These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15948326)

  • 1. Determining the level of statistician participation on Canadian-based research ethics boards.
    Thabane L; Childs A; Lafontaine A
    IRB; 2005; 27(2):11-4. PubMed ID: 15948326
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Protecting and promoting the human research subject: a review of the function of research ethics boards in Canadian faculties of medicine.
    National Council on Bioethics in Human Research (Canada). Working Group on Evaluation
    NCBHR Commun; 1995; 6(1):3-32. PubMed ID: 11654937
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Financial conflicts of interest and protection of human research subjects.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2004 Jun; 19(6):1-2. PubMed ID: 15462034
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Canadian research ethics boards and multisite research: experiences from two minimal-risk studies.
    Racine E; Bell E; Deslauriers C
    IRB; 2010; 32(3):12-8. PubMed ID: 20590052
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The role of institutional review boards in protecting human subjects: are we really ready to fix a broken system?
    Beh HG
    Law Psychol Rev; 2002; 26(1):1-47. PubMed ID: 16514756
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Research ethics boards--operational issues I.
    Lynch A
    NCEHR Commun; 1999; 9(2):9-14. PubMed ID: 15540381
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ethics committees in the United States.
    Capron AM
    Not Polit; 2002; 18(67):87-94. PubMed ID: 15282924
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The task for ethics review: should research ethics boards address an approach or a paradigm?
    Nelson CH; McPherson DH
    NCEHR Commun; 2004; 12(2):11-22. PubMed ID: 15460563
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Medical research oversight from the corporate governance perspective: comparing institutional review boards and corporate boards.
    Saver RS
    William Mary Law Rev; 2004 Nov; 46(2):619-730. PubMed ID: 17167924
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Human subjects protections, institutional review boards, and cultural anthropological research.
    Marshall PA
    Anthropol Q; 2003; 76(2):269-85. PubMed ID: 15112645
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Research involving children: regulations, review boards and reform.
    Gandhi R
    J Health Care Law Policy; 2005; 8(2):264-330. PubMed ID: 16471026
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Canadian governance of health research involving human subjects: is anybody minding the store?
    McDonald M
    Health Law J; 2001; 9():1-21. PubMed ID: 12141216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Research ethics boards: the protection of human subjects.
    Lestou VS; Ondrusek N; Blajchman MA
    PLoS Med; 2006 Oct; 3(10):e472; author reply e471. PubMed ID: 17076582
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Community vs. enclave: the moral voice of community can be reflected in IRB composition.
    Taylor C
    Prot Hum Subj; 2002; (7):6. PubMed ID: 12737181
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The conduct of Canadian researchers and institutional review boards regarding substituted consent for research.
    Bravo G; Dubois MF; Paquet M
    IRB; 2004; 26(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 15281211
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ethics in a scientific approach: the importance of the biostatistician in research ethics committees.
    Atici E; Erdemir AD
    J Med Ethics; 2008 Apr; 34(4):297-300. PubMed ID: 18375684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An evaluation of human subjects protection at CDC/ATSDR.
    Santelli J; Ginn E; Speers MA
    IRB; 2000; 22(4):1-7. PubMed ID: 11883474
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Research ethics boards--operational issues II.
    Maire A
    NCEHR Commun; 1999; 9(2):14-6. PubMed ID: 15540382
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Common (mis)perceptions about IRB review of human subjects research.
    Lynn MR; Nelson DK
    Nurs Sci Q; 2005 Jul; 18(3):264-70. PubMed ID: 15976051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Minimal risk and its implications. Proceedings of the NCEHR National Workshop on Minimal Risk, March 31-April 1, 2000 held in Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
    Anderson JA; Weijer C
    NCEHR Commun; 2001 Sep; 11(1):15-26. PubMed ID: 15540386
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.