154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15933151)
1. Monte Carlo simulation of a mammographic test phantom.
Hunt RA; Dance DR; Pachoud M; Alm Carlsson G; Sandborg M; Ullman G; Verdun FR
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):432-5. PubMed ID: 15933151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Calculation of the properties of digital mammograms using a computer simulation.
Hunt RA; Dance DR; Bakic PR; Maidment AD; Sandborg M; Ullman G; Alm Carlsson G
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):395-8. PubMed ID: 15933144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A high-resolution voxel phantom of the breast for dose calculations in mammography.
Hoeschen C; Fill U; Zankl M; Panzer W; Regulla D; Döhring W
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):406-9. PubMed ID: 15933147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Digital mammography image simulation using Monte Carlo.
Peplow DE; Verghese K
Med Phys; 2000 Mar; 27(3):568-79. PubMed ID: 10757608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Grid removal and impact on population dose in full-field digital mammography.
Gennaro G; Katz L; Souchay H; Klausz R; Alberelli C; di Maggio C
Med Phys; 2007 Feb; 34(2):547-55. PubMed ID: 17388172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Objective assessment of image quality in conventional and digital mammography taking into account dynamic range.
Pachoud M; Lepori D; Valley JF; Verdun FR
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):380-2. PubMed ID: 15933141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dual-energy digital mammography for calcification imaging: scatter and nonuniformity corrections.
Kappadath SC; Shaw CC
Med Phys; 2005 Nov; 32(11):3395-408. PubMed ID: 16372415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Monte Carlo generated mammograms: development and validation.
Spyrou G; Tzanakos G; Bakas A; Panayiotakis G
Phys Med Biol; 1998 Nov; 43(11):3341-57. PubMed ID: 9832020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Monte Carlo simulation of breast imaging using synchrotron radiation.
Fitousi NT; Delis H; Panayiotakis G
Med Phys; 2012 Apr; 39(4):2069-77. PubMed ID: 22482628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Contrast-to-noise ratio in magnification mammography: a Monte Carlo study.
Koutalonis M; Delis H; Spyrou G; Costaridou L; Tzanakos G; Panayiotakis G
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jun; 52(11):3185-99. PubMed ID: 17505097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Scatter dose calculation for anti-scatter linear grids in mammography.
Al Kafi MA; Maalej N; Naqvi AA
Appl Radiat Isot; 2009 Oct; 67(10):1837-41. PubMed ID: 19632851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Suitability of new anode materials in mammography: dose and subject contrast considerations using Monte Carlo simulation.
Delis H; Spyrou G; Costaridou L; Tzanakos G; Panayiotakis G
Med Phys; 2006 Nov; 33(11):4221-35. PubMed ID: 17153401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Algorithmic scatter correction in dual-energy digital mammography.
Chen X; Nishikawa RM; Chan ST; Lau BA; Zhang L; Mou X
Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111919. PubMed ID: 24320452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Average glandular dose conversion coefficients for segmented breast voxel models.
Zankl M; Fill U; Hoeschen C; Panzer W; Regulla D
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):410-4. PubMed ID: 15933148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Validation of MTF measurement for digital mammography quality control.
Carton AK; Vandenbroucke D; Struye L; Maidment AD; Kao YH; Albert M; Bosmans H; Marchal G
Med Phys; 2005 Jun; 32(6):1684-95. PubMed ID: 16013727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Using simple mathematical functions to simulate pathological structures--input for digital mammography clinical trial.
Ruschin M; Tingberg A; Båth M; Grahn A; Håkansson M; Hemdal B; Andersson I
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):424-31. PubMed ID: 15933150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Characterization of scatter in digital mammography from use of Monte Carlo simulations and comparison to physical measurements.
Leon SM; Brateman LF; Wagner LK
Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):111914. PubMed ID: 25370647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Monte Carlo simulation of primary electron production inside an a-selenium detector for x-ray mammography: physics.
Sakellaris T; Spyrou G; Tzanakos G; Panayiotakis G
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Aug; 50(16):3717-38. PubMed ID: 16077223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Monte Carlo generated conversion factors for the estimation of average glandular dose in contact and magnification mammography.
Koutalonis M; Delis H; Spyrou G; Costaridou L; Tzanakos G; Panayiotakis G
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Nov; 51(21):5539-48. PubMed ID: 17047268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dose-image quality optimisation in digital chest radiography.
Doyle P; Martin CJ; Gentle D
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):269-72. PubMed ID: 15933120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
