132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15936494)
21. An in vitro study of a microbubble contrast agent using a clinical ultrasound imaging system.
Sboros V; Moran CM; Pye SD; McDicken WN
Phys Med Biol; 2004 Jan; 49(1):159-73. PubMed ID: 14971779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Monodisperse Versus Polydisperse Ultrasound Contrast Agents: Non-Linear Response, Sensitivity, and Deep Tissue Imaging Potential.
Segers T; Kruizinga P; Kok MP; Lajoinie G; de Jong N; Versluis M
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2018 Jul; 44(7):1482-1492. PubMed ID: 29705522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Interpreting attenuation at different excitation amplitudes to estimate strain-dependent interfacial rheological properties of lipid-coated monodisperse microbubbles.
Xia L; Porter TM; Sarkar K
J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Dec; 138(6):3994-4003. PubMed ID: 26723353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Effect of Temperature on the Size Distribution, Shell Properties, and Stability of Definity
Shekhar H; Smith NJ; Raymond JL; Holland CK
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2018 Feb; 44(2):434-446. PubMed ID: 29174045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Optimisation of the transmit beam parameters for generation of subharmonic signals in native and altered populations of a commercial microbubble contrast agent SonoVue®.
Ivory AM; Meaney JF; Fagan AJ; Browne JE
Phys Med; 2020 Feb; 70():176-183. PubMed ID: 32036334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. In vitro acoustic characterization of three phospholipid ultrasound contrast agents from 12 to 43 MHz.
Sun C; Sboros V; Butler MB; Moran CM
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Mar; 40(3):541-50. PubMed ID: 24361219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Broadband high-frequency measurement of ultrasonic attenuation of tissues and liquids.
Bauer-Marschallinger J; Berer T; Grun H; Roitner H; Reitinger B; Burgholzer P
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2012 Dec; 59(12):2631-45. PubMed ID: 23221212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Contrast-enhanced intravascular ultrasound pulse sequences for bandwidth-limited transducers.
Maresca D; Renaud G; van Soest G; Li X; Zhou Q; Shung KK; de Jong N; van der Steen AF
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2013 Apr; 39(4):706-13. PubMed ID: 23384459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Low-amplitude non-linear volume vibrations of single microbubbles measured with an "acoustical camera".
Renaud G; Bosch JG; Van Der Steen AF; De Jong N
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Jun; 40(6):1282-95. PubMed ID: 24613552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. On the relationship between microbubble fragmentation, deflation and broadband superharmonic signal production.
Lindsey BD; Rojas JD; Dayton PA
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2015 Jun; 41(6):1711-25. PubMed ID: 25766572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Ultrafast 2-dimensional image monitoring and array-based passive cavitation detection for ultrasound contrast agent destruction in a variably sized region.
Xu S; Hu H; Jiang H; Xu Z; Wan M
J Ultrasound Med; 2014 Nov; 33(11):1957-70. PubMed ID: 25336483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Cavitation threshold of microbubbles in gel tunnels by focused ultrasound.
Sassaroli E; Hynynen K
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2007 Oct; 33(10):1651-60. PubMed ID: 17590501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. In vitro characterization of the subharmonic ultrasound signal from Definity microbubbles at high frequencies.
Cheung K; Couture O; Bevan PD; Cherin E; Williams R; Burns PN; Foster FS
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Mar; 53(5):1209-23. PubMed ID: 18296758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Optimising phase and amplitude modulation schemes for imaging microbubble contrast agents at low acoustic power.
Eckersley RJ; Chin CT; Burns PN
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2005 Feb; 31(2):213-9. PubMed ID: 15708461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Encapsulated contrast microbubble radial oscillation associated with postexcitation pressure peaks.
Santin MD; King DA; Foiret J; Haak A; O'Brien WD; Bridal SL
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Feb; 127(2):1156-64. PubMed ID: 20136236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Blood-brain barrier (BBB) disruption using a diagnostic ultrasound scanner and Definity in Mice.
Bing KF; Howles GP; Qi Y; Palmeri ML; Nightingale KR
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2009 Aug; 35(8):1298-308. PubMed ID: 19545939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Acoustic characterization in whole blood and plasma of site-targeted nanoparticle ultrasound contrast agent for molecular imaging.
Hughes MS; Marsh JN; Hall CS; Fuhrhop RW; Lacy EK; Lanza GM; Wickline SA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Feb; 117(2):964-72. PubMed ID: 15759715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Investigating the significance of multiple scattering in ultrasound contrast agent particle populations.
Stride E; Saffari N
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2005 Dec; 52(12):2332-45. PubMed ID: 16463501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Acoustic techniques for assessing the Optison destruction threshold.
Porter TM; Smith DA; Holland CK
J Ultrasound Med; 2006 Dec; 25(12):1519-29. PubMed ID: 17121946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Ultrasound-enhanced thrombolysis using Definity as a cavitation nucleation agent.
Datta S; Coussios CC; Ammi AY; Mast TD; de Courten-Myers GM; Holland CK
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2008 Sep; 34(9):1421-33. PubMed ID: 18378380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
