BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

286 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15935756)

  • 1. Gross chromosomal rearrangements and elevated recombination at an inducible site-specific replication fork barrier.
    Lambert S; Watson A; Sheedy DM; Martin B; Carr AM
    Cell; 2005 Jun; 121(5):689-702. PubMed ID: 15935756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Homologous recombination restarts blocked replication forks at the expense of genome rearrangements by template exchange.
    Lambert S; Mizuno K; Blaisonneau J; Martineau S; Chanet R; Fréon K; Murray JM; Carr AM; Baldacci G
    Mol Cell; 2010 Aug; 39(3):346-59. PubMed ID: 20705238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Recombination occurs within minutes of replication blockage by RTS1 producing restarted forks that are prone to collapse.
    Nguyen MO; Jalan M; Morrow CA; Osman F; Whitby MC
    Elife; 2015 Mar; 4():e04539. PubMed ID: 25806683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Temporal separation of replication and recombination requires the intra-S checkpoint.
    Meister P; Taddei A; Vernis L; Poidevin M; Gasser SM; Baldacci G
    J Cell Biol; 2005 Feb; 168(4):537-44. PubMed ID: 15716375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Recovery of arrested replication forks by homologous recombination is error-prone.
    Iraqui I; Chekkal Y; Jmari N; Pietrobon V; Fréon K; Costes A; Lambert SA
    PLoS Genet; 2012; 8(10):e1002976. PubMed ID: 23093942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mus81 is essential for sister chromatid recombination at broken replication forks.
    Roseaulin L; Yamada Y; Tsutsui Y; Russell P; Iwasaki H; Arcangioli B
    EMBO J; 2008 May; 27(9):1378-87. PubMed ID: 18388861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Smc5/6 maintains stalled replication forks in a recombination-competent conformation.
    Irmisch A; Ampatzidou E; Mizuno K; O'Connell MJ; Murray JM
    EMBO J; 2009 Jan; 28(2):144-55. PubMed ID: 19158664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The PCNA unloader Elg1 promotes recombination at collapsed replication forks in fission yeast.
    Tamang S; Kishkevich A; Morrow CA; Osman F; Jalan M; Whitby MC
    Elife; 2019 May; 8():. PubMed ID: 31149897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The RecQ DNA helicase Rqh1 constrains Exonuclease 1-dependent recombination at stalled replication forks.
    Osman F; Ahn JS; Lorenz A; Whitby MC
    Sci Rep; 2016 Mar; 6():22837. PubMed ID: 26957021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Replication fork blockage by RTS1 at an ectopic site promotes recombination in fission yeast.
    Ahn JS; Osman F; Whitby MC
    EMBO J; 2005 Jun; 24(11):2011-23. PubMed ID: 15889146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Replication fork barriers: pausing for a break or stalling for time?
    Labib K; Hodgson B
    EMBO Rep; 2007 Apr; 8(4):346-53. PubMed ID: 17401409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Replication checkpoint kinase Cds1 regulates Mus81 to preserve genome integrity during replication stress.
    Kai M; Boddy MN; Russell P; Wang TS
    Genes Dev; 2005 Apr; 19(8):919-32. PubMed ID: 15805465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Recombination-restarted replication makes inverted chromosome fusions at inverted repeats.
    Mizuno K; Miyabe I; Schalbetter SA; Carr AM; Murray JM
    Nature; 2013 Jan; 493(7431):246-9. PubMed ID: 23178809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Analysis of Recombination-Dependent Processing of Blocked Replication Forks by Bidimensional Gel Electrophoresis.
    Kramarz K; Saada AA; Lambert SAE
    Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2153():365-381. PubMed ID: 32840792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15.
    Hylton HM; Lucas BE; Petreaca RC
    Genes (Basel); 2020 Jan; 11(1):. PubMed ID: 31936815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Recombination at DNA replication fork barriers is not universal and is differentially regulated by Swi1.
    Pryce DW; Ramayah S; Jaendling A; McFarlane RJ
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2009 Mar; 106(12):4770-5. PubMed ID: 19273851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cleavage of stalled forks by fission yeast Mus81/Eme1 in absence of DNA replication checkpoint.
    Froget B; Blaisonneau J; Lambert S; Baldacci G
    Mol Biol Cell; 2008 Feb; 19(2):445-56. PubMed ID: 18032583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The DNA-Binding Domain of S. pombe Mrc1 (Claspin) Acts to Enhance Stalling at Replication Barriers.
    Zech J; Godfrey EL; Masai H; Hartsuiker E; Dalgaard JZ
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0132595. PubMed ID: 26201080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. CENP-B preserves genome integrity at replication forks paused by retrotransposon LTR.
    Zaratiegui M; Vaughn MW; Irvine DV; Goto D; Watt S; Bähler J; Arcangioli B; Martienssen RA
    Nature; 2011 Jan; 469(7328):112-5. PubMed ID: 21151105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. swi1- and swi3-dependent and independent replication fork arrest at the ribosomal DNA of Schizosaccharomyces pombe.
    Krings G; Bastia D
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2004 Sep; 101(39):14085-90. PubMed ID: 15371597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.