BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15941648)

  • 1. Vowel effect on glottal parameters and the magnitude of jaw opening.
    Lim M; Lin E; Bones P
    J Voice; 2006 Mar; 20(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 15941648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. EGG open quotient in aging voices--changes with increasing chronological age and its perception.
    Winkler R; Sendlmeier W
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2006; 31(2):51-6. PubMed ID: 16754276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Jaw opening in novice and experienced classically trained singers.
    Austin SF
    J Voice; 2007 Jan; 21(1):72-9. PubMed ID: 16413745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Relationship of Various Open Quotients With Acoustic Property, Phonation Types, Fundamental Frequency, and Intensity.
    Yokonishi H; Imagawa H; Sakakibara K; Yamauchi A; Nito T; Yamasoba T; Tayama N
    J Voice; 2016 Mar; 30(2):145-57. PubMed ID: 25953586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Electroglottographic analysis of actresses and nonactresses' voices in different levels of intensity.
    Master S; Guzman M; Carlos de Miranda H; Lloyd A
    J Voice; 2013 Mar; 27(2):187-94. PubMed ID: 23294706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Acoustic and EGG analyses of emotional utterances.
    Waaramaa T; Kankare E
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2013 Apr; 38(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 22587654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Emotions in vowel segments of continuous speech: analysis of the glottal flow using the normalised amplitude quotient.
    Airas M; Alku P
    Phonetica; 2006; 63(1):26-46. PubMed ID: 16514274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Electroglottographic evaluation of gender and vowel effects during modal and vocal fry phonation.
    Chen Y; Robb MP; Gilbert HR
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2002 Oct; 45(5):821-9. PubMed ID: 12381041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Electroglottographic contact quotient in different phonation types using different amplitude threshold levels.
    Kankare E; Laukkanen AM; Ilomäki I; Miettinen A; Pylkkänen T
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2012 Oct; 37(3):127-32. PubMed ID: 22432606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Variability of electroglottographic glottal closed quotients: necessity of standardization to obtain normative values.
    Kania RE; Hans S; Hartl DM; Clement P; Crevier-Buchman L; Brasnu DF
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2004 Mar; 130(3):349-52. PubMed ID: 15023846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Using electroglottographic real-time feedback to control posterior glottal adduction during phonation.
    Herbst CT; Howard D; Schlömicher-Thier J
    J Voice; 2010 Jan; 24(1):72-85. PubMed ID: 19185453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Acoustic voice analysis of prelingually deaf adults before and after cochlear implantation.
    Evans MK; Deliyski DD
    J Voice; 2007 Nov; 21(6):669-82. PubMed ID: 16952440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. On the use of the derivative of electroglottographic signals for characterization of nonpathological phonation.
    Henrich N; d'Alessandro C; Doval B; Castellengo M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Mar; 115(3):1321-32. PubMed ID: 15058354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Glottal open quotient in singing: measurements and correlation with laryngeal mechanisms, vocal intensity, and fundamental frequency.
    Henrich N; D'Alessandro C; Doval B; Castellengo M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Mar; 117(3 Pt 1):1417-30. PubMed ID: 15807029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of HearFones on speaking and singing voice quality.
    Laukkanen AM; Mickelson NP; Laitala M; Syrjä T; Salo A; Sihvo M
    J Voice; 2004 Dec; 18(4):475-87. PubMed ID: 15567049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An Examination of the Relationship Between Electroglottographic Contact Quotient, Electroglottographic Decontacting Phase Profile, and Acoustical Spectral Moments.
    Awan SN; Krauss AR; Herbst CT
    J Voice; 2015 Sep; 29(5):519-29. PubMed ID: 25795367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of Speech Characteristics on Electroglottographic and Instrumental Acoustic Voice Analysis Metrics in Women With Structural Dysphonia Before and After Treatment.
    Iob NA; He L; Ternström S; Cai H; Brockmann-Bauser M
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2024 Jun; 67(6):1660-1681. PubMed ID: 38758676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An Acoustic and Electroglottographic Study of the Aging Voice With and Without an Open Jaw Posture.
    Mautner HD
    J Voice; 2015 Jul; 29(4):518.e1-11. PubMed ID: 25873545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of different methods to measure the EGG contact quotient.
    Herbst C; Ternström S
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2006; 31(3):126-38. PubMed ID: 16966155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of speech noise on vocal fundamental frequency using power spectral analysis.
    Lee GS; Hsiao TY; Yang CC; Kuo TB
    Ear Hear; 2007 Jun; 28(3):343-50. PubMed ID: 17485983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.