These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15933127)

  • 1. Automatic tube-current modulation in CT--a comparison between different solutions.
    Althén JN
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):308-12. PubMed ID: 15933127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of automatic tube current modulation on radiation dose and image quality for low tube voltage multidetector row CT angiography: phantom study.
    Schindera ST; Nelson RC; Yoshizumi T; Toncheva G; Nguyen G; DeLong DM; Szucs-Farkas Z
    Acad Radiol; 2009 Aug; 16(8):997-1002. PubMed ID: 19409820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effective dose and image quality evaluations of an automatic CT tube current modulation system with an anthropomorphic phantom.
    Rampado O; Marchisio F; Izzo A; Garelli E; Bianchi CC; Gandini G; Ropolo R
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Oct; 72(1):181-7. PubMed ID: 18692337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison between 3-D and z-axis automatic tube current modulation technique in multidetector-row CT.
    Matsubara K; Koshida K; Suzuki M; Tsujii H; Yamamoto T; Matsui O
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 128(1):106-11. PubMed ID: 17681961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of different adaptation strengths on image quality and radiation dose using Siemens Care Dose 4D.
    Söderberg M; Gunnarsson M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):173-9. PubMed ID: 20231163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Optimisation of image plate radiography with respect to tube voltage.
    Tingberg A; Sjöström D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):286-93. PubMed ID: 15933123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Automatic exposure control in computed tomography--an evaluation of systems from different manufacturers.
    Söderberg M; Gunnarsson M
    Acta Radiol; 2010 Jul; 51(6):625-34. PubMed ID: 20429764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of dose metrics and radiation risk models when optimizing CT x-ray tube voltage.
    Huda W; Ogden KM; Khorasani MR
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Sep; 53(17):4719-32. PubMed ID: 18695298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of X-ray tube parameters, iodine concentration, and patient size on image quality in pulmonary computed tomography angiography: a chest-phantom-study.
    Szucs-Farkas Z; Verdun FR; von Allmen G; Mini RL; Vock P
    Invest Radiol; 2008 Jun; 43(6):374-81. PubMed ID: 18496042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Improvement in banding artefacts in four-dimensional computed tomography for radiotherapy planning.
    Mori S; Endo M; Asakura H
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Oct; 51(20):5231-44. PubMed ID: 17019035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Noninvasive imaging of the coronary arteries using a 64-row multidetector CT scanner: initial clinical experience and radiation dose concerns.
    Francone M; Napoli A; Carbone I; Cavacece M; Nardis PG; Lanciotti K; Visconti S; Bertoletti L; Di Castro E; Catalano C; Passariello R
    Radiol Med; 2007 Feb; 112(1):31-46. PubMed ID: 17310293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intensity distribution and impact of scatter for dual-source CT.
    Kyriakou Y; Kalender WA
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Dec; 52(23):6969-89. PubMed ID: 18029988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Utilizing a simple CT dosimetry phantom for the comprehension of the operational characteristics of CT AEC systems.
    Tsalafoutas IA; Varsamidis A; Thalassinou S; Efstathopoulos EP
    Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111918. PubMed ID: 24320451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Does a combination of dose modulation with fast gantry rotation time limit CT image quality?
    Israel GM; Herlihy S; Rubinowitz AN; Cornfeld D; Brink J
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Jul; 191(1):140-4. PubMed ID: 18562737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Automatic exposure control in multichannel CT with tube current modulation to achieve a constant level of image noise: experimental assessment on pediatric phantoms.
    Brisse HJ; Madec L; Gaboriaud G; Lemoine T; Savignoni A; Neuenschwander S; Aubert B; Rosenwald JC
    Med Phys; 2007 Jul; 34(7):3018-33. PubMed ID: 17822010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of patient size on radiation dose for abdominal MDCT with automatic tube current modulation: phantom study.
    Schindera ST; Nelson RC; Toth TL; Nguyen GT; Toncheva GI; DeLong DM; Yoshizumi TT
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Feb; 190(2):W100-5. PubMed ID: 18212190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Efficient use of automatic exposure control systems in computed tomography requires correct patient positioning.
    Gudjonsdottir J; Svensson JR; Campling S; Brennan PC; Jonsdottir B
    Acta Radiol; 2009 Nov; 50(9):1035-41. PubMed ID: 19863414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Post-processing image filtration enabling dose reduction in standard abdominal CT.
    Leander P; Söderberg M; Fält T; Gunnarsson M; Albertsson I
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):180-5. PubMed ID: 20207748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of different phantom designs for CT scanner automatic tube current modulation system tests.
    Sookpeng S; Martin CJ; Gentle DJ
    J Radiol Prot; 2013 Dec; 33(4):735-61. PubMed ID: 24025482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dose reduction to anterior surfaces with organ-based tube-current modulation: evaluation of performance in a phantom study.
    Duan X; Wang J; Christner JA; Leng S; Grant KL; McCollough CH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Sep; 197(3):689-95. PubMed ID: 21862813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.