These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15938653)

  • 1. Internet minimal group paradigm.
    Amichai-Hamburger Y
    Cyberpsychol Behav; 2005 Apr; 8(2):140-2. PubMed ID: 15938653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Implicit ingroup metafavoritism: subtle preference for ingroup members displaying ingroup bias.
    Castelli L; Tomelleri S; Zogmaister C
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2008 Jun; 34(6):807-18. PubMed ID: 18359956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perceived entitativity and the black-sheep effect: when will we denigrate negative ingroup members?
    Lewis AC; Sherman SJ
    J Soc Psychol; 2010; 150(2):211-25. PubMed ID: 20397595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Expectation of others' reward allocation, and ingroup favoritism in reward allocation].
    Tajima T
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 1997 Jun; 68(2):135-9. PubMed ID: 9278966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. When shared group membership signifies shared subjective experience: I-sharing and the minimal group paradigm.
    Long AE; Pinel EC; Yawger GC
    J Soc Psychol; 2017; 157(4):389-406. PubMed ID: 27668756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Crossed categorization in common ingroup contexts.
    Crisp RJ; Walsh J; Hewstone M
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2006 Sep; 32(9):1204-18. PubMed ID: 16902240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The coevolution of cultural groups and ingroup favoritism.
    Efferson C; Lalive R; Fehr E
    Science; 2008 Sep; 321(5897):1844-9. PubMed ID: 18818361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Ongoing group interaction, ingroup favoritism, and reward allocation].
    Makimura Y; Yamagishi T
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 2003 Feb; 73(6):488-93. PubMed ID: 12728700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ingroup favoritism in cooperation: a meta-analysis.
    Balliet D; Wu J; De Dreu CK
    Psychol Bull; 2014 Nov; 140(6):1556-81. PubMed ID: 25222635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of mortality salience on evaluation of ingroup and outgroup sources: the impact of pro- versus counterattitudinal positions.
    See YH; Petty RE
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2006 Mar; 32(3):405-16. PubMed ID: 16455866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Black sheep effect and ingroup favoritism in social identity perspective].
    Oishi C; Yoshida F
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 2002 Dec; 73(5):405-11. PubMed ID: 12625238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Striving for success in outgroup settings: effects of contextually emphasizing ingroup dimensions on stigmatized group members' social identity and performance styles.
    Derks B; van Laar C; Ellemers N
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2006 May; 32(5):576-88. PubMed ID: 16702152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Intergroup discrimination in the minimal group paradigm: categorization, reciprocation, or fear?
    Gaertner L; Insko CA
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2000 Jul; 79(1):77-94. PubMed ID: 10909879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Real groups in the minimal group paradigm; does the group context work as corrective or catalysing agent for social discrimination?].
    Petersen LE; Blank H
    Z Exp Psychol; 2001; 48(4):302-16. PubMed ID: 11688145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Intergroup discrimination and illusory correlation induced by social category: minority, majority, and outsider].
    Kubota K
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 1997 Jun; 68(2):120-8. PubMed ID: 9278964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Competitive victimhood as a response to accusations of ingroup harm doing.
    Sullivan D; Landau MJ; Branscombe NR; Rothschild ZK
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2012 Apr; 102(4):778-95. PubMed ID: 22229457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The other side of we: when outgroup members express common identity.
    Gómez A; Dovidio JF; Huici C; Gaertner SL; Cuadrado I
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2008 Dec; 34(12):1613-26. PubMed ID: 18832337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Investigating the Evolution of Ingroup Favoritism Using a Minimal Group Interaction Paradigm: The Effects of Inter- and Intragroup Interdependence.
    Durrheim K; Quayle M; Tredoux CG; Titlestad K; Tooke L
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(11):e0165974. PubMed ID: 27851791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Corralling the ingroup: deviant derogation and perception of group variability.
    Hutchison P; Abrams D; De Moura GR
    J Soc Psychol; 2013; 153(3):334-50. PubMed ID: 23724703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Minority versus majority: intergroup discrimination in the minimal group paradigm].
    Yoshida F; Kubota K
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 1994 Dec; 65(5):346-54. PubMed ID: 7884974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.