95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15937457)
1. Unchecked by government, genetic tests sell hope and hype.
Marris E
Nat Med; 2005 Jun; 11(6):584. PubMed ID: 15937457
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. What's brewing in genetic testing.
Nat Genet; 2002 Dec; 32(4):553-4. PubMed ID: 12457183
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The medical examination in United States immigration applications: the potential use of genetic testing leads to heightened privacy concerns.
Burroughs AM
J Biolaw Bus; 2005; 8(4):22-32. PubMed ID: 16619448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bridging the gap between life insurer and consumer in the genetic testing era: the RF proposal.
Keefer CM
Indiana Law J; 1999; 74(4):1375-95. PubMed ID: 16211754
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Government support of genetic services.
Reilly P
Soc Biol; 1978; 25(1):23-32. PubMed ID: 653366
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Preparing for a consumer-driven genomic age.
Evans JP; Dale DC; Fomous C
N Engl J Med; 2010 Sep; 363(12):1099-103. PubMed ID: 20843241
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The need for increased oversight of genetic testing: a detailed look at the genetic testing process.
Bonnin DC
Houst J Health Law Policy; 2003; 4(1):149-80. PubMed ID: 16596751
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Regulators weigh risks of consumer genetic tests.
Schmidt C
Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Feb; 26(2):145-6. PubMed ID: 18259159
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Europe to ban direct-to-consumer genetic tests?
Borry P
Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Jul; 26(7):736-7. PubMed ID: 18612288
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Analysis: Secretary's Advisory Committee on Genetics, Health, and Society Report falls short.
Klein RD
Hum Pathol; 2009 Feb; 40(2):147-55. PubMed ID: 19084265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Government panel focuses on top priorities for guiding genetic testing policies.
Lavine G
Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2008 Aug; 65(16):1493-4. PubMed ID: 18693196
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Oversight of US genetic testing laboratories.
Hudson KL; Murphy JA; Kaufman DJ; Javitt GH; Katsanis SH; Scott J
Nat Biotechnol; 2006 Sep; 24(9):1083-90. PubMed ID: 16964214
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Advisory committee on heritable disorders and genetic diseases in newborns and children.
Howell RR;
Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev; 2006; 12(4):313-5. PubMed ID: 17183571
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Predictive genetic testing of minors.
Johnson A
NCSL Legisbrief; 2006; 14(19):1-2. PubMed ID: 16604754
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Information overload? As genetic testing kits sold directly to consumers gain popularity, medical professionals and lawmakers wonder if more regulation is needed.
Goodwin K
State Legis; 2008 Sep; 34(8):30-3. PubMed ID: 18754160
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The future of genomics: hope or hype?
Arp D
AHIP Cover; 2005; 46(2):14-7. PubMed ID: 15856797
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. UK insurers allowed to use genetic tests.
Dickson D
Nat Med; 2000 Nov; 6(11):1199. PubMed ID: 11062517
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Federal genetic nondiscrimination legislation: the new "right" and the race to protect DNA at the local, state, and federal level.
Hathaway KA
Cathol Univers Law Rev; 2002; 52(1):133-77. PubMed ID: 16493794
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Controversial move. Leavitt seeks to tie genetic info to e-health records.
Conn J
Mod Healthc; 2006 Oct; 36(41):31. PubMed ID: 17086959
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. A conceptual framework for genetic policy: comparing the medical, public health, and fundamental rights models.
Andrews LB
Wash Univ Law Q; 2001; 79(152):221-85. PubMed ID: 16211786
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
