135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15933127)
1. Automatic tube-current modulation in CT--a comparison between different solutions.
Althén JN
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):308-12. PubMed ID: 15933127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of automatic tube current modulation on radiation dose and image quality for low tube voltage multidetector row CT angiography: phantom study.
Schindera ST; Nelson RC; Yoshizumi T; Toncheva G; Nguyen G; DeLong DM; Szucs-Farkas Z
Acad Radiol; 2009 Aug; 16(8):997-1002. PubMed ID: 19409820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effective dose and image quality evaluations of an automatic CT tube current modulation system with an anthropomorphic phantom.
Rampado O; Marchisio F; Izzo A; Garelli E; Bianchi CC; Gandini G; Ropolo R
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Oct; 72(1):181-7. PubMed ID: 18692337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison between 3-D and z-axis automatic tube current modulation technique in multidetector-row CT.
Matsubara K; Koshida K; Suzuki M; Tsujii H; Yamamoto T; Matsui O
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 128(1):106-11. PubMed ID: 17681961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of different adaptation strengths on image quality and radiation dose using Siemens Care Dose 4D.
Söderberg M; Gunnarsson M
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):173-9. PubMed ID: 20231163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Optimisation of image plate radiography with respect to tube voltage.
Tingberg A; Sjöström D
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):286-93. PubMed ID: 15933123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Automatic exposure control in computed tomography--an evaluation of systems from different manufacturers.
Söderberg M; Gunnarsson M
Acta Radiol; 2010 Jul; 51(6):625-34. PubMed ID: 20429764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of dose metrics and radiation risk models when optimizing CT x-ray tube voltage.
Huda W; Ogden KM; Khorasani MR
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Sep; 53(17):4719-32. PubMed ID: 18695298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of X-ray tube parameters, iodine concentration, and patient size on image quality in pulmonary computed tomography angiography: a chest-phantom-study.
Szucs-Farkas Z; Verdun FR; von Allmen G; Mini RL; Vock P
Invest Radiol; 2008 Jun; 43(6):374-81. PubMed ID: 18496042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Improvement in banding artefacts in four-dimensional computed tomography for radiotherapy planning.
Mori S; Endo M; Asakura H
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Oct; 51(20):5231-44. PubMed ID: 17019035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Noninvasive imaging of the coronary arteries using a 64-row multidetector CT scanner: initial clinical experience and radiation dose concerns.
Francone M; Napoli A; Carbone I; Cavacece M; Nardis PG; Lanciotti K; Visconti S; Bertoletti L; Di Castro E; Catalano C; Passariello R
Radiol Med; 2007 Feb; 112(1):31-46. PubMed ID: 17310293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Intensity distribution and impact of scatter for dual-source CT.
Kyriakou Y; Kalender WA
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Dec; 52(23):6969-89. PubMed ID: 18029988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Utilizing a simple CT dosimetry phantom for the comprehension of the operational characteristics of CT AEC systems.
Tsalafoutas IA; Varsamidis A; Thalassinou S; Efstathopoulos EP
Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111918. PubMed ID: 24320451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Does a combination of dose modulation with fast gantry rotation time limit CT image quality?
Israel GM; Herlihy S; Rubinowitz AN; Cornfeld D; Brink J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Jul; 191(1):140-4. PubMed ID: 18562737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Automatic exposure control in multichannel CT with tube current modulation to achieve a constant level of image noise: experimental assessment on pediatric phantoms.
Brisse HJ; Madec L; Gaboriaud G; Lemoine T; Savignoni A; Neuenschwander S; Aubert B; Rosenwald JC
Med Phys; 2007 Jul; 34(7):3018-33. PubMed ID: 17822010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of patient size on radiation dose for abdominal MDCT with automatic tube current modulation: phantom study.
Schindera ST; Nelson RC; Toth TL; Nguyen GT; Toncheva GI; DeLong DM; Yoshizumi TT
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Feb; 190(2):W100-5. PubMed ID: 18212190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Efficient use of automatic exposure control systems in computed tomography requires correct patient positioning.
Gudjonsdottir J; Svensson JR; Campling S; Brennan PC; Jonsdottir B
Acta Radiol; 2009 Nov; 50(9):1035-41. PubMed ID: 19863414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Post-processing image filtration enabling dose reduction in standard abdominal CT.
Leander P; Söderberg M; Fält T; Gunnarsson M; Albertsson I
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):180-5. PubMed ID: 20207748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of different phantom designs for CT scanner automatic tube current modulation system tests.
Sookpeng S; Martin CJ; Gentle DJ
J Radiol Prot; 2013 Dec; 33(4):735-61. PubMed ID: 24025482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dose reduction to anterior surfaces with organ-based tube-current modulation: evaluation of performance in a phantom study.
Duan X; Wang J; Christner JA; Leng S; Grant KL; McCollough CH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Sep; 197(3):689-95. PubMed ID: 21862813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
