These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15933136)

  • 1. Distributions of scatter-to-primary and signal-to-noise ratios per pixel in digital chest imaging.
    Ullman G; Sandborg M; Dance DR; Hunt R; Alm Carlsson G
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):355-8. PubMed ID: 15933136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dose-image quality optimisation in digital chest radiography.
    Doyle P; Martin CJ; Gentle D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):269-72. PubMed ID: 15933120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [A new method for eliminating scatter components from a digital X-ray image by later processing].
    Kato H
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2006 Sep; 62(9):1359-68. PubMed ID: 17013372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The influence of patient thickness and imaging system on patient dose and physical image quality in digital chest imaging.
    Ullman G; Sandborg M; Dance DR; Hunt R; Alm Carlsson G
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):294-7. PubMed ID: 15933124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of scatter rejection and low-contrast performance of scan equalization digital radiography (SEDR), slot-scan digital radiography, and full-field digital radiography systems for chest phantom imaging.
    Liu X; Shaw CC; Lai CJ; Wang T
    Med Phys; 2011 Jan; 38(1):23-33. PubMed ID: 21361171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. ITERATIVE SCATTER CORRECTION FOR GRID-LESS BEDSIDE CHEST RADIOGRAPHY: PERFORMANCE FOR A CHEST PHANTOM.
    Mentrup D; Jockel S; Menser B; Neitzel U
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Jun; 169(1-4):308-12. PubMed ID: 26487750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Towards optimization in digital chest radiography using Monte Carlo modelling.
    Ullman G; Sandborg M; Dance DR; Hunt RA; Alm Carlsson G
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Jun; 51(11):2729-43. PubMed ID: 16723762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A framework for optimising the radiographic technique in digital X-ray imaging.
    Samei E; Dobbins JT; Lo JY; Tornai MP
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):220-9. PubMed ID: 15933112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Nodule detection in digital chest radiography: effect of system noise.
    Håkansson M; Båth M; Börjesson S; Kheddache S; Johnsson AA; Månsson LG
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):97-101. PubMed ID: 15933088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A Monte Carlo-based model for simulation of digital chest tomosynthesis.
    Ullman G; Dance DR; Sandborg M; Carlsson GA; Svalkvist A; Båth M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):159-63. PubMed ID: 20203125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluating radiographic parameters for mobile chest computed radiography: phantoms, image quality and effective dose.
    Rill LN; Brateman L; Arreola M
    Med Phys; 2003 Oct; 30(10):2727-35. PubMed ID: 14596311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Technical Note: Phantom study to evaluate the dose and image quality effects of a computed tomography organ-based tube current modulation technique.
    Gandhi D; Crotty DJ; Stevens GM; Schmidt TG
    Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6572-8. PubMed ID: 26520748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of clinical and physical measures of image quality in chest and pelvis computed radiography at different tube voltages.
    Sandborg M; Tingberg A; Ullman G; Dance DR; Alm Carlsson G
    Med Phys; 2006 Nov; 33(11):4169-75. PubMed ID: 17153395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Correlation between the signal-to-noise ratio improvement factor (KSNR) and clinical image quality for chest imaging with a computed radiography system.
    Moore CS; Wood TJ; Saunderson JR; Beavis AW
    Phys Med Biol; 2015 Dec; 60(23):9047-58. PubMed ID: 26540441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Calculation of the properties of digital mammograms using a computer simulation.
    Hunt RA; Dance DR; Bakic PR; Maidment AD; Sandborg M; Ullman G; Alm Carlsson G
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):395-8. PubMed ID: 15933144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Scanning slit chest radiography: a practical and efficient scatter control design.
    Barnes GT; Wu X; Sanders PC
    Radiology; 1994 Feb; 190(2):525-8. PubMed ID: 8284410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Experimental evaluation of fiber-interspaced antiscatter grids for large patient imaging with digital x-ray systems.
    Fetterly KA; Schueler BA
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Aug; 52(16):4863-80. PubMed ID: 17671340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Nodule detection in digital chest radiography: summary of the RADIUS chest trial.
    Håkansson M; Båth M; Börjesson S; Kheddache S; Grahn A; Ruschin M; Tingberg A; Mattsson S; Månsson LG
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):114-20. PubMed ID: 15933091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dose-image quality study in digital chest radiography using Monte Carlo simulation.
    Correa SC; Souza EM; Silva AX; Lopes RT; Yoriyaz H
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2008 Sep; 66(9):1213-7. PubMed ID: 18308576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Anthropomorphic versus geometric chest phantoms: a comparison of scatter properties.
    Baydush AH; Ghem WC; Floyd CE
    Med Phys; 2000 May; 27(5):894-7. PubMed ID: 10841391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.