These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

780 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15942618)

  • 21. Adhesion of indirect MOD resin composite inlays luted with self-adhesive and self-etching resin cements.
    Inukai T; Abe T; Ito Y; Pilecki P; Wilson RF; Watson TF; Foxton RM
    Oper Dent; 2012; 37(5):474-84. PubMed ID: 22360367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Retention of zirconium oxide ceramic crowns with three types of cement.
    Palacios RP; Johnson GH; Phillips KM; Raigrodski AJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Aug; 96(2):104-14. PubMed ID: 16911887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Influence of cement type on the marginal adaptation of all-ceramic MOD inlays.
    Rosentritt M; Behr M; Lang R; Handel G
    Dent Mater; 2004 Jun; 20(5):463-9. PubMed ID: 15081553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of composite resin versus ceramic inlays in molars.
    Dejak B; Mlotkowski A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 18262014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Microleakage of CAD-CAM porcelain restorations.
    LoPresti JT; David S; Calamia JR
    Am J Dent; 1996 Feb; 9(1):37-9. PubMed ID: 9002814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Fracture load of composite resin and feldspathic all-ceramic CAD/CAM crowns.
    Attia A; Abdelaziz KM; Freitag S; Kern M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Feb; 95(2):117-23. PubMed ID: 16473085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The influence of adhesive luting systems on bond strength and failure mode of an indirect micro ceramic resin-based composite veneer.
    Sarabi N; Ghavamnasiri M; Forooghbakhsh A
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 Jan; 10(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 19142254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Marginal leakage of combinations of glass-ionomer and composite resin restorations.
    Sarne S; Mante MO; Mante FK
    J Clin Dent; 1996; 7(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 9238879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Marginal integrity of partial ceramic crowns within dentin with different luting techniques and materials.
    Schenke F; Hiller KA; Schmalz G; Federlin M
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(5):516-25. PubMed ID: 18833858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effect of axial load and temperature cycling on microleakage of resin restorations.
    Rigsby DF; Retief DH; Bidez MW; Russell CM
    Am J Dent; 1992 Jun; 5(3):155-9. PubMed ID: 1388955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Microleakage of a composite inlay system.
    Scott JA; Saunders WP; Strang R
    Am J Dent; 1992 Aug; 5(4):177-80. PubMed ID: 1290604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Microleakage of Class II box-type composite restorations.
    Opdam NJ; Roeters JJ; Burgersdijk RC
    Am J Dent; 1998 Aug; 11(4):160-4. PubMed ID: 10388369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Microleakage and cusp fracture resistance of heat-treated composite resin inlays.
    Wendt SL
    Am J Dent; 1991 Feb; 4(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 2003891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Marginal adaptation and microtensile bond strength of composite indirect restorations bonded to dentin treated with adhesive and low-viscosity composite.
    de Andrade OS; de Goes MF; Montes MA
    Dent Mater; 2007 Mar; 23(3):279-87. PubMed ID: 16546249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. An in-vitro investigation of microleakage and gap size of glass ionomer/composite resin "sandwich" restorations in primary teeth.
    Reid JS; Saunders WP; Sharkey SW; Williams CE
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1994; 61(4):255-9. PubMed ID: 7989627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Microleakage of different cementation techniques in Class V ceramic inlays.
    Ozturk AN; Ozturk B; Aykent F
    J Oral Rehabil; 2004 Dec; 31(12):1192-6. PubMed ID: 15544655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Reducing microleakage in Class II restorations: an in vitro study.
    Crim GA; Chapman KW
    Quintessence Int; 1994 Nov; 25(11):781-5. PubMed ID: 7568683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Microleakage of IPS empress 2 inlay restorations luted with self-adhesive resin cements.
    Cal E; Celik EU; Turkun M
    Oper Dent; 2012; 37(4):417-24. PubMed ID: 22360365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Marginal quality of tooth-colored restorations in class II cavities after artificial aging.
    Manhart J; Schmidt M; Chen HY; Kunzelmann KH; Hickel R
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(4):357-66. PubMed ID: 11504435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. In vitro push-out strength of seven luting agents to dentin.
    Cheylan JM; Gonthier S; Degrange M
    Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(4):365-70. PubMed ID: 12170851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 39.