These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15947799)

  • 1. Comparison of stereoscopic digital imaging and slide film photography in the identification of macular degeneration.
    Somani R; Tennant M; Rudnisky C; Weis E; Ting A; Eppler J; Greve M; Hinz B; de Leon A
    Can J Ophthalmol; 2005 Jun; 40(3):293-302. PubMed ID: 15947799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Detection of age-related macular degeneration using a nonmydriatic digital camera and a standard film fundus camera.
    Klein R; Meuer SM; Moss SE; Klein BE; Neider MW; Reinke J
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2004 Nov; 122(11):1642-6. PubMed ID: 15534124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Web-based grading of compressed stereoscopic digital photography versus standard slide film photography for the diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy.
    Rudnisky CJ; Tennant MT; Weis E; Ting A; Hinz BJ; Greve MD
    Ophthalmology; 2007 Sep; 114(9):1748-54. PubMed ID: 17368543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of nonmydriatic digitized video fundus images with standard 35-mm slides to screen for and identify specific lesions of age-related macular degeneration.
    Lim JI; Labree L; Nichols T; Cardenas I
    Retina; 2002 Feb; 22(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 11884880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Identification of diabetic retinopathy by stereoscopic digital imaging via teleophthalmology: a comparison to slide film.
    Tennant MT; Greve MD; Rudnisky CJ; Hillson TR; Hinz BJ
    Can J Ophthalmol; 2001 Jun; 36(4):187-96. PubMed ID: 11428527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Teleretinal imaging for detection of referable macular degeneration.
    Duchin KS; Asefzadeh B; Poulaki V; Rett D; Marescalchi P; Cavallerano A
    Optom Vis Sci; 2015 Jun; 92(6):714-8. PubMed ID: 25955641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of nonmydriatic digital retinal imaging versus dilated ophthalmic examination for nondiabetic eye disease in persons with diabetes.
    Chow SP; Aiello LM; Cavallerano JD; Katalinic P; Hock K; Tolson A; Kirby R; Bursell SE; Aiello LP
    Ophthalmology; 2006 May; 113(5):833-40. PubMed ID: 16650680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effectiveness and safety of screening for diabetic retinopathy with two nonmydriatic digital images compared with the seven standard stereoscopic photographic fields.
    Boucher MC; Gresset JA; Angioi K; Olivier S
    Can J Ophthalmol; 2003 Dec; 38(7):557-68. PubMed ID: 14740797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Nonmydriatic ultrawide field retinal imaging compared with dilated standard 7-field 35-mm photography and retinal specialist examination for evaluation of diabetic retinopathy.
    Silva PS; Cavallerano JD; Sun JK; Noble J; Aiello LM; Aiello LP
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2012 Sep; 154(3):549-559.e2. PubMed ID: 22626617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prospective evaluation of digital non-stereo color fundus photography as a screening tool in age-related macular degeneration.
    Pirbhai A; Sheidow T; Hooper P
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2005 Mar; 139(3):455-61. PubMed ID: 15767053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. JPEG compression of stereoscopic digital images for the diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy via teleophthalmology.
    Baker CF; Rudnisky CJ; Tennant MT; Sanghera P; Hinz BJ; De Leon AR; Greve MD
    Can J Ophthalmol; 2004 Dec; 39(7):746-54. PubMed ID: 15696764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Brightness, contrast, and color balance of digital versus film retinal images in the age-related eye disease study 2.
    Hubbard LD; Danis RP; Neider MW; Thayer DW; Wabers HD; White JK; Pugliese AJ; Pugliese MF;
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2008 Aug; 49(8):3269-82. PubMed ID: 18421079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Methods and reproducibility of grading optimized digital color fundus photographs in the Age-Related Eye Disease Study 2 (AREDS2 Report Number 2).
    Danis RP; Domalpally A; Chew EY; Clemons TE; Armstrong J; SanGiovanni JP; Ferris FL;
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2013 Jul; 54(7):4548-54. PubMed ID: 23620429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. What is lost by digitizing stereoscopic fundus color slides for macular grading in age-related maculopathy and degeneration?
    Scholl HP; Dandekar SS; Peto T; Bunce C; Xing W; Jenkins S; Bird AC
    Ophthalmology; 2004 Jan; 111(1):125-32. PubMed ID: 14711724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Stereo nonmydriatic digital-video color retinal imaging compared with Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study seven standard field 35-mm stereo color photos for determining level of diabetic retinopathy.
    Bursell SE; Cavallerano JD; Cavallerano AA; Clermont AC; Birkmire-Peters D; Aiello LP; Aiello LM;
    Ophthalmology; 2001 Mar; 108(3):572-85. PubMed ID: 11237913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Compressed 3D and 2D digital images versus standard 3D slide film for the evaluation of glaucomatous optic nerve features.
    Sandhu S; Rudnisky C; Arora S; Kassam F; Douglas G; Edwards MC; Verstraten K; Wong B; Damji KF
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2018 Mar; 102(3):364-368. PubMed ID: 28835424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of two, three and four 45 degrees image fields obtained with the Topcon CRW6 nonmydriatic camera for screening for diabetic retinopathy.
    Perrier M; Boucher MC; Angioi K; Gresset JA; Olivier S
    Can J Ophthalmol; 2003 Dec; 38(7):569-74. PubMed ID: 14740798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Age-Related Eye Disease Study severity scale for age-related macular degeneration: AREDS Report No. 17.
    Davis MD; Gangnon RE; Lee LY; Hubbard LD; Klein BE; Klein R; Ferris FL; Bressler SB; Milton RC;
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2005 Nov; 123(11):1484-98. PubMed ID: 16286610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of digital nonmydriatic fundus imaging with standard 35-millimeter slides for diabetic retinopathy.
    Lim JI; LaBree L; Nichols T; Cardenas I
    Ophthalmology; 2000 May; 107(5):866-70. PubMed ID: 10811076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Screening for diabetic retinopathy by one-field, non-mydriatic, 45 degrees digital photography is inadequate.
    Kuo HK; Hsieh HH; Liu RT
    Ophthalmologica; 2005; 219(5):292-6. PubMed ID: 16123556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.