These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
294 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15937633)
1. Reproducibility of bone mineral density measurements using dual X-ray absorptiometry in daily clinical practice. El Maghraoui A; Do Santos Zounon AA; Jroundi I; Nouijai A; Ghazi M; Achemlal L; Bezza A; Tazi MA; Abouqual R Osteoporos Int; 2005 Dec; 16(12):1742-8. PubMed ID: 15937633 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reproducibility of bone mineral density measurement in daily practice. Lodder MC; Lems WF; Ader HJ; Marthinsen AE; van Coeverden SC; Lips P; Netelenbos JC; Dijkmans BA; Roos JC Ann Rheum Dis; 2004 Mar; 63(3):285-9. PubMed ID: 14962964 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The prevalence of significant left-right differences in hip bone mineral density. Hamdy R; Kiebzak GM; Seier E; Watts NB Osteoporos Int; 2006 Dec; 17(12):1772-80. PubMed ID: 17019523 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sources of variability in bone mineral density measurements: implications for study design and analysis of bone loss. Nguyen TV; Sambrook PN; Eisman JA J Bone Miner Res; 1997 Jan; 12(1):124-35. PubMed ID: 9240735 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Individual smallest detectable difference in bone mineral density measurements. Ravaud P; Reny JL; Giraudeau B; Porcher R; Dougados M; Roux C J Bone Miner Res; 1999 Aug; 14(8):1449-56. PubMed ID: 10457279 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Monitoring of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurement in clinical practice. El Maghraoui A; Achemlal L; Bezza A J Clin Densitom; 2006; 9(3):281-6. PubMed ID: 16931345 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Bone mineral density in healthy normal women and reproducibility of measurements in spine and hip using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Haddaway MJ; Davie MW; McCall IW Br J Radiol; 1992 Mar; 65(771):213-7. PubMed ID: 1547447 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. In vivo precision of the GE lunar iDXA for the assessment of lumbar spine, total hip, femoral neck, and total body bone mineral density in severely obese patients. Carver TE; Christou NV; Court O; Lemke H; Andersen RE J Clin Densitom; 2014; 17(1):109-15. PubMed ID: 23896494 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of weight and weight change on the long-term precision of spine and hip DXA measurements. Rajamanohara R; Robinson J; Rymer J; Patel R; Fogelman I; Blake GM Osteoporos Int; 2011 May; 22(5):1503-12. PubMed ID: 20700581 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reproducibility of metacarpophalangeal bone mass measurements obtained by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in healthy volunteers and patients with early arthritis. Castañeda S; González-Alvaro I; Rodríguez-Salvanés F; Quintana ML; Laffon A; García-Vadillo JA J Clin Densitom; 2007; 10(3):298-305. PubMed ID: 17574466 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparisons of noninvasive bone mineral measurements in assessing age-related loss, fracture discrimination, and diagnostic classification. Grampp S; Genant HK; Mathur A; Lang P; Jergas M; Takada M; Glüer CC; Lu Y; Chavez M J Bone Miner Res; 1997 May; 12(5):697-711. PubMed ID: 9144335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of the skeletal status by peripheral quantitative computed tomography of the forearm: short-term precision in vivo and comparison to dual X-ray absorptiometry. Grampp S; Lang P; Jergas M; Glüer CC; Mathur A; Engelke K; Genant HK J Bone Miner Res; 1995 Oct; 10(10):1566-76. PubMed ID: 8686514 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reproducibility of total and regional body composition using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in rheumatoid arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis. Djossou HJ; Tazi MA; Ahmed Ghassem M; El Ouardi N; Taoubane L; Majjad A; Sadni S; Toufik H; Achemlal L; El Maghraoui A Osteoporos Int; 2021 May; 32(5):991-999. PubMed ID: 33386877 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Establishment of BMD reference curves at different skeletal sites in women, using a Cartesian coordinate numeration system. Wu XP; Dai RC; Shan PF; Yuan LQ; Cao XZ; Liao EY; Jiang Y Osteoporos Int; 2005 Dec; 16(12):1655-62. PubMed ID: 15959619 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Estimates of volumetric bone density from projectional measurements improve the discriminatory capability of dual X-ray absorptiometry. Jergas M; Breitenseher M; Glüer CC; Yu W; Genant HK J Bone Miner Res; 1995 Jul; 10(7):1101-10. PubMed ID: 7484286 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of BMD precision for Prodigy and Delphi spine and femur scans. Shepherd JA; Fan B; Lu Y; Lewiecki EM; Miller P; Genant HK Osteoporos Int; 2006; 17(9):1303-8. PubMed ID: 16823544 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of ultrasound and X-ray absorptiometry bone measurements in a case control study of female rheumatoid arthritis patients and randomly selected subjects in the population. Haugeberg G; Ørstavik RE; Uhlig T; Falch JA; Halse JI; Kvien TK Osteoporos Int; 2003 Jun; 14(4):312-9. PubMed ID: 12730749 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dual X-ray absorptiometry: clinical evaluation of a new cone-beam system. Blake GM; Knapp KM; Fogelman I Calcif Tissue Int; 2005 Feb; 76(2):113-20. PubMed ID: 15645160 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Which to use to evaluate change in BMD at follow-up: RMS-SD or RMS-%CV? Kiebzak GM; Morgan SL; Peace F J Clin Densitom; 2012; 15(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 22154429 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Discrepancies between vertebral bone density values: the least dense vertebra. Mylonakis A; Hadjidakis D; Katsavochristos P; Androulakis II; Sfakianakis M; Raptis SA Maturitas; 2006 Mar; 53(4):476-82. PubMed ID: 16203114 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]