These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1594187)

  • 1. Increased sensitivity with decreased numbers of test points and decreased test field size in automated perimetry of normal subjects.
    Fujimoto N; Adachi-Usami E
    Ophthalmologica; 1992; 204(2):88-92. PubMed ID: 1594187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of number of test points in automated perimetry.
    Fujimoto N; Adachi-Usami E
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1992 Mar; 113(3):317-20. PubMed ID: 1543226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of number of test points and size of test field in automated perimetry.
    Fujimoto N; Adachi-Usami E
    Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh); 1992 Jun; 70(3):323-6. PubMed ID: 1636391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Threshold-oriented suprathreshold perimetry and threshold value perimetry with the Tübigen CC Automated Perimeter. A comparative study].
    Wohlrab TM; Kreinberger H; Erb C; Stübiger N; Dorner-schandl F; Thiel HJ
    Ophthalmologe; 1998 Feb; 95(2):92-9. PubMed ID: 9545786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of test field size on the results of automated perimetry in normal subjects and patients with optic neuritis.
    Fujimoto N; Adachi-Usami E
    Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh); 1991 Jun; 69(3):367-70. PubMed ID: 1927321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Automatic perimetry of the central visual field in diseases of the macula].
    Janknecht P; Soriano JM; Funk J; Hansen LL
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1991 Oct; 199(4):259-63. PubMed ID: 1762351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A visual field quantification system for the Goldmann Perimeter.
    Odaka T; Fujisawa K; Akazawa K; Sakamoto M; Kinukawa N; Kamakura T; Nishioka Y; Itasaka H; Watanabe Y; Nose Y
    J Med Syst; 1992 Aug; 16(4):161-9. PubMed ID: 1460401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Modification of an automated perimeter for dark- and light-adapted perimetry].
    Yagasaki K; Awaya S; Jacobson SG
    Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 1990 Dec; 94(12):1162-8. PubMed ID: 2082736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Computer perimetry of glaucomatous visual field defects at different stimulus sizes (author's transl)].
    Gramer E; Kontić D; Krieglstein GK
    Ophthalmologica; 1981; 183(3):162-7. PubMed ID: 7312301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [The influence of target blurring and simulated opacity of the ocular media on automated perimetric thresholds].
    Uyama K; Matsumoto C; Okuyama S; Otori T
    Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 1993 Aug; 97(8):994-1001. PubMed ID: 8368190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Age-adjusted normal values with the Tübingen Automatic Perimeter TAP 2000 CC].
    Wohlrab TM; Erb C; Rohrbach JM; Thiel HJ
    Ophthalmologe; 1996 Aug; 93(4):428-32. PubMed ID: 8963142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Learning effect and repeatability of automated kinetic perimetry in healthy participants.
    Hirasawa K; Shoji N
    Curr Eye Res; 2014 Sep; 39(9):928-37. PubMed ID: 24588228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Visual acuity perimetry. Detection of glaucomatous visual field defects].
    Reiser EM; Lachenmayr BJ; Vivell PM
    Ophthalmologe; 1992 Dec; 89(6):472-6. PubMed ID: 1486263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Use of a portable head mounted perimetry system to assess bedside visual fields.
    Hollander DA; Volpe NJ; Moster ML; Liu GT; Balcer LJ; Judy KD; Galetta SL
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2000 Oct; 84(10):1185-90. PubMed ID: 11004108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Variation of sensitivity in the central visual field by the range of measurement].
    Fujimoto N
    Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 1990 Apr; 94(4):404-7. PubMed ID: 2396590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Relation between relative afferent pupillary defect and suprathreshold automated perimetry].
    Wilhelm H; Meilinger S; Apfelstedt E
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1997 Jun; 210(6):365-9. PubMed ID: 9333662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Indications for stimulus 3 and 5 in automatic perimetry. Preliminary results].
    Zulauf M; Caprioli J
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1994 May; 204(5):407-8. PubMed ID: 8051884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The normal visual field on the Humphrey field analyzer.
    Brenton RS; Phelps CD
    Ophthalmologica; 1986; 193(1-2):56-74. PubMed ID: 3822395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [A comparison of central visual field measurement by automated perimetry in optic neuritis due to multiple sclerosis and of unknown etiology].
    Fujimoto N
    Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 May; 93(5):581-6. PubMed ID: 2801361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Data bank for analysis of the normal visual field using the 30/1 central program of the automated Humphrey perimeter].
    Béchetoille A; Dykman P; Muratet JY
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 1986; 9(12):837-41. PubMed ID: 3571842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.