These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15944675)
1. Veracity of raw images can also come into question. Adler J Nature; 2005 Jun; 435(7043):736. PubMed ID: 15944675 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Virtual slides in fundamental and clinical research]. Janin A; Legrès L; Leboeuf C; Scoazec JY; Bertheau P Med Sci (Paris); 2012 Nov; 28(11):990-2. PubMed ID: 23171905 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Use of Autostitch for automatic stitching of microscope images. Ma B; Zimmermann T; Rohde M; Winkelbach S; He F; Lindenmaier W; Dittmar KE Micron; 2007; 38(5):492-9. PubMed ID: 17045805 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Image quality characteristics of a novel colour scanning digital ophthalmoscope (SDO) compared with fundus photography. Strauss RW; Krieglstein TR; Priglinger SG; Reis W; Ulbig MW; Kampik A; Neubauer AS Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2007 Nov; 27(6):611-8. PubMed ID: 17956367 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessment of accuracy and precision of quantification of ultra-widefield images. Sagong M; van Hemert J; Olmos de Koo LC; Barnett C; Sadda SR Ophthalmology; 2015 Apr; 122(4):864-6. PubMed ID: 25576995 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Automatic segmentation of the sequential images of neural stem cell based on geometric active contour]. Liu J; Zhao C Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Oct; 25(5):994-7. PubMed ID: 19024433 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Objective assessment of the accuracy of computer-simulated imaging in rhinoplasty. Adelson RT; DeFatta RJ; Bassischis BA Am J Otolaryngol; 2008; 29(3):151-5. PubMed ID: 18439946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. High throughput microscopy: from raw images to discoveries. Wollman R; Stuurman N J Cell Sci; 2007 Nov; 120(Pt 21):3715-22. PubMed ID: 17959627 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Practical digital photography in the dermatology office. Chilukuri S; Bhatia A Semin Cutan Med Surg; 2008 Mar; 27(1):83-5. PubMed ID: 18486028 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Computer-generated black-and-white tone/line negatives on color reversal film. Gray CA; McDermott E J Biol Photogr; 1993 Jan; 61(1):3-4. PubMed ID: 8425870 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Standardization in clinical photography at Addenbrooke's Hospital. Murdoch J J Vis Commun Med; 2005 Jun; 28(2):68-71. PubMed ID: 16298707 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Digital manipulation of pathologic images. Pritt B; Gibson P; Cooper K Int J Surg Pathol; 2006 Jan; 14(1):107. PubMed ID: 16501847 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Digital fundus image grading with the non-mydriatic Visucam(PRO NM) versus the FF450(plus) camera in diabetic retinopathy. Neubauer AS; Rothschuh A; Ulbig MW; Blum M Acta Ophthalmol; 2008 Mar; 86(2):177-82. PubMed ID: 17944975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]