296 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15933132)
41. Image overlay guidance for needle insertion in CT scanner.
Fichtinger G; Deguet A; Masamune K; Balogh E; Fischer GS; Mathieu H; Taylor RH; Zinreich SJ; Fayad LM
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 Aug; 52(8):1415-24. PubMed ID: 16119237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. [Multi-slice CT scanners].
Yu XE; Kang LL; Yang JJ
Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi; 2001 Jul; 25(4):225-9. PubMed ID: 12583224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. [Multislice computed tomography in clinical practice].
Tack D; Bailly JM; Fumière E; Delcour C
JBR-BTR; 2001 Apr; 84(2):48-55. PubMed ID: 11379599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Comparison of different phantom designs for CT scanner automatic tube current modulation system tests.
Sookpeng S; Martin CJ; Gentle DJ
J Radiol Prot; 2013 Dec; 33(4):735-61. PubMed ID: 24025482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Volumetric CT: creating a new paradigm for image acquisition and review.
Lipson SA; Fritz JV
Radiol Manage; 2003; 25(6):44-6, 48, 50. PubMed ID: 14699927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Image quality and patient dose in computed tomography examinations in Greece.
Simantirakis G; Hourdakis CJ; Economides S; Dimitriou P
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Sep; 147(1-2):129-32. PubMed ID: 21743078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Technical considerations for implementation of x-ray CT polymer gel dosimetry.
Hilts M; Jirasek A; Duzenli C
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Apr; 50(8):1727-45. PubMed ID: 15815093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. A method of predicting the image noise in paediatric multi-slice computed tomography images.
Ledenius K; Gustavsson M; Johansson S; Stålhammar F; Söderberg J; Wiklund LM; Thilander Klang A
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):313-6. PubMed ID: 15933128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Dose uniformity analysis among ten 16-slice same-model CT scanners.
Erdi YE
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2012; 36(1):154-6. PubMed ID: 22261787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Enlarged longitudinal dose profiles in cone-beam CT and the need for modified dosimetry.
Mori S; Endo M; Nishizawa K; Tsunoo T; Aoyama T; Fujiwara H; Murase K
Med Phys; 2005 Apr; 32(4):1061-9. PubMed ID: 15895591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. The effect of x-ray beam quality and geometry on radiation utilization efficiency in multidetector CT imaging.
Perisinakis K; Papadakis AE; Damilakis J
Med Phys; 2009 Apr; 36(4):1258-66. PubMed ID: 19472634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. [Accuracy analysis of computer tomography imaging for medical modeling purposes on the example of Siemens Sensation 10 scanner].
Miechowicz S; Urbanik A; Chrzan R; Grochowska A
Przegl Lek; 2010; 67(4):295-9. PubMed ID: 20687363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Comparison of organ doses and image quality between CT and flat panel XperCT scans in wrist and inner ear examinations.
Damet J; Sans-Merce M; Miéville F; Becker M; Poletti PA; Verdun FR; Baechler S
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):164-8. PubMed ID: 20200104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Performance of an automatic dose control system for CT: specifications and basic phantom tests.
Nagel HD; Stumpp P; Kahn T; Gosch D
Rofo; 2011 Jan; 183(1):60-7. PubMed ID: 20938882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. [Quality control of computed tomography scanners from the viewpoint of radiotherapy planning in Hungary].
Pesznyák C; Weisz C; Király R; Kiss B; Zelić S; Polgár I; Zaránd P
Magy Onkol; 2009 Sep; 53(3):247-51. PubMed ID: 19793688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Volume computed tomography air kerma index and image quality evaluation in Brazil.
Mecca FA; Andrade ME; Jakubiak RR; Khoury HJ; Dias SK; Miquelin CA; Nader A
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Mar; 148(4):452-6. PubMed ID: 21561947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Assessment of Image Quality and Dosimetric Performance of CT Simulators.
Rezaee M; Letourneau D
J Med Imaging Radiat Sci; 2019 Jun; 50(2):297-307. PubMed ID: 31176438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Development and performance evaluation of an experimental fine pitch detector multislice CT scanner.
Imai Y; Nukui M; Ishihara Y; Fujishige T; Ogata K; Moritake M; Kurochi H; Ogata T; Yahata M; Tang X
Med Phys; 2009 Apr; 36(4):1120-7. PubMed ID: 19472617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Comparison of methods for assessing geometric efficiency on multi-detector CT scanners.
Berris T; Perisinakis K; Papadakis AE; Damilakis J
Phys Med; 2013 May; 29(3):312-22. PubMed ID: 22561173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Comparison of three methods for determining CT dose profile: presenting the tritium method.
Hansson J; Eriksson S; Thilander-Klang A; Båth M
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):434-8. PubMed ID: 20200099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
