These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15947876)
1. Are risk factors for breast cancer associated with follow-up procedures in diverse women with abnormal mammography? Juarbe TC; Kaplan CP; Somkin CP; Pasick R; Gildengorin G; Pérez-Stable EJ Cancer Causes Control; 2005 Apr; 16(3):245-53. PubMed ID: 15947876 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Depressive symptoms among women with an abnormal mammogram. Alderete E; Juarbe TC; Kaplan CP; Pasick R; Pérez-Stable EJ Psychooncology; 2006 Jan; 15(1):66-78. PubMed ID: 15816053 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Risk factors for breast cancer in women undergoing mammography. Reuter KL; Baker SP; Krolikowski FJ AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Feb; 158(2):273-8. PubMed ID: 1729780 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Screening mammography for women aged 40 to 49 years at average risk for breast cancer: an evidence-based analysis. Medical Advisory Secretariat Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2007; 7(1):1-32. PubMed ID: 23074501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of abnormal mammography results and palpable breast abnormalities. Kerlikowske K; Smith-Bindman R; Ljung BM; Grady D Ann Intern Med; 2003 Aug; 139(4):274-84. PubMed ID: 12965983 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Delays in Follow-up Care for Abnormal Mammograms in Mobile Mammography Versus Fixed-Clinic Patients. Vang SS; Dunn A; Margolies LR; Jandorf L J Gen Intern Med; 2022 May; 37(7):1619-1625. PubMed ID: 35212876 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Multilevel Factors Associated With Time to Biopsy After Abnormal Screening Mammography Results by Race and Ethnicity. Lawson MB; Bissell MCS; Miglioretti DL; Eavey J; Chapman CH; Mandelblatt JS; Onega T; Henderson LM; Rauscher GH; Kerlikowske K; Sprague BL; Bowles EJA; Gard CC; Parsian S; Lee CI JAMA Oncol; 2022 Aug; 8(8):1115-1126. PubMed ID: 35737381 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Are there racial/ethnic disparities among women younger than 40 undergoing mammography? Kapp JM; Walker R; Haneuse S; Buist DS; Yankaskas BC Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2010 Nov; 124(1):213-22. PubMed ID: 20204501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Factors influencing time to diagnosis after abnormal mammography in diverse women. Pérez-Stable EJ; Afable-Munsuz A; Kaplan CP; Pace L; Samayoa C; Somkin C; Nickleach D; Lee M; Márquez-Magaña L; Juarbe T; Pasick RJ J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2013 Feb; 22(2):159-66. PubMed ID: 23350859 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Factors associated with the incompliance with mammogram screening among individuals with a family history of breast cancer or ovarian cancer. Wu H; Zhu K; Jatoi I; Shah M; Shriver CD; Potter J Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Mar; 101(3):317-24. PubMed ID: 16821080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A prospective study of perceived susceptibility to breast cancer and nonadherence to mammography screening guidelines in African American and White women ages 40 to 79 years. Calvocoressi L; Kasl SV; Lee CH; Stolar M; Claus EB; Jones BA Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2004 Dec; 13(12):2096-105. PubMed ID: 15598767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The relation between projected breast cancer risk, perceived cancer risk, and mammography use. Results from the National Health Interview Survey. Gross CP; Filardo G; Singh HS; Freedman AN; Farrell MH J Gen Intern Med; 2006 Feb; 21(2):158-64. PubMed ID: 16390511 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Responding to the challenges of breast cancer in egypt and other arab countries. El Saghir NS J Egypt Natl Canc Inst; 2008 Dec; 20(4):309-12. PubMed ID: 20571588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mammography use among women aged 18-39 years in the United States. Qin J; White MC; Sabatino SA; Febo-Vázquez I Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2018 Apr; 168(3):687-693. PubMed ID: 29264752 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. What factors are associated with diagnostic follow-up after abnormal mammograms? Findings from a U.S. National Survey. Yabroff KR; Breen N; Vernon SW; Meissner HI; Freedman AN; Ballard-Barbash R Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2004 May; 13(5):723-32. PubMed ID: 15159302 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Delay in diagnostic testing after abnormal mammography in low-income women. Wujcik D; Shyr Y; Li M; Clayton MF; Ellington L; Menon U; Mooney K Oncol Nurs Forum; 2009 Nov; 36(6):709-15. PubMed ID: 19887359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Racial/ethnic disparities in time to follow-up after an abnormal mammogram. Press R; Carrasquillo O; Sciacca RR; Giardina EG J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2008; 17(6):923-30. PubMed ID: 18554094 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Understanding the patient-provider communication needs and experiences of Latina and non-Latina White women following an abnormal mammogram. Molina Y; Hohl SD; Ko LK; Rodriguez EA; Thompson B; Beresford SA J Cancer Educ; 2014 Dec; 29(4):781-9. PubMed ID: 24748097 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Inadequate follow-up of abnormal screening mammograms: findings from the race differences in screening mammography process study (United States). Jones BA; Dailey A; Calvocoressi L; Reams K; Kasl SV; Lee C; Hsu H Cancer Causes Control; 2005 Sep; 16(7):809-21. PubMed ID: 16132791 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of risk factors for ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive breast cancer. Kerlikowske K; Barclay J; Grady D; Sickles EA; Ernster V J Natl Cancer Inst; 1997 Jan; 89(1):76-82. PubMed ID: 8978410 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]