These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1594433)

  • 1. What makes targets redundant?
    Grice GR; Reed JM
    Percept Psychophys; 1992 May; 51(5):437-42. PubMed ID: 1594433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Redundancy phenomena are affected by response requirements.
    Grice GR; Canham L
    Percept Psychophys; 1990 Sep; 48(3):209-13. PubMed ID: 2216647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Processing redundant signals: coactivation, divided attention, or what?
    Eriksen CW; Goettl B; St James JD; Fournier LR
    Percept Psychophys; 1989 Apr; 45(4):356-70. PubMed ID: 2710636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Coactivation in the perception of redundant targets.
    Fournier LR; Eriksen CW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1990 Aug; 16(3):538-50. PubMed ID: 2144569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Channel interaction and the redundant-targets effect in bimodal divided attention.
    Miller J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1991 Feb; 17(1):160-9. PubMed ID: 1826309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Information processed from brief visual displays by learning-disabled boys.
    Blackwell SL; McIntyre CW; Murray ME
    Child Dev; 1983 Aug; 54(4):927-40. PubMed ID: 6617311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Involuntary attentional capture by abrupt onsets.
    Remington RW; Johnston JC; Yantis S
    Percept Psychophys; 1992 Mar; 51(3):279-90. PubMed ID: 1561053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effects of location cuing on redundant-target processing.
    Theeuwes J
    Psychol Res; 1994; 57(1):15-9. PubMed ID: 7824681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Redundancy gains in simple responses and go/no-go tasks.
    Gondan M; Götze C; Greenlee MW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Aug; 72(6):1692-709. PubMed ID: 20675811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of redundant auditory stimuli on reaction time.
    Schröter H; Ulich R; Miller J
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2007 Feb; 14(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 17546729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Crowding affects letters and symbols differently.
    Grainger J; Tydgat I; Isselé J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Jun; 36(3):673-88. PubMed ID: 20515197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. On the locus of redundancy effects in a letter-detection task.
    Rueckl JG; Suzuki S; Yeh SL
    Percept Psychophys; 1991 May; 49(5):412-21. PubMed ID: 2057307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Matching performance and the similarity structure of the stimulus set.
    Crist WB
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1981 Sep; 110(3):269-96. PubMed ID: 6457077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Recognition of rotated letters: extracting invariance across successive and simultaneous stimuli.
    Koriat A; Norman J; Kimchi R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1991 May; 17(2):444-57. PubMed ID: 1830087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Differentiation of holistic processing in the time course of letter recognition.
    Lachmann T; van Leeuwen C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Sep; 129(1):121-9. PubMed ID: 18586218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reducing the effects of adjacent distractors by narrowing attention.
    LaBerge D; Brown V; Carter M; Bash D; Hartley A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1991 Feb; 17(1):65-76. PubMed ID: 1826323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Negative priming in same-different matching: further evidence for a central locus of inhibition.
    Neill WT; Lissner LS; Beck JL
    Percept Psychophys; 1990 Oct; 48(4):398-400. PubMed ID: 2243764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Absence of distracting information explains the redundant signals effect for a centrally presented categorization task.
    Mishler AD; Neider MB
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2017 Nov; 181():18-26. PubMed ID: 29028518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Where similarity beats redundancy: the importance of context, higher order similarity, and response assignment.
    Eidels A; Townsend JT; Pomerantz JR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Dec; 34(6):1441-63. PubMed ID: 19045985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Foveal-to-peripheral priming in letter identification reflects response bias, not enhanced visibility.
    Laarni J; Nyman G
    Scand J Psychol; 1996 Dec; 37(4):394-406. PubMed ID: 8931394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.