BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15947724)

  • 21. Measurement properties of the Australian Women's Activity Survey.
    Fjeldsoe BS; Marshall AL; Miller YD
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2009 May; 41(5):1020-33. PubMed ID: 19346985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Self-reported physical activity validated by pedometer: a pilot study.
    Speck BJ; Looney SW
    Public Health Nurs; 2006; 23(1):88-94. PubMed ID: 16460425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Differences in the quantitative and qualitative performance of a calcium-specific food frequency questionnaire across age and sex.
    Magkos F; Manios Y; Babaroutsi E; Sidossis LS
    J Hum Nutr Diet; 2006 Oct; 19(5):331-42. PubMed ID: 16961679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Can sedentary adults accurately recall the intensity of their physical activity?
    Duncan GE; Sydeman SJ; Perri MG; Limacher MC; Martin AD
    Prev Med; 2001 Jul; 33(1):18-26. PubMed ID: 11482992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Reliability and validity of the habitual activity estimation scale (HAES) in patients with cystic fibrosis.
    Wells GD; Wilkes DL; Schneiderman-Walker J; Elmi M; Tullis E; Lands LC; Ratjen F; Coates AL
    Pediatr Pulmonol; 2008 Apr; 43(4):345-53. PubMed ID: 18306334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Physical activity compliance: differences between overweight/obese and normal-weight adults.
    Davis JN; Hodges VA; Gillham MB
    Obesity (Silver Spring); 2006 Dec; 14(12):2259-65. PubMed ID: 17189554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Objectively measured light-intensity physical activity is independently associated with 2-h plasma glucose.
    Healy GN; Dunstan DW; Salmon J; Cerin E; Shaw JE; Zimmet PZ; Owen N
    Diabetes Care; 2007 Jun; 30(6):1384-9. PubMed ID: 17473059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Validation of the NPAQ-short - a brief questionnaire to monitor physical activity and compliance with the WHO recommendations.
    Danquah IH; Petersen CB; Skov SS; Tolstrup JS
    BMC Public Health; 2018 May; 18(1):601. PubMed ID: 29739383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Actigraph accelerometer interinstrument reliability during free-living in adults.
    McClain JJ; Sisson SB; Tudor-Locke C
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2007 Sep; 39(9):1509-14. PubMed ID: 17805082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Measuring activity in children and adolescents using self-report: PAQ-C and PAQ-A.
    Janz KF; Lutuchy EM; Wenthe P; Levy SM
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2008 Apr; 40(4):767-72. PubMed ID: 18317366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Longitudinal study of physical activity and inactivity in preschoolers: the FLAME study.
    Taylor RW; Murdoch L; Carter P; Gerrard DF; Williams SM; Taylor BJ
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2009 Jan; 41(1):96-102. PubMed ID: 19092702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The Physical Activity and Disability Survey -- Revised (PADS-R): an evaluation of a measure of physical activity in people with chronic neurological conditions.
    Kayes NM; Schluter PJ; McPherson KM; Taylor D; Kolt GS
    Clin Rehabil; 2009 Jun; 23(6):534-43. PubMed ID: 19447843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Population trends in leisure-time physical activity: Minnesota Heart Survey, 1980-2000.
    Steffen LM; Arnett DK; Blackburn H; Shah G; Armstrong C; Luepker RV; Jacobs DR
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2006 Oct; 38(10):1716-23. PubMed ID: 17019292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The repeatability of self reported physical activity patterns in rural South India.
    Vaz M; Bharathi AV; Thomas T; Yusuf S; Kurpad AV
    Asia Pac J Clin Nutr; 2009; 18(1):71-5. PubMed ID: 19329398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Validation of a computerized 24-hour physical activity recall (24PAR) instrument with pattern-recognition activity monitors.
    Calabro MA; Welk GJ; Carriquiry AL; Nusser SM; Beyler NK; Mathews CE
    J Phys Act Health; 2009 Mar; 6(2):211-20. PubMed ID: 19420399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of the computerized ACTIVITYGRAM instrument and the previous day physical activity recall for assessing physical activity in children.
    Welk GJ; Dzewaltowski DA; Hill JL
    Res Q Exerc Sport; 2004 Dec; 75(4):370-80. PubMed ID: 15673036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The accuracy of the 24-h activity recall method for assessing sedentary behaviour: the physical activity measurement survey (PAMS) project.
    Kim Y; Welk GJ
    J Sports Sci; 2017 Feb; 35(3):255-261. PubMed ID: 27019092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of two approaches to structured physical activity surveys for adolescents.
    McMurray RG; Ring KB; Treuth MS; Welk GJ; Pate RR; Schmitz KH; Pickrel JL; Gonzalez V; Almedia MJ; Young DR; Sallis JF
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2004 Dec; 36(12):2135-43. PubMed ID: 15570151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Retest reliability of recall measures of leisure-time physical activity in Australian adults.
    Booth ML; Owen N; Bauman AE; Gore CJ
    Int J Epidemiol; 1996 Feb; 25(1):153-9. PubMed ID: 8666485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Reliability of long-term recall of participation in physical activity by middle-aged men and women.
    Blair SN; Dowda M; Pate RR; Kronenfeld J; Howe HG; Parker G; Blair A; Fridinger F
    Am J Epidemiol; 1991 Feb; 133(3):266-75. PubMed ID: 2000844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.