These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. The role of contract principles in determining the validity of surrogacy contracts. Carbone JR Santa Clara Law Rev; 1988; 28(3):581-610. PubMed ID: 16047440 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Adult domestic violence in cases of international parental child abduction. Shetty S; Edleson JL Violence Against Women; 2005 Jan; 11(1):115-38. PubMed ID: 16043543 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validity of a child interview measure of attachment as used in child custody evaluations. Marcus RF; Mirle J Percept Mot Skills; 1990 Jun; 70(3 Pt 1):1043-54. PubMed ID: 2377401 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Authority to treat: a comparative look at the jurisdiction, practice and procedure of the Supreme Court of Victoria, Children's Court of Victoria and Family Court of Australia in medical matters. Keough WJ J Law Med; 2003 May; 10(4):442-59. PubMed ID: 12852318 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biological parents regaining their rights: a psycholegal analysis of a new era in custody disputes. Kermani EJ; Weiss BA Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1995; 23(2):261-7. PubMed ID: 8605410 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. When parents have a mental illness. Anyaegbunam J Nurs Times; 2001 Dec 13-2002 Jan 2; 97(50):39-40. PubMed ID: 11965697 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Where is the voice of the man the child will become? Geisheker JV J Clin Ethics; 2010; 21(1):86-8. PubMed ID: 20465080 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Parental alienation and the judiciary. Lowenstein LF Med Leg J; 1999; 67(Pt 3):121-3. PubMed ID: 16252603 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Parental alienation and the courts. Mitchell J Med Leg J; 2002; 70(Pt 4):194-5. PubMed ID: 12616792 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Whose child? In Re Baby M and the biological preference principle. Houlgate LD Logos (Santa Clara); 1988; 9():161-77. PubMed ID: 12708426 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Fathers' rights groups: demographic correlates and impact on custody policy. Rosen LN; Dragiewicz M; Gibbs JC Violence Against Women; 2009 May; 15(5):513-31. PubMed ID: 19255420 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Where is the child? Circumcision and custody in Boldt v. Boldt. Dolgin JL J Clin Ethics; 2009; 20(3):244-50. PubMed ID: 19845197 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. When children seek asylum from their parents: a Canadian case study. Bossin M; Demirdache L New Dir Child Adolesc Dev; 2012; 2012(136):47-64. PubMed ID: 22689523 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Strategies for preserving the bonds: Meeting Points]. Guigon LA Rev Med Suisse Romande; 2000 Mar; 120(3):217-8. PubMed ID: 10815452 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Who's in charge? Guardianships and children. Weiler K; Helms LB MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs; 1992; 17(5):232-5. PubMed ID: 1406101 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Decisions at the end of life of children and adolescents pose particular legal problems. Our expert illuminates the legal status. Judges can deny custody in certain cases]. Weber M Pflege Z; 2014 Nov; 67(11):686-8. PubMed ID: 25608337 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Predictors of custody and visitation decisions by a family court clinic. Raub JM; Carson NJ; Cook BL; Wyshak G; Hauser BB J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2013; 41(2):206-18. PubMed ID: 23771934 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Boldt v. Boldt. Davis DS J Clin Ethics; 2009; 20(3):241-3. PubMed ID: 19845196 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Where do the children go?--surrogate mother contracts and the best interests of the child. Carney BJ Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1988; 22(4):1187-217. PubMed ID: 15929235 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]