These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1593319)

  • 1. The effect of treatment on facial attractiveness.
    Phillips C; Trentini CJ; Douvartzidis N
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1992 Jun; 50(6):590-4. PubMed ID: 1593319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of orthognathic surgery on profile esthetics in Class II:1 malocclusions.
    Klaus K; Heumann C; Ruf S
    J Orofac Orthop; 2017 Nov; 78(6):472-479. PubMed ID: 28660422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Profile changes in orthodontic patients treated with mandibular advancement surgery.
    Tsang ST; McFadden LR; Wiltshire WA; Pershad N; Baker AB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jan; 135(1):66-72. PubMed ID: 19121503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Rating of facial attractiveness.
    Phillips C; Tulloch C; Dann C
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1992 Aug; 20(4):214-20. PubMed ID: 1526107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Surgery-first accelerated orthognathic surgery: orthodontic guidelines and setup for model surgery.
    Liou EJ; Chen PH; Wang YC; Yu CC; Huang CS; Chen YR
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Mar; 69(3):771-80. PubMed ID: 21257249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Smile attractiveness in class III patients after orthodontic camouflage or orthognathic surgery.
    Reis GM; de Freitas DS; Oliveira RC; de Oliveira RCG; Pinzan-Vercelino CRM; Freitas KMS; Valarelli FP
    Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Dec; 25(12):6791-6797. PubMed ID: 33959816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Orthognathic surgery versus orthodontic camouflage in the treatment of mandibular deficiency.
    Tucker MR
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1995 May; 53(5):572-8. PubMed ID: 7722727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Long-term follow-up of Class II adults treated with orthodontic camouflage: a comparison with orthognathic surgery outcomes.
    Mihalik CA; Proffit WR; Phillips C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Mar; 123(3):266-78. PubMed ID: 12637899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of outcomes of orthodontic and surgical-orthodontic treatment of Class II malocclusion in adults.
    Proffit WR; Phillips C; Douvartzidis N
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1992 Jun; 101(6):556-65. PubMed ID: 1598896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Applying artificial intelligence to assess the impact of orthognathic treatment on facial attractiveness and estimated age.
    Patcas R; Bernini DAJ; Volokitin A; Agustsson E; Rothe R; Timofte R
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2019 Jan; 48(1):77-83. PubMed ID: 30087062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Perception of facial esthetics: a comparison of similar class II cases treated with attempted growth modification or later orthognathic surgery.
    Shell TL; Woods MG
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Aug; 73(4):365-73. PubMed ID: 12940556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perceived changes by peer group of social impact associated with combined orthodontic-surgical correction of class III malocclusion.
    Jesani A; DiBiase AT; Cobourne MT; Newton T
    J Dent; 2014 Sep; 42(9):1135-42. PubMed ID: 24874952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The role of the divine proportion in the esthetic improvement of patients undergoing combined orthodontic/orthognathic surgical treatment.
    Baker BW; Woods MG
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 2001; 16(2):108-20. PubMed ID: 11482289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Facial aesthetics and the divine proportion: a comparison of surgical and non-surgical class II treatment.
    Shell TL; Woods MG
    Aust Orthod J; 2004 Nov; 20(2):51-63. PubMed ID: 16429875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Panel perception of facial attractiveness.
    Kerr WJ; O'Donnell JM
    Br J Orthod; 1990 Nov; 17(4):299-304. PubMed ID: 2285698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of facial attractiveness from end-of-treatment facial photographs.
    Shafiee R; Korn EL; Pearson H; Boyd RL; Baumrind S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Apr; 133(4):500-8. PubMed ID: 18405813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of combined orthodontic-orthognathic treatment for class II and III correction on posterior airway space : Comparison of mono- and bignathic osteotomies.
    Hourfar J; Kinzinger GSM; Feifel H; Vehr VM; Lisson JA
    J Orofac Orthop; 2017 Nov; 78(6):455-465. PubMed ID: 28660420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Orthodontic camouflage versus orthognathic surgery for class III deformity: comparative cephalometric analysis.
    Martinez P; Bellot-Arcís C; Llamas JM; Cibrian R; Gandia JL; Paredes-Gallardo V
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Apr; 46(4):490-495. PubMed ID: 28034574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Association between ratings of facial attractivess and patients' motivation for orthognathic surgery.
    Vargo JK; Gladwin M; Ngan P
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2003 Feb; 6(1):63-71. PubMed ID: 12627797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ratings of profile attractiveness after functional appliance treatment.
    O'Neill K; Harkness M; Knight R
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Oct; 118(4):371-6; discussion 377. PubMed ID: 11029730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.