These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15947223)

  • 1. An investigation into the use of two polyacid-modified composite resins (compomers) and a resin-modified glass poly(alkenoate) cement used to retain orthodontic bands.
    Williams PH; Sherriff M; Ireland AJ
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Jun; 27(3):245-51. PubMed ID: 15947223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In vitro comparison of orthodontic band cements.
    Millett DT; Duff S; Morrison L; Cummings A; Gilmour WH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Jan; 123(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 12532057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Modified composite or conventional glass ionomer for band cementation? A comparative clinical trial.
    Gillgrass TJ; Benington PC; Millett DT; Newell J; Gilmour WH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Jul; 120(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 11455377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An ex vivo evaluation of resin-modified glass polyalkenoates and polyacid-modified composite resins as orthodontic band cements.
    Knox J; Chye KY; Durning P
    J Orthod; 2004 Dec; 31(4):323-8; discussion 301-2. PubMed ID: 15608348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of shear-peel band strengths of 5 orthodontic cements.
    Aggarwal M; Foley TF; Rix D
    Angle Orthod; 2000 Aug; 70(4):308-16. PubMed ID: 10961781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of in-vitro bond strengths between resin-modified glass ionomer, polyacid-modified composite resin, and giomer adhesive systems.
    Chitnis D; Dunn WJ; Gonzales DA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Mar; 129(3):330.e11-6. PubMed ID: 16527626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Resin-modified glass ionomer, modified composite or conventional glass ionomer for band cementation?--an in vitro evaluation.
    Millett DT; Cummings A; Letters S; Roger E; Love J
    Eur J Orthod; 2003 Dec; 25(6):609-14. PubMed ID: 14700267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Enamel demineralization inhibition by cements at orthodontic band margins.
    VanMiller EJ; Donly KJ
    Am J Dent; 2003 Oct; 16(5):356-8. PubMed ID: 14677617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison between the shear bond strength of brackets bonded to glazed and deglazed porcelain surfaces with resin-reinforced glass-ionomer cement and a bis-GMA resin adhesive.
    Lifshitz AB; Cárdenas M
    World J Orthod; 2006; 7(2):134-7. PubMed ID: 16779971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Retention of orthodontic bands with three different cements.
    Kocadereli I; Ciger S
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1995; 19(2):127-30. PubMed ID: 7577731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Retention of zirconium oxide ceramic crowns with three types of cement.
    Palacios RP; Johnson GH; Phillips KM; Raigrodski AJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Aug; 96(2):104-14. PubMed ID: 16911887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Microleakage of orthodontic band cement at the cement-enamel and cement-band interfaces.
    Uysal T; Ramoglu SI; Ertas H; Ulker M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Apr; 137(4):534-9. PubMed ID: 20362915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Chlorhexidine-modified glass ionomer for band cementation? An in vitro study.
    Millett DT; Doubleday B; Alatsaris M; Love J; Wood D; Luther F; Devine D
    J Orthod; 2005 Mar; 32(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 15784942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An in vitro investigation into the use of resin-modified glass poly(alkenoate) cements as orthodontic bonding agents.
    Choo SC; Ireland AJ; Sherriff M
    Eur J Orthod; 2001 Jun; 23(3):243-52. PubMed ID: 11471267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of sandblasting on the retention of orthodontic bands.
    Wood DP; Paleczny GJ; Johnson LN
    Angle Orthod; 1996; 66(3):207-14. PubMed ID: 8805916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of high-intensity curing lights on microleakage under orthodontic bands.
    Uysal T; Ramoglu SI; Ulker M; Ertas H
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Aug; 138(2):201-7. PubMed ID: 20691362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of shear bond strength of composite, compomer and resin modified glass ionomer in primary and permanent teeth: an in vitro study.
    Prabhakar AR; Raj S; Raju OS
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2003 Sep; 21(3):86-94. PubMed ID: 14703213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. In-vitro study of resin-modified glass ionomer cements for cementation of orthodontic bands. Isolation, surplus removal and humidity as factors influencing the bond strength between enamel, cement and metal.
    Liebmann SM; Jost-Brinkmann PG
    J Orofac Orthop; 1999; 60(5):348-60. PubMed ID: 10546417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparative study of retentive strengths of zinc phosphate, polycarboxylate and glass ionomer cements with stainless steel crowns--an in vitro study.
    Reddy R; Basappa N; Reddy VV
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 1998 Mar; 16(1):9-11. PubMed ID: 11813717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Retention of gold alloy crowns cemented with traditional and resin cements.
    Pinzón LM; Frey GN; Winkler MM; Tate WH; Burgess JO; Powers JM
    Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(4):351-3. PubMed ID: 19639070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.