585 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15933930)
1. A randomized prospective trial comparing unsedated esophagoscopy via transnasal and transoral routes using a 4-mm video endoscope with conventional endoscopy with sedation.
Thota PN; Zuccaro G; Vargo JJ; Conwell DL; Dumot JA; Xu M
Endoscopy; 2005 Jun; 37(6):559-65. PubMed ID: 15933930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A prospective, blinded study of diagnostic esophagoscopy with a superthin, stand-alone, battery-powered esophagoscope.
Mokhashi MS; Wildi SM; Glenn TF; Wallace MB; Jost C; Gumustop B; Kim CY; Cotton PB; Hawes RH
Am J Gastroenterol; 2003 Nov; 98(11):2383-9. PubMed ID: 14638337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Unsedated transnasal versus transoral sedated upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a one-series prospective study on safety and patient acceptability.
Stroppa I; Grasso E; Paoluzi OA; Razzini C; Tosti C; Andrei F; Biancone L; Palmieri G; Romeo F; Pallone F
Dig Liver Dis; 2008 Sep; 40(9):767-75. PubMed ID: 18424197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A prospective randomized comparative study on the safety and tolerability of transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy.
Yagi J; Adachi K; Arima N; Tanaka S; Ose T; Azumi T; Sasaki H; Sato M; Kinoshita Y
Endoscopy; 2005 Dec; 37(12):1226-31. PubMed ID: 16329022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A prospective randomized comparison of unsedated ultrathin versus standard esophagogastroduodenoscopy in routine outpatient gastroenterology practice: does it work better through the nose?
Birkner B; Fritz N; Schatke W; Hasford J
Endoscopy; 2003 Aug; 35(8):647-51. PubMed ID: 12929058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A randomized trial of unsedated transnasal small-caliber esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) versus peroral small-caliber EGD versus conventional EGD.
Preiss C; Charton JP; Schumacher B; Neuhaus H
Endoscopy; 2003 Aug; 35(8):641-6. PubMed ID: 12929057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A prospective controlled trial of an ultrathin versus a conventional endoscope in unsedated upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.
Mulcahy HE; Riches A; Kiely M; Farthing MJ; Fairclough PD
Endoscopy; 2001 Apr; 33(4):311-6. PubMed ID: 11315891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prospective randomized trial of transnasal versus peroral endoscopy using an ultrathin videoendoscope in unsedated patients.
Murata A; Akahoshi K; Sumida Y; Yamamoto H; Nakamura K; Nawata H
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2007 Apr; 22(4):482-5. PubMed ID: 17376037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prospective evaluation of 4-mm diameter endoscopes for esophagoscopy in sedated and unsedated patients.
Catanzaro A; Faulx A; Isenberg GA; Wong RC; Cooper G; Sivak MV; Chak A
Gastrointest Endosc; 2003 Mar; 57(3):300-4. PubMed ID: 12612506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Unsedated peroral endoscopy with a video ultrathin endoscope: patient acceptance, tolerance, and diagnostic accuracy.
Zaman A; Hapke R; Sahagun G; Katon RM
Am J Gastroenterol; 1998 Aug; 93(8):1260-3. PubMed ID: 9707048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Patient tolerance and acceptance of unsedated ultrathin esophagoscopy.
Faulx AL; Catanzaro A; Zyzanski S; Cooper GS; Pfau PR; Isenberg G; Wong RC; Sivak MV; Chak A
Gastrointest Endosc; 2002 May; 55(6):620-3. PubMed ID: 11979240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Feasibility and tolerance of 2-way and 4-way angulation videoscopes for unsedated patients undergoing transnasal EGD in GI cancer screening.
Tatsumi Y; Harada A; Matsumoto T; Tani T; Nishida H
Gastrointest Endosc; 2008 Jun; 67(7):1021-7. PubMed ID: 18279865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Prospective study comparing conventional and transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy for routine diagnosis].
Krakamp B; Parusel M; Saers T
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2004 Jan; 129(3):82-6. PubMed ID: 14724781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prospective evaluation of a 3.1-mm battery-powered esophagoscope in screening for esophageal varices in cirrhotic patients.
Madhotra R; Mokhashi M; Willner I; Hawes RH; Reuben A
Am J Gastroenterol; 2003 Apr; 98(4):807-12. PubMed ID: 12738460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Unsedated esophagoscopy for the diagnosis of esophageal varices in patients with cirrhosis.
Darwin P; Zangara J; Heller T; Haluszka O; Laurin J
Endoscopy; 2000 Dec; 32(12):971-3. PubMed ID: 11147947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Transnasal gastroscopy compared to conventional gastroscopy: a randomized study of feasibility, safety, and tolerance.
Campo R; Montserrat A; Brullet E
Endoscopy; 1998 Jun; 30(5):448-52. PubMed ID: 9693891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Unsedated transnasal endoscopy: a new technique for accurately detecting and grading esophageal varices in cirrhotic patients.
Saeian K; Staff D; Knox J; Binion D; Townsend W; Dua K; Shaker R
Am J Gastroenterol; 2002 Sep; 97(9):2246-9. PubMed ID: 12358240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A study comparing tolerability, satisfaction and acceptance of three different techniques for esophageal endoscopy: sedated conventional, unsedated peroral ultra thin, and esophageal capsule.
Nakos G; Karagiannis S; Ballas S; Galanis P; Alevizopoulos G; Nakos A; Mavrogiannis C
Dis Esophagus; 2009; 22(5):447-52. PubMed ID: 19191853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Transnasal endoscopy is preferred by transoral endoscopy experienced patients.
Kadayifci A; Atar M; Parlar S; Balkan A; Koruk I; Koruk M
J Gastrointestin Liver Dis; 2014 Mar; 23(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 24689093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prospective comparative study on the acceptability of unsedated transnasal endoscopy in younger versus older patients.
Murata A; Akahoshi K; Motomura Y; Matsui N; Kubokawa M; Kimura M; Ouchi J; Honda K; Endo S; Nakamura K; Takayanagi R
J Clin Gastroenterol; 2008 Oct; 42(9):965-8. PubMed ID: 18622302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]