C; Doehring W
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):264-8. PubMed ID: 15933119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of scatter rejection and low-contrast performance of scan equalization digital radiography (SEDR), slot-scan digital radiography, and full-field digital radiography systems for chest phantom imaging.
Liu X; Shaw CC; Lai CJ; Wang T
Med Phys; 2011 Jan; 38(1):23-33. PubMed ID: 21361171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Nodule detection in digital chest radiography: effect of system noise.
Håkansson M; Båth M; Börjesson S; Kheddache S; Johnsson AA; Månsson LG
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):97-101. PubMed ID: 15933088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Correlation between the signal-to-noise ratio improvement factor (KSNR) and clinical image quality for chest imaging with a computed radiography system.
Moore CS; Wood TJ; Saunderson JR; Beavis AW
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Dec; 60(23):9047-58. PubMed ID: 26540441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Application of contrast-to-noise ratio in optimizing beam quality for digital chest radiography: comparison of experimental measurements and theoretical simulations.
Doyle P; Martin CJ; Gentle D
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Jun; 51(11):2953-70. PubMed ID: 16723777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. ITERATIVE SCATTER CORRECTION FOR GRID-LESS BEDSIDE CHEST RADIOGRAPHY: PERFORMANCE FOR A CHEST PHANTOM.
Mentrup D; Jockel S; Menser B; Neitzel U
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Jun; 169(1-4):308-12. PubMed ID: 26487750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of reduced exposure on computed radiography: comparison of nodule detection accuracy with conventional and asymmetric screen-film radiographs of a chest phantom.
Kimme-Smith C; Aberle DR; Sayre JW; Hart EM; Greaves SM; Brown K; Young DA; Deseran MD; Johnson T; Johnson SL
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Aug; 165(2):269-73. PubMed ID: 7618538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Schemes for the optimization of chest radiography using a computer model of the patient and x-ray imaging system.
Sandborg M; McVey G; Dance DR; Alm Carlsson G
Med Phys; 2001 Oct; 28(10):2007-19. PubMed ID: 11695764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Method of simulating dose reduction for digital radiographic systems.
Båth M; Håkansson M; Tingberg A; Månsson LG
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):253-9. PubMed ID: 15933117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Optimising automatic exposure control in computed radiography and the impact on patient dose.
Doyle P; Gentle D; Martin CJ
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):236-9. PubMed ID: 15933114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Anthropomorphic versus geometric chest phantoms: a comparison of scatter properties.
Baydush AH; Ghem WC; Floyd CE
Med Phys; 2000 May; 27(5):894-7. PubMed ID: 10841391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An optimisation strategy in a digital environment applied to neonatal chest imaging.
Hansson J; Båth M; Håkansson M; Grundin H; Bjurklint E; Orvestad P; Kjellström A; Boström H; Jönsson M; Jonsson K; Månsson LG
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):278-85. PubMed ID: 15933122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Nodule detection in digital chest radiography: summary of the RADIUS chest trial.
Håkansson M; Båth M; Börjesson S; Kheddache S; Grahn A; Ruschin M; Tingberg A; Mattsson S; Månsson LG
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):114-20. PubMed ID: 15933091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Investigation of optimum X-ray beam tube voltage and filtration for chest radiography with a computed radiography system.
Moore CS; Beavis AW; Saunderson JR
Br J Radiol; 2008 Oct; 81(970):771-7. PubMed ID: 18662964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
