These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15937480)
1. Genomic screening and replication using the same data set in family-based association testing. Van Steen K; McQueen MB; Herbert A; Raby B; Lyon H; Demeo DL; Murphy A; Su J; Datta S; Rosenow C; Christman M; Silverman EK; Laird NM; Weiss ST; Lange C Nat Genet; 2005 Jul; 37(7):683-91. PubMed ID: 15937480 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Screening and replication using the same data set: testing strategies for family-based studies in which all probands are affected. Murphy A; Weiss ST; Lange C PLoS Genet; 2008 Sep; 4(9):e1000197. PubMed ID: 18802462 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. HapBoost: a fast approach to boosting haplotype association analyses in genome-wide association studies. Wan X; Yang C; Yang Q; Zhao H; Yu W IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2013; 10(1):207-12. PubMed ID: 23702557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Genome-wide complex trait analysis (GCTA): methods, data analyses, and interpretations. Yang J; Lee SH; Goddard ME; Visscher PM Methods Mol Biol; 2013; 1019():215-36. PubMed ID: 23756893 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Efficiency and power in genetic association studies. de Bakker PI; Yelensky R; Pe'er I; Gabriel SB; Daly MJ; Altshuler D Nat Genet; 2005 Nov; 37(11):1217-23. PubMed ID: 16244653 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Detecting AIDS restriction genes: from candidate genes to genome-wide association discovery. Hutcheson HB; Lautenberger JA; Nelson GW; Pontius JU; Kessing BD; Winkler CA; Smith MW; Johnson R; Stephens R; Phair J; Goedert JJ; Donfield S; O'Brien SJ Vaccine; 2008 Jun; 26(24):2951-65. PubMed ID: 18325640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fine mapping of disease genes using tagging SNPs. Sjölander A; Hössjer O; Hartman LW; Humphreys K Ann Hum Genet; 2007 Nov; 71(Pt 6):815-27. PubMed ID: 17587339 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Detailed analysis of the relative power of direct and indirect association studies and the implications for their interpretation. Moskvina V; O'Donovan MC Hum Hered; 2007; 64(1):63-73. PubMed ID: 17483598 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Testing association between disease and multiple SNPs in a candidate gene. Gauderman WJ; Murcray C; Gilliland F; Conti DV Genet Epidemiol; 2007 Jul; 31(5):383-95. PubMed ID: 17410554 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The relative power of SNPs and haplotype as genetic markers for association tests. Bader JS Pharmacogenomics; 2001 Feb; 2(1):11-24. PubMed ID: 11258193 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Further investigation of linkage disequilibrium SNPs and their ability to identify associated susceptibility loci. North BV; Curtis D; Martin ER; Lai EH; Roses AD; Sham PC Ann Hum Genet; 2004 May; 68(Pt 3):240-8. PubMed ID: 15180704 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The impact of missing and erroneous genotypes on tagging SNP selection and power of subsequent association tests. Liu W; Zhao W; Chase GA Hum Hered; 2006; 61(1):31-44. PubMed ID: 16557026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. SNPs, haplotypes, and model selection in a candidate gene region: the SIMPle analysis for multilocus data. Conti DV; Gauderman WJ Genet Epidemiol; 2004 Dec; 27(4):429-41. PubMed ID: 15543635 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Association analysis of the RGS4 gene in Han Chinese and Scottish populations with schizophrenia. Zhang F; St Clair D; Liu X; Sun X; Sham PC; Crombie C; Ma X; Wang Q; Meng H; Deng W; Yates P; Hu X; Walker N; Murray RM; Collier DA; Li T Genes Brain Behav; 2005 Oct; 4(7):444-8. PubMed ID: 16176390 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Two-sample comparison based on prediction error, with applications to candidate gene association studies. Yu K; Martin R; Rothman N; Zheng T; Lan Q Ann Hum Genet; 2007 Jan; 71(Pt 1):107-18. PubMed ID: 17227481 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Optimal haplotype block-free selection of tagging SNPs for genome-wide association studies. Halldórsson BV; Bafna V; Lippert R; Schwartz R; De La Vega FM; Clark AG; Istrail S Genome Res; 2004 Aug; 14(8):1633-40. PubMed ID: 15289481 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Haplotype uncertainty in association studies. Mensah FK; Gilthorpe MS; Davies CF; Keen LJ; Adamson PJ; Roman E; Morgan GJ; Bidwell JL; Law GR Genet Epidemiol; 2007 May; 31(4):348-57. PubMed ID: 17323369 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A tool for selecting SNPs for association studies based on observed linkage disequilibrium patterns. De La Vega FM; Isaac HI; Scafe CR Pac Symp Biocomput; 2006; ():487-98. PubMed ID: 17094263 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluating potential for whole-genome studies in Kosrae, an isolated population in Micronesia. Bonnen PE; Pe'er I; Plenge RM; Salit J; Lowe JK; Shapero MH; Lifton RP; Breslow JL; Daly MJ; Reich DE; Jones KW; Stoffel M; Altshuler D; Friedman JM Nat Genet; 2006 Feb; 38(2):214-7. PubMed ID: 16429162 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]