BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15944657)

  • 1. Chemistry society goes head to head with NIH in fight over public database.
    Marris E
    Nature; 2005 Jun; 435(7043):718-9. PubMed ID: 15944657
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. American Chemical Society: chemical reaction.
    Marris E
    Nature; 2005 Oct; 437(7060):807-9. PubMed ID: 16208339
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Biomedical policy. House approves 0.5% raise for NIH, comments on database.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 2005 Jun; 308(5729):1729. PubMed ID: 15961642
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Scientific databases. NIH, chemical society look for common ground.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 2005 Sep; 309(5740):1473. PubMed ID: 16141038
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Science resources. Chemists want NIH to curtail database.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 2005 May; 308(5723):774. PubMed ID: 15879180
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. NIH offers free access to wealth of disease data.
    Russo G
    Nature; 2006 Dec; 444(7122):982. PubMed ID: 17183282
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. NIH head stands firm over plans for open access.
    Wadman M
    Nature; 2004 Nov; 432(7016):424. PubMed ID: 15565114
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. NIH Molecular Libraries Initiative.
    Austin CP; Brady LS; Insel TR; Collins FS
    Science; 2004 Nov; 306(5699):1138-9. PubMed ID: 15542455
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Scientific publishing. Congress puts similar heat on NIH.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 2004 Jul; 305(5683):458. PubMed ID: 15273365
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sale of public databases puts biological data at risk.
    Cuticchia AJ; Silk GW
    Nature; 2005 Jun; 435(7045):1028. PubMed ID: 15973381
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Databases in peril.
    Nat Cell Biol; 2005 Jul; 7(7):639. PubMed ID: 15990889
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Making research accessible: National Institutes of Health (NIH) public access and PNAS open access policies.
    Cozzarelli NR
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2005 Apr; 102(15):5303. PubMed ID: 15809413
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Scientific meetings. NIH scientists in a spin over foreign travel.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 2004 Jul; 305(5683):462. PubMed ID: 15273370
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Report of the AFCR Public Policy Committee: current issues in public policy.
    Firth B; Hait WN
    Clin Res; 1988 Oct; 36(6):559-61. PubMed ID: 3180685
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biomedical agency floats open-access plan.
    Brumfiel G
    Nature; 2004 Sep; 431(7005):115. PubMed ID: 15356593
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. ASPB's response to NIH's public access policy.
    Jorgensen RA; Raikhel NV; Ort D
    Plant Cell; 2005 Jun; 17(6):1637. PubMed ID: 15929977
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. SBIR program. Researchers fight against bigger slice to small business.
    Mervis J
    Science; 2009 Jul; 325(5936):18. PubMed ID: 19574355
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. APS comments on the NIH public access proposal.
    Physiologist; 2004 Dec; 47(6):462-3. PubMed ID: 15672895
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The database revolution.
    Nature; 2007 Jan; 445(7125):229-30. PubMed ID: 17230150
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Conflict of interest. NIH chief clamps down on consulting and stock ownership.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 2005 Feb; 307(5711):824-5. PubMed ID: 15705811
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.