BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15941744)

  • 1. Answer to the comments of K. Dobbin, J. Shih and R. Simon on the paper 'Evaluation of the gene-specific dye-bias in cDNA microarray experiments'.
    Martin-Magniette ML; Aubert J; Cabannes E; Daudin JJ
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Jul; 21(14):3065. PubMed ID: 15941744
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comment on 'Evaluation of the gene-specific dye bias in cDNA microarray experiments'.
    Dobbin KK; Shih JH; Simon RM
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Jun; 21(12):2803-4. PubMed ID: 15817695
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of the gene-specific dye bias in cDNA microarray experiments.
    Martin-Magniette ML; Aubert J; Cabannes E; Daudin JJ
    Bioinformatics; 2005 May; 21(9):1995-2000. PubMed ID: 15691855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Characterizing dye bias in microarray experiments.
    Dobbin KK; Kawasaki ES; Petersen DW; Simon RM
    Bioinformatics; 2005 May; 21(10):2430-7. PubMed ID: 15774555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluating the performance of microarray segmentation algorithms.
    Lehmussola A; Ruusuvuori P; Yli-Harja O
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Dec; 22(23):2910-7. PubMed ID: 17032673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Background correction for cDNA microarray images using the TV+L1 model.
    Yin W; Chen T; Zhou SX; Chakraborty A
    Bioinformatics; 2005 May; 21(10):2410-6. PubMed ID: 15728112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Some statistical issues in microarray gene expression data.
    Mayo MS; Gajewski BJ; Morris JS
    Radiat Res; 2006 Jun; 165(6):745-8. PubMed ID: 16802876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. MicroPreP: a cDNA microarray data pre-processing framework.
    van Hijum SA; García de la Nava J; Trelles O; Kok J; Kuipers OP
    Appl Bioinformatics; 2003; 2(4):241-4. PubMed ID: 15130795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Statistical estimation of gene expression using multiple laser scans of microarrays.
    Khondoker MR; Glasbey CA; Worton BJ
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Jan; 22(2):215-9. PubMed ID: 16303798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Improving gene quantification by adjustable spot-image restoration.
    Daskalakis A; Cavouras D; Bougioukos P; Kostopoulos S; Glotsos D; Kalatzis I; Kagadis GC; Argyropoulos C; Nikiforidis G
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Sep; 23(17):2265-72. PubMed ID: 17599935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Removal of hybridization and scanning noise from microarrays.
    Gopalappa C; Das TK; Enkemann S; Eschrich S
    IEEE Trans Nanobioscience; 2009 Sep; 8(3):210-8. PubMed ID: 20051337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A new outlier removal approach for cDNA microarray normalization.
    Wu Y; Yan L; Liu H; Sun H; Xie H
    Biotechniques; 2009 Aug; 47(2):691-2, 694-700. PubMed ID: 19737130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Correlation statistics for cDNA microarray image analysis.
    Nagarajan R; Upreti M
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2006; 3(3):232-8. PubMed ID: 17048461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Segmentation and intensity estimation of microarray images using a gamma-t mixture model.
    Baek J; Son YS; McLachlan GJ
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Feb; 23(4):458-65. PubMed ID: 17166856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Integration of statistical inference methods and a novel control measure to improve sensitivity and specificity of data analysis in expression profiling studies.
    Zang S; Guo R; Zhang L; Lu Y
    J Biomed Inform; 2007 Oct; 40(5):552-60. PubMed ID: 17317331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A robust neural networks approach for spatial and intensity-dependent normalization of cDNA microarray data.
    Tarca AL; Cooke JE; Mackay J
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Jun; 21(11):2674-83. PubMed ID: 15797913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clusterv: a tool for assessing the reliability of clusters discovered in DNA microarray data.
    Valentini G
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Feb; 22(3):369-70. PubMed ID: 16332708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Use of within-array replicate spots for assessing differential expression in microarray experiments.
    Smyth GK; Michaud J; Scott HS
    Bioinformatics; 2005 May; 21(9):2067-75. PubMed ID: 15657102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Exploiting sample variability to enhance multivariate analysis of microarray data.
    Möller-Levet CS; West CM; Miller CJ
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Oct; 23(20):2733-40. PubMed ID: 17827205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Joint estimation of calibration and expression for high-density oligonucleotide arrays.
    Oberg AL; Mahoney DW; Ballman KV; Therneau TM
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Oct; 22(19):2381-7. PubMed ID: 16877757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.