These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15942500)

  • 21. Integrated orbital implants--a comparison of hydroxyapatite and porous polyethylene implants.
    Sadiq SA; Mengher LS; Lowry J; Downes R
    Orbit; 2008; 27(1):37-40. PubMed ID: 18307145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Enucleation with unwrapped porous and nonporous orbital implants: a 15-year experience.
    Trichopoulos N; Augsburger JJ
    Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2005 Sep; 21(5):331-6. PubMed ID: 16234693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Problems after evisceration surgery with porous orbital implants: experience with 86 patients.
    Jordan DR
    Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2004 Sep; 20(5):374-80. PubMed ID: 15377905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The Molteno M-Sphere.
    Jordan DR; Hwang I; Brownstein S; McEachren T; Gilberg S; Grahovac S; Mawn L
    Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2000 Sep; 16(5):356-62. PubMed ID: 11021385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Vascularization of coralline versus synthetic hydroxyapatite orbital implants assessed by gadolinium enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.
    Celik T; Yuksel D; Kosker M; Kasim R; Simsek S
    Curr Eye Res; 2015 Mar; 40(3):346-53. PubMed ID: 24871378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of early fibrovascular proliferation according to orbital implant in orbital floor fracture reconstruction.
    Lee H; Baek S
    J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Sep; 23(5):1518-23. PubMed ID: 22976649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of vascularization of Medpor and Medpor-Plus orbital implants: a prospective, randomized study.
    Naik MN; Murthy RK; Honavar SG
    Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2007; 23(6):463-7. PubMed ID: 18030118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Fibrovascular ingrowth into hydroxyapatite and porous polyethylene orbital implants wrapped with acellular dermis.
    Thakker MM; Fay AM; Pieroth L; Rubin PA
    Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2004 Sep; 20(5):368-73. PubMed ID: 15377904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Porous and nonporous orbital implants for treating the anophthalmic socket: A meta-analysis of case series studies.
    Schellini S; Jorge E; Sousa R; Burroughs J; El-Dib R
    Orbit; 2016; 35(2):78-86. PubMed ID: 26928263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Exposure rate of hydroxyapatite orbital implants a 15-year experience of 802 cases.
    Yoon JS; Lew H; Kim SJ; Lee SY
    Ophthalmology; 2008 Mar; 115(3):566-572.e2. PubMed ID: 17854900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Porous orbital implants in enucleation: a systematic review.
    Chalasani R; Poole-Warren L; Conway RM; Ben-Nissan B
    Surv Ophthalmol; 2007; 52(2):145-55. PubMed ID: 17355854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Brazilian hydroxyapatite implant.
    Jordan DR; Hwang I; McEachren T; Brownstein S; Gilberg S; Grahovac S; Mawn L
    Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2000 Sep; 16(5):363-9. PubMed ID: 11021386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Primary placement of a titanium motility post in a porous polyethylene orbital implant: animal model with quantitative assessment of fibrovascular ingrowth and vascular density.
    Hsu WC; Green JP; Spilker MH; Rubin PA
    Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2000 Sep; 16(5):370-9. PubMed ID: 11021387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Autogenous temporalis fascia patch graft for porous polyethylene (Medpor) sphere orbital implant exposure.
    Sagoo MS; Olver JM
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2004 Jul; 88(7):942-6. PubMed ID: 15205243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Synthetic hydroxyapatite orbital implants: a clinical and MRI evaluation.
    Sarvananthan N; Liddicoat AJ; Fahy GT
    Eye (Lond); 1999 Apr; 13 ( Pt 2)():205-8. PubMed ID: 10450382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Re: "comparison of the exposure rate of wrapped hydroxyapatite (Bio-Eye) versus unwrapped porous polyethylene (Medpor) orbital implants in enucleated patients".
    Nasser QJ; Blaydon SM; Connor MA; Nakra T; Shepler TR; Neuhaus RW; Shore JW
    Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2011; 27(5):391; author reply 391-2. PubMed ID: 21904174
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Improved mechanical properties of hydroxyapatite whisker-reinforced poly(L-lactic acid) scaffold by surface modification of hydroxyapatite.
    Fang Z; Feng Q
    Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2014 Feb; 35():190-4. PubMed ID: 24411368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Safety of unwrapped spherical orbital implants.
    Perry JD; Tam RC
    Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2004 Jul; 20(4):281-4. PubMed ID: 15266141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Hematic cyst in a barrier-covered porous polyethylene/titanium mesh orbital floor implant.
    Mihora LD; Holck DE
    Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2011; 27(5):e117-8. PubMed ID: 21346673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Clinical analysis of hydroxyapatite orbital implantation after ocular trauma in 211 cases.
    Liang T; Zhao GQ; Meng XX; Zhang LY
    Chin J Traumatol; 2006 Oct; 9(5):282-7. PubMed ID: 17026860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.