BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

313 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15934683)

  • 1. Microleakage around glass-ceramic insert restorations luted with a high-viscous or flowable composite.
    Salim S; Santini A; Safar KN
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2005; 17(1):30-8; discussion 39. PubMed ID: 15934683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of prolonged thermal cycling on microleakage around Class V cavities restored with glass-ceramic inserts with different coefficients of thermal expansion: an in vitro study.
    Santini A; Ivanovic V; Tan CL; Ibbetson R
    Prim Dent Care; 2006 Oct; 13(4):147-53. PubMed ID: 17236570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Marginal microleakage around class V cavities restored with glass ceramic inserts of different coefficients of thermal expansion.
    Tan CL; Santini A
    J Clin Dent; 2005; 16(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 15974221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Microleakage of ceramic inlays luted with different resin cements and dentin adhesives.
    Uludag B; Ozturk O; Ozturk AN
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Oct; 102(4):235-41. PubMed ID: 19782826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of cavity configuration on microleakage around Class V restorations bonded with seven self-etching adhesives.
    Santini A; Ivanovic V; Ibbetson R; Milia E
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2004; 16(2):128-35; discussion 136. PubMed ID: 15500062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative evaluation of microleakage around Class V cavities restored with alkasite restorative material with and without bonding agent and flowable composite resin: An
    Meshram P; Meshram V; Palve D; Patil S; Gade V; Raut A
    Indian J Dent Res; 2019; 30(3):403-407. PubMed ID: 31397416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In vitro marginal leakage around Class II resin composite restorations with glass-ceramic inserts.
    Coli P; Derhami K; Brännström M
    Quintessence Int; 1997 Nov; 28(11):755-60. PubMed ID: 9573868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Microleakage of tetric ceram/excite and Ariston pHc/Ariston liner.
    Santini A; Plasschaert AJ; Mitchell S
    Am J Dent; 2001 Oct; 14(5):309-13. PubMed ID: 11803996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The marginal seal of Class II restorations: flowable composite resin compared to injectable glass ionomer.
    Payne JH
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1999; 23(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 10204453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Microleakage of resin composite restorations with glass-ceramic inserts.
    Olmez A; Oztaş N; Bilici S
    Quintessence Int; 1998 Nov; 29(11):725-9. PubMed ID: 10200722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of fiber placement or flowable resin lining on microleakage in Class II adhesive restorations.
    Belli S; Orucoglu H; Yildirim C; Eskitascioglu G
    J Adhes Dent; 2007 Apr; 9(2):175-81. PubMed ID: 17489478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Microleakage of IPS empress 2 inlay restorations luted with self-adhesive resin cements.
    Cal E; Celik EU; Turkun M
    Oper Dent; 2012; 37(4):417-24. PubMed ID: 22360365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Microleakage in ceramic inlays luted with different resin cements.
    Mota CS; Demarco FF; Camacho GB; Powers JM
    J Adhes Dent; 2003; 5(1):63-70. PubMed ID: 12729085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of flowable resin composite on microleakage in class V cavities.
    Yazici AR; Baseren M; Dayangaç B
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 12540117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of flowable resin composites as gingival increments on the microleakage of posterior resin composites.
    Attar N; Turgut MD; Güngör HC
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(2):162-7. PubMed ID: 15088727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of two light-emitting diode (LED) and one halogen curing light on the microleakage of Class V flowable composite restorations.
    Attar N; Korkmaz Y
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Feb; 8(2):80-8. PubMed ID: 17277830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In vitro evaluation of microleakage of a flowable composite in Class V restorations.
    Chimello DT; Chinelatti MA; Ramos RP; Palma Dibb RG
    Braz Dent J; 2002; 13(3):184-7. PubMed ID: 12428593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of pre-heating resin composite on restoration microleakage.
    Wagner WC; Aksu MN; Neme AM; Linger JB; Pink FE; Walker S
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(1):72-8. PubMed ID: 18335736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Microleakage associated with resin composite-cemented, cast glass ceramic restoration.
    Blair KF; Koeppen RG; Schwartz RS; Davis RD
    Int J Prosthodont; 1993; 6(6):579-84. PubMed ID: 8148030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Marginal leakage in class II-restorations after use of ceramic-inserts luted with different materials.
    Hahn P; Schaller HG; Müllner U; Hellwig E
    J Oral Rehabil; 1998 Aug; 25(8):567-74. PubMed ID: 9781859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.