These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1593653)

  • 1. Effectiveness, costs, and cost-effectiveness of recruitment strategies for a mammographic screening program to detect breast cancer.
    Hurley SF; Jolley DJ; Livingston PM; Reading D; Cockburn J; Flint-Richter D
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 1992 Jun; 84(11):855-63. PubMed ID: 1593653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mammographic screening: measurement of the cost in a population based programme in Victoria, Australia.
    Hurley SF; Livingston PM; Thane N; Quang L
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 1994 Aug; 48(4):391-9. PubMed ID: 7964340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Recruitment to mammography screening: a randomised trial and meta-analysis of invitation letters and telephone calls.
    Page A; Morrell S; Chiu C; Taylor R; Tewson R
    Aust N Z J Public Health; 2006 Apr; 30(2):111-8. PubMed ID: 16681329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cost-effectiveness of strategies to enhance mammography use.
    Fishman P; Taplin S; Meyer D; Barlow W
    Eff Clin Pract; 2000; 3(5):213-20. PubMed ID: 11185326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Encouraging attendance at a screening mammography programme: determinants of response to different recruitment strategies.
    Schofield PE; Cockburn J; Hill DJ; Reading D
    J Med Screen; 1994 Jul; 1(3):144-9. PubMed ID: 8790507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Strategies for increasing women participation in community breast cancer screening.
    Bonfill X; Marzo M; Pladevall M; Martí J; Emparanza JI
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2001; 2001(1):CD002943. PubMed ID: 11279781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effectiveness of invitations from general practitioners in recruiting women to mammographic screening.
    Dorsch MM; Cheok F; Ingham HM
    Med J Aust; 1991 Nov; 155(9):623-5. PubMed ID: 1943962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Improving breast screening uptake: persuading initial non-attenders to attend.
    Turner KM; Wilson BJ; Gilbert FJ
    J Med Screen; 1994 Jul; 1(3):199-202. PubMed ID: 8790517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A community peer-volunteer telephone reminder call to increase breast cancer-screening attendance.
    Goelen G; De Clercq G; Hanssens S
    Oncol Nurs Forum; 2010 Jul; 37(4):E312-7. PubMed ID: 20591795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Recruitment activities and sociodemographic factors that predict attendance at a mammographic screening program.
    Hurley SF; Huggins RM; Jolley DJ; Reading D
    Am J Public Health; 1994 Oct; 84(10):1655-8. PubMed ID: 7943490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cost-effectiveness of breast cancer screening in women on dialysis.
    Wong G; Howard K; Chapman JR; Craig JC
    Am J Kidney Dis; 2008 Nov; 52(5):916-29. PubMed ID: 18789566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Costs and cost-effectiveness of a clinical intervention to increase mammography utilization in an inner city public health hospital.
    Thompson B; Thompson LA; Andersen MR; Hager S; Taylor V; Urban N
    Prev Med; 2002 Jul; 35(1):87-96. PubMed ID: 12079445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Personal costs incurred by women attending a mammographic screening programme.
    Hurley SF; Livingston PM
    Med J Aust; 1991 Jan; 154(2):132-4. PubMed ID: 1986191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mammography screening: an incremental cost effectiveness analysis of two view versus one view procedures in London.
    Bryan S; Brown J; Warren R
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 1995 Feb; 49(1):70-8. PubMed ID: 7707010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A cost utility analysis of mammography screening in Australia.
    Hall J; Gerard K; Salkeld G; Richardson J
    Soc Sci Med; 1992 May; 34(9):993-1004. PubMed ID: 1631612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A cost-effectiveness comparison of three tailored interventions to increase mammography screening.
    Saywell RM; Champion VL; Skinner CS; Menon U; Daggy J
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2004 Oct; 13(8):909-18. PubMed ID: 15671706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Estimating personal costs incurred by a woman participating in mammography screening in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program.
    Ekwueme DU; Hall IJ; Richardson LC; Gardner JG; Royalty J; Thompson TD
    Cancer; 2008 Aug; 113(3):592-601. PubMed ID: 18536027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The safety net: a cost-effective approach to improving breast and cervical cancer screening.
    Vogt TM; Glass A; Glasgow RE; La Chance PA; Lichtenstein E
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2003 Oct; 12(8):789-98. PubMed ID: 14588129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cost-effectiveness of annual versus biennial screening mammography for women with high mammographic breast density.
    Pataky R; Ismail Z; Coldman AJ; Elwood M; Gelmon K; Hedden L; Hislop G; Kan L; McCoy B; Olivotto IA; Peacock S
    J Med Screen; 2014 Dec; 21(4):180-8. PubMed ID: 25186116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.