245 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15939495)
1. Microbial gene expression in soil: methods, applications and challenges.
Saleh-Lakha S; Miller M; Campbell RG; Schneider K; Elahimanesh P; Hart MM; Trevors JT
J Microbiol Methods; 2005 Oct; 63(1):1-19. PubMed ID: 15939495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Methods of studying soil microbial diversity.
Kirk JL; Beaudette LA; Hart M; Moutoglis P; Klironomos JN; Lee H; Trevors JT
J Microbiol Methods; 2004 Aug; 58(2):169-88. PubMed ID: 15234515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Responses of Antarctic soil microbial communities and associated functions to temperature and freeze-thaw cycle frequency.
Yergeau E; Kowalchuk GA
Environ Microbiol; 2008 Sep; 10(9):2223-35. PubMed ID: 18479442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Direct analysis of tfdA gene expression by indigenous bacteria in phenoxy acid amended agricultural soil.
Baelum J; Nicolaisen MH; Holben WE; Strobel BW; Sørensen J; Jacobsen CS
ISME J; 2008 Jun; 2(6):677-87. PubMed ID: 18356824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quantification of functional genes from procaryotes in soil by PCR.
Sharma S; Radl V; Hai B; Kloos K; Fuka MM; Engel M; Schauss K; Schloter M
J Microbiol Methods; 2007 Mar; 68(3):445-52. PubMed ID: 17126937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cultivation-independent in situ molecular analysis of bacteria involved in degradation of pentachlorophenol in soil.
Mahmood S; Paton GI; Prosser JI
Environ Microbiol; 2005 Sep; 7(9):1349-60. PubMed ID: 16104858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Challenges in quantifying microbial gene expression in soil using quantitative reverse transcription real-time PCR.
Saleh-Lakha S; Shannon KE; Goyer C; Trevors JT
J Microbiol Methods; 2011 Jun; 85(3):239-43. PubMed ID: 21420445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Detection of active soil fungi by RT-PCR amplification of precursor rRNA molecules.
Anderson IC; Parkin PI
J Microbiol Methods; 2007 Feb; 68(2):248-53. PubMed ID: 17045683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effects of stubble retention and nitrogen application on soil microbial community structure and functional gene abundance under irrigated maize.
Wakelin SA; Colloff MJ; Harvey PR; Marschner P; Gregg AL; Rogers SL
FEMS Microbiol Ecol; 2007 Mar; 59(3):661-70. PubMed ID: 17116166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Responses of aerobic microbial communities and soil respiration to water-level drawdown in a northern boreal fen.
Jaatinen K; Laiho R; Vuorenmaa A; del Castillo U; Minkkinen K; Pennanen T; Penttilä T; Fritze H
Environ Microbiol; 2008 Feb; 10(2):339-53. PubMed ID: 17903215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Size and structure of bacterial, fungal and nematode communities along an Antarctic environmental gradient.
Yergeau E; Bokhorst S; Huiskes AH; Boschker HT; Aerts R; Kowalchuk GA
FEMS Microbiol Ecol; 2007 Feb; 59(2):436-51. PubMed ID: 16978243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Activity, diversity and population size of ammonia-oxidising bacteria in oil-contaminated landfarming soil.
Kurola J; Salkinoja-Salonen M; Aarnio T; Hultman J; Romantschuk M
FEMS Microbiol Lett; 2005 Sep; 250(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 16043309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quantitative community analysis: capillary electrophoresis techniques.
Semrau JD; Han JI
Methods Enzymol; 2005; 397():329-37. PubMed ID: 16260300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Elevated atmospheric CO2 affects soil microbial diversity associated with trembling aspen.
Lesaulnier C; Papamichail D; McCorkle S; Ollivier B; Skiena S; Taghavi S; Zak D; van der Lelie D
Environ Microbiol; 2008 Apr; 10(4):926-41. PubMed ID: 18218029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The influence of soil heavy metals pollution on soil microbial biomass, enzyme activity, and community composition near a copper smelter.
Wang Y; Shi J; Wang H; Lin Q; Chen X; Chen Y
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2007 May; 67(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 16828162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluating the microbial diversity of soil samples: methodological innovations.
Coutinho HL; De Oliveira VM; Manfio GP; Rosado AS
An Acad Bras Cienc; 1999; 71(3 Pt 2):491-503. PubMed ID: 10530334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Potential of hexadecane-utilizing soil-microorganisms for growth on hexadecanol, hexadecanal and hexadecanoic acid as sole sources of carbon and energy.
Dashti N; Al-Awadhi H; Khanafer M; Abdelghany S; Radwan S
Chemosphere; 2008 Jan; 70(3):475-9. PubMed ID: 17675208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Response of fungal, bacterial and ureolytic communities to synthetic sheep urine deposition in a grassland soil.
Singh BK; Nunan N; Millard P
FEMS Microbiol Ecol; 2009 Oct; 70(1):109-17. PubMed ID: 19622069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Bacterial and fungal communities in bulk soil and rhizospheres of aluminum-tolerant and aluminum-sensitive maize (Zea mays L.) lines cultivated in unlimed and limed Cerrado soil.
Da Mota FF; Gomes EA; Marriel IE; Paiva E; Seldin L
J Microbiol Biotechnol; 2008 May; 18(5):805-14. PubMed ID: 18633275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reverse transcription-PCR methods significantly impact richness and composition measures of expressed fungal cellobiohydrolase I genes in soil and litter.
Weber CF; Kuske CR
J Microbiol Methods; 2011 Sep; 86(3):344-50. PubMed ID: 21704085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]