BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15937480)

  • 1. Genomic screening and replication using the same data set in family-based association testing.
    Van Steen K; McQueen MB; Herbert A; Raby B; Lyon H; Demeo DL; Murphy A; Su J; Datta S; Rosenow C; Christman M; Silverman EK; Laird NM; Weiss ST; Lange C
    Nat Genet; 2005 Jul; 37(7):683-91. PubMed ID: 15937480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Screening and replication using the same data set: testing strategies for family-based studies in which all probands are affected.
    Murphy A; Weiss ST; Lange C
    PLoS Genet; 2008 Sep; 4(9):e1000197. PubMed ID: 18802462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. HapBoost: a fast approach to boosting haplotype association analyses in genome-wide association studies.
    Wan X; Yang C; Yang Q; Zhao H; Yu W
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2013; 10(1):207-12. PubMed ID: 23702557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Genome-wide complex trait analysis (GCTA): methods, data analyses, and interpretations.
    Yang J; Lee SH; Goddard ME; Visscher PM
    Methods Mol Biol; 2013; 1019():215-36. PubMed ID: 23756893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Efficiency and power in genetic association studies.
    de Bakker PI; Yelensky R; Pe'er I; Gabriel SB; Daly MJ; Altshuler D
    Nat Genet; 2005 Nov; 37(11):1217-23. PubMed ID: 16244653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Detecting AIDS restriction genes: from candidate genes to genome-wide association discovery.
    Hutcheson HB; Lautenberger JA; Nelson GW; Pontius JU; Kessing BD; Winkler CA; Smith MW; Johnson R; Stephens R; Phair J; Goedert JJ; Donfield S; O'Brien SJ
    Vaccine; 2008 Jun; 26(24):2951-65. PubMed ID: 18325640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fine mapping of disease genes using tagging SNPs.
    Sjölander A; Hössjer O; Hartman LW; Humphreys K
    Ann Hum Genet; 2007 Nov; 71(Pt 6):815-27. PubMed ID: 17587339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Detailed analysis of the relative power of direct and indirect association studies and the implications for their interpretation.
    Moskvina V; O'Donovan MC
    Hum Hered; 2007; 64(1):63-73. PubMed ID: 17483598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Analysis of single-locus tests to detect gene/disease associations.
    Roeder K; Bacanu SA; Sonpar V; Zhang X; Devlin B
    Genet Epidemiol; 2005 Apr; 28(3):207-19. PubMed ID: 15637715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Testing association between disease and multiple SNPs in a candidate gene.
    Gauderman WJ; Murcray C; Gilliland F; Conti DV
    Genet Epidemiol; 2007 Jul; 31(5):383-95. PubMed ID: 17410554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The relative power of SNPs and haplotype as genetic markers for association tests.
    Bader JS
    Pharmacogenomics; 2001 Feb; 2(1):11-24. PubMed ID: 11258193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Further investigation of linkage disequilibrium SNPs and their ability to identify associated susceptibility loci.
    North BV; Curtis D; Martin ER; Lai EH; Roses AD; Sham PC
    Ann Hum Genet; 2004 May; 68(Pt 3):240-8. PubMed ID: 15180704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The impact of missing and erroneous genotypes on tagging SNP selection and power of subsequent association tests.
    Liu W; Zhao W; Chase GA
    Hum Hered; 2006; 61(1):31-44. PubMed ID: 16557026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. SNPs, haplotypes, and model selection in a candidate gene region: the SIMPle analysis for multilocus data.
    Conti DV; Gauderman WJ
    Genet Epidemiol; 2004 Dec; 27(4):429-41. PubMed ID: 15543635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Association analysis of the RGS4 gene in Han Chinese and Scottish populations with schizophrenia.
    Zhang F; St Clair D; Liu X; Sun X; Sham PC; Crombie C; Ma X; Wang Q; Meng H; Deng W; Yates P; Hu X; Walker N; Murray RM; Collier DA; Li T
    Genes Brain Behav; 2005 Oct; 4(7):444-8. PubMed ID: 16176390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Two-sample comparison based on prediction error, with applications to candidate gene association studies.
    Yu K; Martin R; Rothman N; Zheng T; Lan Q
    Ann Hum Genet; 2007 Jan; 71(Pt 1):107-18. PubMed ID: 17227481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Optimal haplotype block-free selection of tagging SNPs for genome-wide association studies.
    Halldórsson BV; Bafna V; Lippert R; Schwartz R; De La Vega FM; Clark AG; Istrail S
    Genome Res; 2004 Aug; 14(8):1633-40. PubMed ID: 15289481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Haplotype uncertainty in association studies.
    Mensah FK; Gilthorpe MS; Davies CF; Keen LJ; Adamson PJ; Roman E; Morgan GJ; Bidwell JL; Law GR
    Genet Epidemiol; 2007 May; 31(4):348-57. PubMed ID: 17323369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A tool for selecting SNPs for association studies based on observed linkage disequilibrium patterns.
    De La Vega FM; Isaac HI; Scafe CR
    Pac Symp Biocomput; 2006; ():487-98. PubMed ID: 17094263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluating potential for whole-genome studies in Kosrae, an isolated population in Micronesia.
    Bonnen PE; Pe'er I; Plenge RM; Salit J; Lowe JK; Shapero MH; Lifton RP; Breslow JL; Daly MJ; Reich DE; Jones KW; Stoffel M; Altshuler D; Friedman JM
    Nat Genet; 2006 Feb; 38(2):214-7. PubMed ID: 16429162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.