These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
384 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15940477)
1. The long-term mechanical integrity of non-reinforced PEEK-OPTIMA polymer for demanding spinal applications: experimental and finite-element analysis. Ferguson SJ; Visser JM; Polikeit A Eur Spine J; 2006 Feb; 15(2):149-56. PubMed ID: 15940477 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biomechanical assessment of a PEEK rod system for semi-rigid fixation of lumbar fusion constructs. Gornet MF; Chan FW; Coleman JC; Murrell B; Nockels RP; Taylor BA; Lanman TH; Ochoa JA J Biomech Eng; 2011 Aug; 133(8):081009. PubMed ID: 21950902 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of porous orthopaedic implant material and structure on load sharing with simulated bone ingrowth: A finite element analysis comparing titanium and PEEK. Carpenter RD; Klosterhoff BS; Torstrick FB; Foley KT; Burkus JK; Lee CSD; Gall K; Guldberg RE; Safranski DL J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2018 Apr; 80():68-76. PubMed ID: 29414477 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomechanical evaluation and comparison of polyetheretherketone rod system to traditional titanium rod fixation. Ponnappan RK; Serhan H; Zarda B; Patel R; Albert T; Vaccaro AR Spine J; 2009 Mar; 9(3):263-7. PubMed ID: 18838341 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomechanical rationale for using polyetheretherketone (PEEK) spacers for lumbar interbody fusion-A finite element study. Vadapalli S; Sairyo K; Goel VK; Robon M; Biyani A; Khandha A; Ebraheim NA Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Dec; 31(26):E992-8. PubMed ID: 17172990 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Do Surface Porosity and Pore Size Influence Mechanical Properties and Cellular Response to PEEK? Torstrick FB; Evans NT; Stevens HY; Gall K; Guldberg RE Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Nov; 474(11):2373-2383. PubMed ID: 27154533 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Characterization of wear in composite material orthopaedic implants. Part II: The implant/bone interface. Albert K; Schledjewski R; Harbaugh M; Bleser S; Jamison R; Friedrich K Biomed Mater Eng; 1994; 4(3):199-211. PubMed ID: 7950869 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Stress shielding and fatigue limits of poly-ether-ether-ketone dental implants. Lee WT; Koak JY; Lim YJ; Kim SK; Kwon HB; Kim MJ J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2012 May; 100(4):1044-52. PubMed ID: 22331553 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Properties and Corrosion Performance of Self-reinforced Composite PEEK for Proposed Use as a Modular Taper Gasket. Ouellette ES; Gilbert JL Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Nov; 474(11):2414-2427. PubMed ID: 27146655 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Carbon fiber reinforced PEEK Optima--a composite material biomechanical properties and wear/debris characteristics of CF-PEEK composites for orthopedic trauma implants. Steinberg EL; Rath E; Shlaifer A; Chechik O; Maman E; Salai M J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2013 Jan; 17():221-8. PubMed ID: 23127632 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Finite element analysis of the biomechanical effects of PEEK dental implants on the peri-implant bone. Schwitalla AD; Abou-Emara M; Spintig T; Lackmann J; Müller WD J Biomech; 2015 Jan; 48(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 25435385 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Interfacial shear strength of bioactive-coated carbon fiber reinforced polyetheretherketone after in vivo implantation. Nakahara I; Takao M; Goto T; Ohtsuki C; Hibino S; Sugano N J Orthop Res; 2012 Oct; 30(10):1618-25. PubMed ID: 22467537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mechanical properties and in vitro response of strontium-containing hydroxyapatite/polyetheretherketone composites. Wong KL; Wong CT; Liu WC; Pan HB; Fong MK; Lam WM; Cheung WL; Tang WM; Chiu KY; Luk KD; Lu WW Biomaterials; 2009 Aug; 30(23-24):3810-7. PubMed ID: 19427032 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Load transfer characteristics between posterior spinal implants and the lumbar spine under anterior shear loading: an in vitro investigation. Melnyk AD; Wen TL; Kingwell S; Chak JD; Singh V; Cripton PA; Fisher CG; Dvorak MF; Oxland TR Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Aug; 37(18):E1126-33. PubMed ID: 22565384 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Biomechanical comparison of two different concepts for stand alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Schleicher P; Gerlach R; Schär B; Cain CM; Achatz W; Pflugmacher R; Haas NP; Kandziora F Eur Spine J; 2008 Dec; 17(12):1757-65. PubMed ID: 18841399 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An investigation into PEEK-on-PEEK as a bearing surface candidate for cervical total disc replacement. Kraft M; Koch DK; Bushelow M Spine J; 2012 Jul; 12(7):603-11. PubMed ID: 22964013 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]