105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15935967)
1. Estimation and comparison of CAD system performance in clinical settings.
Bornefalk H
Acad Radiol; 2005 Jun; 12(6):687-94. PubMed ID: 15935967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. On the comparison of FROC curves in mammography CAD systems.
Bornefalk H; Hermansson AB
Med Phys; 2005 Feb; 32(2):412-7. PubMed ID: 15789587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluating computer-aided detection algorithms.
Yoon HJ; Zheng B; Sahiner B; Chakraborty DP
Med Phys; 2007 Jun; 34(6):2024-38. PubMed ID: 17654906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Investigation of optimal use of computer-aided detection systems: the role of the "machine" in decision making process.
Paquerault S; Hardy PT; Wersto N; Chen J; Smith RC
Acad Radiol; 2010 Sep; 17(9):1112-21. PubMed ID: 20605489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Investigation of reading mode and relative sensitivity as factors that influence reader performance when using computer-aided detection software.
Paquerault S; Samuelson FW; Petrick N; Myers KJ; Smith RC
Acad Radiol; 2009 Sep; 16(9):1095-107. PubMed ID: 19523855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Computer-aided detection of masses in digital tomosynthesis mammography: comparison of three approaches.
Chan HP; Wei J; Zhang Y; Helvie MA; Moore RH; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski L; Kopans DB
Med Phys; 2008 Sep; 35(9):4087-95. PubMed ID: 18841861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Computer-aided mass detection based on ipsilateral multiview mammograms.
Qian W; Song D; Lei M; Sankar R; Eikman E
Acad Radiol; 2007 May; 14(5):530-8. PubMed ID: 17434066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Incorporation of an iterative, linear segmentation routine into a mammographic mass CAD system.
Catarious DM; Baydush AH; Floyd CE
Med Phys; 2004 Jun; 31(6):1512-20. PubMed ID: 15259655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Computer-aided mass detection in mammography: false positive reduction via gray-scale invariant ranklet texture features.
Masotti M; Lanconelli N; Campanini R
Med Phys; 2009 Feb; 36(2):311-6. PubMed ID: 19291970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Computer-aided detection of breast masses: four-view strategy for screening mammography.
Wei J; Chan HP; Zhou C; Wu YT; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski LM; Roubidoux MA; Helvie MA
Med Phys; 2011 Apr; 38(4):1867-76. PubMed ID: 21626920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Computer-aided detection system for clustered microcalcifications: comparison of performance on full-field digital mammograms and digitized screen-film mammograms.
Ge J; Hadjiiski LM; Sahiner B; Wei J; Helvie MA; Zhou C; Chan HP
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Feb; 52(4):981-1000. PubMed ID: 17264365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Application of a computer-aided detection (CAD) system to digitalized mammograms for identifying microcalcifications].
Bazzocchi M; Facecchia I; Zuiani C; Londero V; Smania S; Bottigli U; Delogu P
Radiol Med; 2001 May; 101(5):334-40. PubMed ID: 11438784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A Metric for Reducing False Positives in the Computer-Aided Detection of Breast Cancer from Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Based Screening Examinations of High-Risk Women.
Levman JE; Gallego-Ortiz C; Warner E; Causer P; Martel AL
J Digit Imaging; 2016 Feb; 29(1):126-33. PubMed ID: 26293705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Spatial localization accuracy of radiologists in free-response studies: Inferring perceptual FROC curves from mark-rating data.
Chakraborty D; Yoon HJ; Mello-Thoms C
Acad Radiol; 2007 Jan; 14(1):4-18. PubMed ID: 17178361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluating the effect of image preprocessing on an information-theoretic CAD system in mammography.
Tourassi GD; Ike R; Singh S; Harrawood B
Acad Radiol; 2008 May; 15(5):626-34. PubMed ID: 18423320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Operating characteristics predicted by models for diagnostic tasks involving lesion localization.
Chakraborty DP; Yoon HJ
Med Phys; 2008 Feb; 35(2):435-45. PubMed ID: 18383663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Improving a CAD system using bilateral information.
Tortajada M; Oliver A; Díez Y; Martí R; Vilanova JC; Freixenet J
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2010; 2010():5054-7. PubMed ID: 21096025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Computer-aided characterization of mammographic masses: accuracy of mass segmentation and its effects on characterization.
Sahiner B; Petrick N; Chan HP; Hadjiiski LM; Paramagul C; Helvie MA; Gurcan MN
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Dec; 20(12):1275-84. PubMed ID: 11811827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Screening mammography-detected cancers: sensitivity of a computer-aided detection system applied to full-field digital mammograms.
Yang SK; Moon WK; Cho N; Park JS; Cha JH; Kim SM; Kim SJ; Im JG
Radiology; 2007 Jul; 244(1):104-11. PubMed ID: 17507722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Optimizing Case-based detection performance in a multiview CAD system for mammography.
Samulski M; Karssemeijer N
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2011 Apr; 30(4):1001-9. PubMed ID: 21233045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
