These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15933124)

  • 1. The influence of patient thickness and imaging system on patient dose and physical image quality in digital chest imaging.
    Ullman G; Sandborg M; Dance DR; Hunt R; Alm Carlsson G
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):294-7. PubMed ID: 15933124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Towards optimization in digital chest radiography using Monte Carlo modelling.
    Ullman G; Sandborg M; Dance DR; Hunt RA; Alm Carlsson G
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Jun; 51(11):2729-43. PubMed ID: 16723762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of clinical and physical measures of image quality in chest and pelvis computed radiography at different tube voltages.
    Sandborg M; Tingberg A; Ullman G; Dance DR; Alm Carlsson G
    Med Phys; 2006 Nov; 33(11):4169-75. PubMed ID: 17153395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluating radiographic parameters for mobile chest computed radiography: phantoms, image quality and effective dose.
    Rill LN; Brateman L; Arreola M
    Med Phys; 2003 Oct; 30(10):2727-35. PubMed ID: 14596311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Distributions of scatter-to-primary and signal-to-noise ratios per pixel in digital chest imaging.
    Ullman G; Sandborg M; Dance DR; Hunt R; Alm Carlsson G
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):355-8. PubMed ID: 15933136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dose-image quality optimisation in digital chest radiography.
    Doyle P; Martin CJ; Gentle D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):269-72. PubMed ID: 15933120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dose-image quality study in digital chest radiography using Monte Carlo simulation.
    Correa SC; Souza EM; Silva AX; Lopes RT; Yoriyaz H
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2008 Sep; 66(9):1213-7. PubMed ID: 18308576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A framework for optimising the radiographic technique in digital X-ray imaging.
    Samei E; Dobbins JT; Lo JY; Tornai MP
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):220-9. PubMed ID: 15933112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Nodule detection in digital chest radiography: effect of system noise.
    Håkansson M; Båth M; Börjesson S; Kheddache S; Johnsson AA; Månsson LG
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):97-101. PubMed ID: 15933088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Analysis of image quality in digital chest imaging.
    De Hauwere A; Bacher K; Smeets P; Verstraete K; Thierens H
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):174-7. PubMed ID: 16461499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Schemes for the optimization of chest radiography using a computer model of the patient and x-ray imaging system.
    Sandborg M; McVey G; Dance DR; Alm Carlsson G
    Med Phys; 2001 Oct; 28(10):2007-19. PubMed ID: 11695764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dose reduction in patients undergoing chest imaging: digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography versus conventional film-screen radiography and phosphor-based computed radiography.
    Bacher K; Smeets P; Bonnarens K; De Hauwere A; Verstraete K; Thierens H
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Oct; 181(4):923-9. PubMed ID: 14500203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Nodule detection in digital chest radiography: summary of the RADIUS chest trial.
    Håkansson M; Båth M; Börjesson S; Kheddache S; Grahn A; Ruschin M; Tingberg A; Mattsson S; Månsson LG
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):114-20. PubMed ID: 15933091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Chest radiography with a flat-panel detector: image quality with dose reduction after copper filtration.
    Hamer OW; Sirlin CB; Strotzer M; Borisch I; Zorger N; Feuerbach S; Völk M
    Radiology; 2005 Nov; 237(2):691-700. PubMed ID: 16192324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Optimisation of image plate radiography with respect to tube voltage.
    Tingberg A; Sjöström D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):286-93. PubMed ID: 15933123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Varied tube potential with constant effective dose at lumbar spine radiography using a flat-panel digital detector.
    Geijer H; Persliden J
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):240-5. PubMed ID: 15933115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Optimal beam quality for chest computed radiography.
    Oda N; Nakata H; Murakami S; Terada K; Nakamura K; Yoshida A
    Invest Radiol; 1996 Mar; 31(3):126-31. PubMed ID: 8675419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A search for improved technique factors in paediatric fluoroscopy.
    Tapiovaara MJ; Sandborg M; Dance DR
    Phys Med Biol; 1999 Feb; 44(2):537-59. PubMed ID: 10070800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Demonstration of correlations between clinical and physical image quality measures in chest and lumbar spine screen-film radiography.
    Sandborg M; Tingberg A; Dance DR; Lanhede B; Almén A; McVey G; Sund P; Kheddache S; Besjakov J; Mattsson S; Månsson LG; Alm Carlsson G
    Br J Radiol; 2001 Jun; 74(882):520-8. PubMed ID: 11459731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Correlation between the signal-to-noise ratio improvement factor (KSNR) and clinical image quality for chest imaging with a computed radiography system.
    Moore CS; Wood TJ; Saunderson JR; Beavis AW
    Phys Med Biol; 2015 Dec; 60(23):9047-58. PubMed ID: 26540441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.