171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15943021)
21. Participants' responsibilities in clinical research.
Resnik DB; Ness E
J Med Ethics; 2012 Dec; 38(12):746-50. PubMed ID: 22822200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Response to open peer commentaries on "assessing the remedy: the case for contracts in clinical trials".
Edwards SJ
Am J Bioeth; 2011 Apr; 11(4):W1-3. PubMed ID: 21480062
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. [Clinical trials in developing countries: who should define ethics?].
Béréterbide F; Hirsch F
Bull Soc Pathol Exot; 2008 Apr; 101(2):102-5. PubMed ID: 18543701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Legal and ethical aspects of clinical trials: the views of researchers.
Ferguson PR
Med Law Rev; 2003; 11(1):48-66. PubMed ID: 14606472
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Should Participants in Clinical Trials Be Able to Withdraw from Passive Follow-Up?
Capell WH; Wynia MK; Hurley EA; Bonaca MP
Ethics Hum Res; 2021 Jan; 43(1):32-36. PubMed ID: 33463078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Can contracts enhance participant autonomy in clinical trials?
Buccafurni D
Am J Bioeth; 2011 Apr; 11(4):24-5. PubMed ID: 21480070
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Basic ethical principles in the conduct of biomedical and behavioral research involving human subjects.
Engelhardt HT
Tex Rep Biol Med; 1979; 38():139-68. PubMed ID: 531757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Protection of research subjects: do special rules apply in epidemiology?
Capron AM
Law Med Health Care; 1991; 19(3-4):184-90. PubMed ID: 11642953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Agreement to participate in research: is that a promise?
Newton LH
IRB; 1984; 6(2):7-9. PubMed ID: 11649539
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. What it takes to defend deceptive placebo use.
Barnhill A
Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 2011 Sep; 21(3):219-50. PubMed ID: 22073816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Autonomy, beneficence, and the experimental subject's consent: a response to Jay Katz.
Pellegrino ED
St Louis Univ Law J; 1993; 38(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 11656324
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Respecting autonomy without disclosing information.
Walker T
Bioethics; 2013 Sep; 27(7):388-94. PubMed ID: 22486227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Research participation as a contract.
Lawson C
Ethics Behav; 1995; 5(3):205-15. PubMed ID: 11660017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Free-riding and research ethics.
Allhoff F
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):50-1; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036662
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Beginning anew: same principles, different direction for research ethics.
Simmerling M; Schwegler B
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):44-6; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036659
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Precautionary harm disclosure in clinical trials.
Wu KC
Am J Bioeth; 2009 Aug; 9(8):43-5. PubMed ID: 19998161
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. On the Alleged Right to Participate in High-Risk Research.
Różyńska J
Bioethics; 2015 Sep; 29(7):451-61. PubMed ID: 25644532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Does uncle Sam really want you? A response to "Rethinking research Ethics" by Rosamond Rhodes (AJOB 5:1).
Trachtman H
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):W22-3. PubMed ID: 16036645
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Improving subject recruitment by maintaining truly informed consent: a practical benefit of disclosing adverse clinical trial results.
Shah KR; Batzer FR
Am J Bioeth; 2009 Aug; 9(8):36-7. PubMed ID: 19998157
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Broadening consent--and diluting ethics?
Hofmann B
J Med Ethics; 2009 Feb; 35(2):125-9. PubMed ID: 19181887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
