129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15933154)
1. RADIUS--closing the circle on the assessment of imaging performance.
Moores BM; Mattsson S; Månsson LG; Panzer W; Regulla D; Dance D; Alm Carlsson G; Verdun FR; Buhr E; Hoeschen C
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):450-7. PubMed ID: 15933154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Development of a simulator for radiographic image optimization.
Winslow M; Xu XG; Yazici B
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2005 Jun; 78(3):179-90. PubMed ID: 15899304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Method of simulating dose reduction for digital radiographic systems.
Båth M; Håkansson M; Tingberg A; Månsson LG
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):253-9. PubMed ID: 15933117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessment and optimisation of the image quality of chest-radiography systems.
Redlich U; Hoeschen C; Doehring W
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):264-8. PubMed ID: 15933119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Nodule detection in digital chest radiography: summary of the RADIUS chest trial.
Håkansson M; Båth M; Börjesson S; Kheddache S; Grahn A; Ruschin M; Tingberg A; Mattsson S; Månsson LG
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):114-20. PubMed ID: 15933091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Subjective and objective measures of image quality in digital fluoroscopy.
Walsh C; Dowling A; Meade A; Malone J
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):34-7. PubMed ID: 16461534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Image quality measurements and metrics in full field digital mammography: an overview.
Bosmans H; Carton AK; Rogge F; Zanca F; Jacobs J; Van Ongeval C; Nijs K; Van Steen A; Marchal G
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):120-30. PubMed ID: 16461531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A software tool for increased efficiency in observer performance studies in radiology.
Börjesson S; Håkansson M; Båth M; Kheddache S; Svensson S; Tingberg A; Grahn A; Ruschin M; Hemdal B; Mattsson S; Månsson LG
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):45-52. PubMed ID: 15933080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Radiation exposure of children in pediatric radiology. Part 4: Entrance doses achieved during the X-ray examination of the chest].
Seidenbusch MC; Schneider K
Rofo; 2008 Dec; 180(12):1082-103. PubMed ID: 19009497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparing planar image quality of rotating slat and parallel hole collimation: influence of system modeling.
Van Holen R; Vandenberghe S; Staelens S; Lemahieu I
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Apr; 53(7):1989-2002. PubMed ID: 18356576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A level crossing enhancement scheme for chest radiograph images.
Nagesha ; Kumar GH
Comput Biol Med; 2007 Oct; 37(10):1455-60. PubMed ID: 17374367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quality assurance (QA) procedures for software: evaluation of an ADC quality system.
Efstathopoulos EP; Benekos O; Molfetas M; Charou E; Kottou S; Argentos S; Kelekis NL
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):291-7. PubMed ID: 16464840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Receiver operating characteristic analysis: a tool for the quantitative evaluation of observer performance and imaging systems.
Metz CE
J Am Coll Radiol; 2006 Jun; 3(6):413-22. PubMed ID: 17412096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Patient dose in digital projection radiography.
Compagnone G; Pagan L; Baleni MC; Calzolaio FL; Barozzi L; Bergamini C
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):135-7. PubMed ID: 18252850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A conceptual optimisation strategy for radiography in a digital environment.
Båth M; Håkansson M; Hansson J; Månsson LG
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):230-5. PubMed ID: 15933113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of edge analysis techniques for the determination of the MTF of digital radiographic systems.
Samei E; Buhr E; Granfors P; Vandenbroucke D; Wang X
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Aug; 50(15):3613-25. PubMed ID: 16030386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of the X-ray digital linear tomosynthesis reconstruction processing method for metal artifact reduction.
Gomi T; Hirano H; Umeda T
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2009 Jun; 33(4):267-74. PubMed ID: 19237263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Acquisition-related motion compensation for digital subtraction angiography.
Ionasec RI; Heigl B; Hornegger J
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2009 Jun; 33(4):256-66. PubMed ID: 19231134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Nodule detection in digital chest radiography: effect of anatomical noise.
Båth M; Håkansson M; Börjesson S; Hoeschen C; Tischenko O; Kheddache S; Vikgren J; Månsson LG
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):109-13. PubMed ID: 15933090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Initial clinical experience with computed radiography imaging in an emergency department.
Milos MJ; Aberle DR; Baraff LJ; Gold RH; Scanlan RL; Bassett LW
Appl Radiol; 1989 Jan; 18(1):32-7. PubMed ID: 10292891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
