130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15936494)
1. On the suitability of broadband attenuation measurement for characterizing contrast microbubbles.
Chatterjee D; Sarkar K; Jain P; Schreppler NE
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2005 Jun; 31(6):781-6. PubMed ID: 15936494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Broadband attenuation measurements of phospholipid-shelled ultrasound contrast agents.
Raymond JL; Haworth KJ; Bader KB; Radhakrishnan K; Griffin JK; Huang SL; McPherson DD; Holland CK
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Feb; 40(2):410-21. PubMed ID: 24262056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Attenuation and size distribution measurements of Definity and manipulated Definity populations.
Goertz DE; de Jong N; van der Steen AF
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2007 Sep; 33(9):1376-88. PubMed ID: 17521801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Determination of postexcitation thresholds for single ultrasound contrast agent microbubbles using double passive cavitation detection.
King DA; Malloy MJ; Roberts AC; Haak A; Yoder CC; O'Brien WD
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jun; 127(6):3449-55. PubMed ID: 20550244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Acoustic characterization of contrast-to-tissue ratio and axial resolution for dual-frequency contrast-specific acoustic angiography imaging.
Lindsey BD; Rojas JD; Martin KH; Shelton SE; Dayton PA
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2014 Oct; 61(10):1668-87. PubMed ID: 25265176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Acoustic characterization of echogenic liposomes: frequency-dependent attenuation and backscatter.
Kopechek JA; Haworth KJ; Raymond JL; Douglas Mast T; Perrin SR; Klegerman ME; Huang S; Porter TM; McPherson DD; Holland CK
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):3472-81. PubMed ID: 22088022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. High frequency attenuation measurements of lipid encapsulated contrast agents.
Goertz DE; Frijlink ME; Voormolen MM; de Jong N; van der Steen AF
Ultrasonics; 2006 Dec; 44 Suppl 1():e131-4. PubMed ID: 16843511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Absolute measurement of ultrasonic backscatter from single microbubbles.
Sboros V; Pye SD; Macdonald CA; Gomatam J; Moran CM; McDicken WN
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2005 Aug; 31(8):1063-72. PubMed ID: 16085097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pressure-dependent attenuation and scattering of phospholipid-coated microbubbles at low acoustic pressures.
Emmer M; Vos HJ; Goertz DE; van Wamel A; Versluis M; de Jong N
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2009 Jan; 35(1):102-11. PubMed ID: 18829153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Ultrasonic contrast agent shell rupture detected by inertial cavitation and rebound signals.
Ammi AY; Cleveland RO; Mamou J; Wang GI; Bridal SL; O'Brien WD
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2006 Jan; 53(1):126-36. PubMed ID: 16471439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dual-high-frequency ultrasound excitation on microbubble destruction volume.
Shen CC; Su SY; Cheng CH; Yeh CK
Ultrasonics; 2010 Jun; 50(7):698-703. PubMed ID: 20193957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Experimental acoustic characterization of an endoskeletal antibubble contrast agent: First results.
Panfilova A; Chen P; van Sloun RJG; Wijkstra H; Postema M; Poortinga AT; Mischi M
Med Phys; 2021 Nov; 48(11):6765-6780. PubMed ID: 34580883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Pressure-dependent attenuation in ultrasound contrast agents.
Chen Q; Zagzebski J; Wilson T; Stiles T
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2002 Aug; 28(8):1041-51. PubMed ID: 12217440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Radial modulation imaging of microbubble contrast agents at high frequency.
Chérin E; Brown J; Måsøy SE; Shariff H; Karshafian R; Williams R; Burns PN; Foster FS
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2008 Jun; 34(6):949-62. PubMed ID: 18294758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Experimental investigations of nonlinearities and destruction mechanisms of an experimental phospholipid-based ultrasound contrast agent.
Casciaro S; Palmizio Errico R; Conversano F; Demitri C; Distante A
Invest Radiol; 2007 Feb; 42(2):95-104. PubMed ID: 17220727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Single microbubble response using pulse sequences: initial results.
Thomas DH; Butler MB; Anderson T; Steel R; Pye SD; Poland M; Brock-Fisher T; McDicken WN; Sboros V
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2009 Jan; 35(1):112-9. PubMed ID: 18845380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The dependence of broadband ultrasound attenuation on phase interference in thin plates of variable thickness and curvature: a comparison of experimental measurement and computer simulation.
Alomari AH; Wille ML; Langton CM
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2018 May; 232(5):468-478. PubMed ID: 29589802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Nonlinear propagation of ultrasound through microbubble contrast agents and implications for imaging.
Tang MX; Eckersley RJ
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2006 Dec; 53(12):2406-15. PubMed ID: 17186923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A preliminary engineering design of intravascular dual-frequency transducers for contrast-enhanced acoustic angiography and molecular imaging.
Ma J; Martin K; Dayton PA; Jiang X
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2014 May; 61(5):870-80. PubMed ID: 24801226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. High frequency nonlinear scattering from a micrometer to submicrometer sized lipid encapsulated contrast agent.
Goertz DE; Frijlink ME; de Jong N; van der Steen AF
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2006 Apr; 32(4):569-77. PubMed ID: 16616602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
