317 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1594216)
1. Enhancement and demyelination of the intraorbital optic nerve. Fat suppression magnetic resonance imaging.
Guy J; Mao J; Bidgood WD; Mancuso A; Quisling RG
Ophthalmology; 1992 May; 99(5):713-9. PubMed ID: 1594216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Intraorbital optic nerve and experimental optic neuritis. Correlation of fat suppression magnetic resonance imaging and electron microscopy.
Guy J; Fitzsimmons J; Ellis EA; Beck B; Mancuso A
Ophthalmology; 1992 May; 99(5):720-5. PubMed ID: 1594217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The role of fat-suppression technique and gadopentetate dimeglumine in magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of intraocular tumors and simulating lesions.
De Potter P; Flanders AE; Shields JA; Shields CL; Gonzales CF; Rao VM
Arch Ophthalmol; 1994 Mar; 112(3):340-8. PubMed ID: 8129659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. MR imaging of optic nerve lesions: value of gadopentetate dimeglumine and fat-suppression technique.
Hendrix LE; Kneeland JB; Haughton VM; Daniels DL; Szumowski J; Williams AL; Mark LP; Czervionke LF
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1990; 11(4):749-54. PubMed ID: 2114763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Optimizing brain MR imaging protocols with gadopentetate dimeglumine: enhancement of intracranial lesions on spin-density- and T2-weighted images.
Wessbecher FW; Maravilla KR; Dalley RW
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1991; 12(4):675-9. PubMed ID: 1882743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Intra- and paraorbital lesions: value of fat-suppression MR imaging with paramagnetic contrast enhancement.
Tien RD; Chu PK; Hesselink JR; Szumowski J
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1991; 12(2):245-53. PubMed ID: 1902021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fat-suppressed MR of the orbit and cavernous sinus: comparison of fast spin-echo and conventional spin-echo.
Mukherji SK; Tart RP; Fitzsimmons J; Belden C; McGorray S; Guy J; Mancuso AA
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1994 Oct; 15(9):1707-14. PubMed ID: 7847218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Magnetization transfer or spin-lock? An investigation of off-resonance saturation pulse imaging with varying frequency offsets.
Ulmer JL; Mathews VP; Hamilton CA; Elster AD; Moran PR
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1996 May; 17(5):805-19. PubMed ID: 8733952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Availability of frequency-selective fat-saturation pulse (Fat-Sat) MRI in childhood optic neuritis.
Takanashi J; Sugita K; Matsubayashi J; Sato K; Niimi H
Pediatr Neurol; 1996 Jan; 14(1):64-5. PubMed ID: 8652020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Magnetic resonance imaging of optic nerve meningiomas. Enhancement with gadolinium-DTPA.
Zimmerman CF; Schatz NJ; Glaser JS
Ophthalmology; 1990 May; 97(5):585-91. PubMed ID: 2342803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. MR imaging of optic nerve lesions: value of gadopentetate dimeglumine and fat-suppression technique.
Hendrix LE; Kneeland JB; Haughton VM; Daniels DL; Szumowski J; Williams AL; Mark LP; Czervionke LF
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1990 Oct; 155(4):849-54. PubMed ID: 2119121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Gadolinium-DTPA-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in optic neuropathies.
Guy J; Mancuso A; Quisling RG; Beck R; Moster M
Ophthalmology; 1990 May; 97(5):592-9; discussion 599-600. PubMed ID: 2342804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled imaging of the liver: pulse sequence optimization and comparison with spin-echo MR imaging.
Low RN; Francis IR; Herfkens RJ; Jeffrey RB; Glazer GM; Foo TK; Shimakawa A; Pelc NJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Mar; 160(3):501-9. PubMed ID: 8381572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quantitative contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the optic nerve.
Simon JH; Rubinstein D; Brown M; Yuh W; Birch-Iensen M; Szumowski J; Stears J
Acta Radiol; 1994 Nov; 35(6):526-31. PubMed ID: 7946672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Rectal carcinoma: prospective comparison of conventional and gadopentetate dimeglumine enhanced fat-suppressed MR imaging.
Okizuka H; Sugimura K; Yoshizako T; Kaji Y; Wada A
J Magn Reson Imaging; 1996; 6(3):465-71. PubMed ID: 8724412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Detection and staging of chondromalacia patellae: relative efficacies of conventional MR imaging, MR arthrography, and CT arthrography.
Gagliardi JA; Chung EM; Chandnani VP; Kesling KL; Christensen KP; Null RN; Radvany MG; Hansen MF
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Sep; 163(3):629-36. PubMed ID: 8079858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. MR fat suppression combined with Gd-DTPA enhancement in optic neuritis and perineuritis.
Tien RD; Hesselink JR; Szumowski J
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1991; 15(2):223-7. PubMed ID: 2002098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [The MRT of the orbit: the value of T1-weighted frequency-selective fat saturation at 1.0 and 1.5 tesla].
Link TM; Reimer P; Rummeny EJ; Schuierer G; Grenzebach U; Peters PE
Rofo; 1995 Nov; 163(5):406-10. PubMed ID: 8527754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Diagnostic value of gadopentetate dimeglumine for 1.5-T MR imaging of musculoskeletal masses: comparison with unenhanced T1- and T2-weighted imaging.
Rosenthal RE; Wozney P
J Magn Reson Imaging; 1991; 1(5):547-51. PubMed ID: 1790379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Non-T1-weighted spin-echo MR imaging with contrast material: experimental and preliminary clinical assessment.
Mihara F; Gupta KL; Righi AM
Radiat Med; 1994; 12(5):209-12. PubMed ID: 7863024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
