These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

80 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15940060)

  • 1. Digital cine angiography permits radiation dose reduction without reduction in image quality.
    Funama Y; Awai K; Umezu Y; Shimamura M; Ogawa K; Kato T; Hashida M; Yamashita Y
    Radiat Med; 2005 May; 23(3):151-5. PubMed ID: 15940060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Studies of image quality and dose in digital subtraction angiography].
    Heckmann H; Kamm KF; Vetter S; Strecker EP; Busch HP
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1997 Jul; 7(4):205-11. PubMed ID: 9340020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Significant dose reduction for pediatric digital subtraction angiography without impairing image quality: preclinical study in a piglet model.
    Racadio J; Strauss K; Abruzzo T; Patel M; Kukreja K; Johnson N; den Hartog M; Hoornaert B; Nachabe R
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Oct; 203(4):904-8. PubMed ID: 25247959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Optimization of beam filtering, kv-ma regulation curve and image intensifier entrance exposure rate to reduce radiation exposure in angiographic fluoroscopy].
    Barkhausen J; Schoenfelder D; Nagel HD; Stöblen F; Müller RD
    Rofo; 1999 Nov; 171(5):391-5. PubMed ID: 10619042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of radiographic techniques (kVp and mAs) on image quality and patient doses in digital subtraction angiography.
    Gkanatsios NA; Huda W; Peters KR
    Med Phys; 2002 Aug; 29(8):1643-50. PubMed ID: 12201409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quality assurance of computed and digital radiography systems.
    Walsh C; Gorman D; Byrne P; Larkin A; Dowling A; Malone JF
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):271-5. PubMed ID: 18319281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Experimental investigations for dose reduction by optimizing the radiation quality for digital mammography with an a-Se detector].
    Schulz-Wendtland R; Hermann KP; Wenkel E; Böhner C; Lell M; Dassel MS; Bautz WA
    Rofo; 2007 May; 179(5):487-91. PubMed ID: 17436182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Radiation dose reduction in direct digital panoramic radiography.
    Gavala S; Donta C; Tsiklakis K; Boziari A; Kamenopoulou V; Stamatakis HC
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Jul; 71(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 18448296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of automatic tube current modulation on radiation dose and image quality for low tube voltage multidetector row CT angiography: phantom study.
    Schindera ST; Nelson RC; Yoshizumi T; Toncheva G; Nguyen G; DeLong DM; Szucs-Farkas Z
    Acad Radiol; 2009 Aug; 16(8):997-1002. PubMed ID: 19409820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Radiation protection to the eye and thyroid during diagnostic cerebral angiography: a phantom study.
    Shortt CP; Malone L; Thornton J; Brennan P; Lee MJ
    J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2008 Aug; 52(4):365-9. PubMed ID: 18811760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Radiation doses to patients from digital subtraction angiography.
    Goni H; Tsalafoutas IA; Tzortzis G; Pappas P; Bouzas N; Loulakas J; Georgiou A; Georgiou E; Yakoumakis EN
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):251-5. PubMed ID: 16461514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Candidate image processing for real-time volumetric CT subtraction angiography.
    Mori S; Endo M
    Eur J Radiol; 2007 Feb; 61(2):335-41. PubMed ID: 17097254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Radiation dose and image quality for paediatric interventional cardiology.
    Vano E; Ubeda C; Leyton F; Miranda P
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Aug; 53(15):4049-62. PubMed ID: 18612174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Increasing film-focus distance (FFD) reduces radiation dose for x-ray examinations.
    Brennan PC; McDonnell S; O'Leary D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 108(3):263-8. PubMed ID: 15031448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Are new technologies always reducing patient doses in cardiac procedures?
    Trianni A; Bernardi G; Padovani R
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):97-101. PubMed ID: 16461516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Radiation dose reduction at a price: the effectiveness of a male gonadal shield during helical CT scans.
    Dauer LT; Casciotta KA; Erdi YE; Rothenberg LN
    BMC Med Imaging; 2007 Mar; 7():5. PubMed ID: 17367529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Patient dosimetry and image quality in digital radiology from online audit of the X-ray system.
    Vano E; Fernandez JM; Ten JI; Gonzalez L; Guibelalde E; Prieto C
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):199-203. PubMed ID: 16461529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [How conservative is routine personal dosimetry monitoring in diagnostic radiology?].
    von Boetticher H; Lachmund J; Hoffmann W
    Rofo; 2007 Jul; 179(7):728-32. PubMed ID: 17657704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Female breast radiation exposure during thorax multidetector computed tomography and the effectiveness of bismuth breast shield to reduce breast radiation dose.
    Yilmaz MH; Albayram S; Yaşar D; Ozer H; Adaletli I; Selçuk D; Akman C; Altuğ A
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2007; 31(1):138-42. PubMed ID: 17259846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Radiation dose and image quality for paediatric interventional cardiology systems. A national survey in Chile.
    Ubeda C; Vano E; Miranda P; Leyton F; Martinez LC; Oyarzun C
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Nov; 147(3):429-38. PubMed ID: 21148589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.