These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15948288)

  • 1. The power of a story: new, automatic associations from a single reading of a short scenario.
    Foroni F; Mayr U
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2005 Feb; 12(1):139-44. PubMed ID: 15948288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Minimizing the influence of recoding in the Implicit Association Test: the Recoding-Free Implicit Association Test (IAT-RF).
    Rothermund K; Teige-Mocigemba S; Gast A; Wentura D
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Jan; 62(1):84-98. PubMed ID: 18609400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Is the implicit association test immune to faking?
    Steffens MC
    Exp Psychol; 2004; 51(3):165-79. PubMed ID: 15267125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Items' cross-category associations as a confounding factor in the Implicit Association Test.
    Steffens MC; Plewe I
    Z Exp Psychol; 2001; 48(2):123-34. PubMed ID: 11392980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Compelled to consume: the Implicit Association Test and automatic alcohol motivation.
    Ostafin BD; Palfai TP
    Psychol Addict Behav; 2006 Sep; 20(3):322-7. PubMed ID: 16938070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reducing the influence of extrapersonal associations on the Implicit Association Test: personalizing the IAT.
    Olson MA; Fazio RH
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2004 May; 86(5):653-67. PubMed ID: 15161392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Implicit attitudes in sexuality: gender differences.
    Geer JH; Robertson GG
    Arch Sex Behav; 2005 Dec; 34(6):671-7. PubMed ID: 16362251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Linking automatic evaluation to mood and information processing style: consequences for experienced affect, impression formation, and stereotyping.
    Chartrand TL; van Baaren RB; Bargh JA
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2006 Feb; 135(1):70-7. PubMed ID: 16478316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Implicit association measurement with the IAT: evidence for effects of executive control processes.
    Mierke J; Klauer KC
    Z Exp Psychol; 2001; 48(2):107-22. PubMed ID: 11392979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Testing the semantic differential as a model of task processes with the implicit association test.
    Xiong MJ; Logan GD; Franks JJ
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Oct; 34(7):1452-63. PubMed ID: 17263070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Two bases of the compatibility effect in the Implicit Association Test (IAT).
    Kinoshita S; Peek-O'Leary M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Dec; 59(12):2102-20. PubMed ID: 17095490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Figure-ground asymmetries in the Implicit Association Test (IAT).
    Rothermund K; Wentura D
    Z Exp Psychol; 2001; 48(2):94-106. PubMed ID: 11392986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Does substance use affect reliabilities of the Implicit Association Test?
    Aberson CL; Beeney J
    J Soc Psychol; 2007 Feb; 147(1):27-40. PubMed ID: 17345920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The role of self-involvement in shifting IAT effects.
    Marini M; Rubichi S; Sartori G
    Exp Psychol; 2012; 59(6):348-54. PubMed ID: 22750742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Attitude measurement using the Implicit Association Test (IAT).
    Plessner H; Banse R
    Z Exp Psychol; 2001; 48(2):82-4. PubMed ID: 11392984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Basic processes in reading: is visual word recognition obligatory?
    Risko EF; Stolz JA; Besner D
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2005 Feb; 12(1):119-24. PubMed ID: 15945205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Using the implicit association test to measure self-esteem and self-concept.
    Greenwald AG; Farnham SD
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2000 Dec; 79(6):1022-38. PubMed ID: 11138752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Memory-based processing as a mechanism of automaticity in text comprehension.
    Rawson KA; Middleton EL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Mar; 35(2):353-70. PubMed ID: 19271851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evidence of a highly specific relationship between rapid automatic naming of digits and text-reading speed.
    Savage R; Frederickson N
    Brain Lang; 2005 May; 93(2):152-9. PubMed ID: 15781303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessing text representations with recognition: The interaction of domain knowledge and text coherence.
    Long DL; Wilson J; Hurley R; Prat CS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jul; 32(4):816-27. PubMed ID: 16822149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.