165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15943984)
1. Recurrent smear abnormalities where repeat loop treatment is not possible: is hysterectomy the answer?
Das N; Naik R; Jackson S; De Barros Lopes A; Monaghan JM; Godfrey KA; Hatem MH
Gynecol Oncol; 2005 Jun; 97(3):751-4. PubMed ID: 15943984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cytological follow-up of women older than 50 years with high-grade cervical smear treated by large loop excision.
Das N; Sutton V; Bevan J; Brinkmann D; Woolas R
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2009 Jul; 13(3):165-8. PubMed ID: 19550214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Predictive factors for residual disease in the uterine cervix after large loop excision of the transformation zone in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia III.
Hamontri S; Israngura N; Rochanawutanon M; Bullangpoti S; Tangtrakul S
J Med Assoc Thai; 2010 Feb; 93 Suppl 2():S74-80. PubMed ID: 21299083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Predictive factors used to justify hysterectomy after loop conization: increasing age and severity of disease.
Kalogirou D; Antoniou G; Karakitsos P; Botsis D; Kalogirou O; Giannikos L
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 1997; 18(2):113-6. PubMed ID: 9105859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Predictive factors for residual disease in hysterectomy specimens after conization in early-stage cervical cancer.
Wong AS; Li WH; Cheung TH
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Apr; 199():21-6. PubMed ID: 26894378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Study on high risk factors associated with positive margin of cervix conization in patient with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia].
Lu HX; Chen YX; Ni J; Wan XY; Lü WG; Xie X
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Mar; 44(3):200-3. PubMed ID: 19570446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Electrosurgical loop excision of the cervical transformation zone: the experience of family physicians.
Ferris DG; Hainer BL; Pfenninger JL; Zuber TJ; DeWitt DE; Line RL
J Fam Pract; 1995 Oct; 41(4):337-44. PubMed ID: 7561706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The appropriateness of examining the entire cervix histologically in hysterectomy specimens from women with a previous history of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia or dyskaryosis.
Greene A; Heatley MK
J Clin Pathol; 2001 Feb; 54(2):155-7. PubMed ID: 11215286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Repeat surgery in patients with cervical cancer stage FIGO IA1: a series of 156 cases and a review of the literature.
Hefler LA; Polterauer S; Schneitter A; Concin N; Hofstetter G; Bentz E; Leipold H; Tempfer C; Reinthaller A
Anticancer Res; 2010 Feb; 30(2):565-8. PubMed ID: 20332471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Management of stage Ia1 squamous cervical cancer and the importance of excision margins: a retrospective study of long-term outcome after 25 years of follow-up.
Papakonstantinou K; Kyrgiou M; Lyons D; Soutter WP; Ghaem-Maghami S
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Dec; 211(6):625.e1-6. PubMed ID: 24949540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Residual and recurrent lesions after conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3.
Milojkovic M
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2002 Jan; 76(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 11818094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The efficacy of conservative management after conization in patients with stage IA1 microinvasive cervical carcinoma.
Lee SW; Kim YM; Son WS; You HJ; Kim DY; Kim JH; Kim YT; Nam JH
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2009; 88(2):209-15. PubMed ID: 19093236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Diagnosis and treatment value of colposcopy and loop electrosurgical excision procedure in microinvasive cervical cancer: analysis of 135 cases].
Xiao FY; Wang Q; Zheng RL; Chen M; Su TT; Sui L
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Mar; 51(3):186-91. PubMed ID: 27030497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dysplastic endocervical curettings: a predictor of cervical squamous cell carcinoma.
Temkin SM; Hellmann M; Lee YC; Abulafia O
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 May; 196(5):469.e1-4. PubMed ID: 17466706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Conization non in sano].
Lahousen M; Pickel H; Girardi F; Jäger G
Gynakol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch; 1992; 32 Suppl 1():131. PubMed ID: 1286317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Outcome after conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade III: relation with surgical margins, extension to the crypts and mitoses.
Maluf PJ; Adad SJ; Murta EF
Tumori; 2004; 90(5):473-7. PubMed ID: 15656332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) with colposcopic biopsy and efficacy of loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP).
Duesing N; Schwarz J; Choschzick M; Jaenicke F; Gieseking F; Issa R; Mahner S; Woelber L
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Dec; 286(6):1549-54. PubMed ID: 22865036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An Abnormal Precone Endocervical Curettage Result Is an Independent Risk Factor for Positive Margins in Conization Specimens.
An J; Lei H; Xie X; Sun P
Oncol Res Treat; 2020; 43(10):518-525. PubMed ID: 32772026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The borderline cervical smear: colposcopic and biopsy outcome.
al-Nafussi A; Rebello G; al-Yusif R; McGoogan E
J Clin Pathol; 2000 Jun; 53(6):439-44. PubMed ID: 10911801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Detection of occult endocervical glandular dysplasia in cervical conization specimens for squamous lesions.
Sopracordevole F; Clemente N; Alessandrini L; Di Giuseppe J; Cigolot F; Buttignol M; Ciavattini A; Canzonieri V
Pathol Res Pract; 2017 Mar; 213(3):210-216. PubMed ID: 28214204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
