These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15948326)

  • 41. Just-in-time IRB review: capitalizing on scientific merit review to improve human subjects research compliance.
    Kelly PA; Johnson ML
    IRB; 2005; 27(2):6-10. PubMed ID: 15948325
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. A relational ethical dialogue with research ethics committees.
    Larkin PJ; de Casterlé BD; Schotsmans P
    Nurs Ethics; 2008 Mar; 15(2):234-42. PubMed ID: 18272613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Navajo nation IRB: a unique human research review board has three primary concerns: protecting its community, its people, and its heritage.
    Prot Hum Subj; 2003; (8):1-2. PubMed ID: 16178108
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Continuing ethics review practices by Canadian research ethics boards.
    Norton K; Wilson DM
    IRB; 2008; 30(3):10-4. PubMed ID: 18814440
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Noninstitutional commercial review boards in North America: a critical appraisal and comparison with IRBs.
    Lemmens T; Thompson A
    IRB; 2001; 23(2):1-12. PubMed ID: 12825562
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The noninstitutional review board: what distinguishes us from them?
    Heath E
    IRB; 1998; 20(5):8-11. PubMed ID: 11657585
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Translating ethics into law: duties of care in health research involving humans.
    Zimmerman SV
    Health Law Rev; 2005; 13(2-3):13-8. PubMed ID: 16459410
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Model federal policy on protection of human subjects is now final.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 1991 Aug; 6(8):1-3. PubMed ID: 16145785
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Regional perspectives in research ethics: a report from Bangladesh.
    Harun-Ar-Rashid
    East Mediterr Health J; 2006; 12 Suppl 1():S66-72. PubMed ID: 17037691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Research intermediaries: position created to protect vulnerable people who might not have capacity to consent.
    Allen J
    Prot Hum Subj; 2001; ():4-5, 9. PubMed ID: 11936147
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The data monitoring committee: how it operates and why.
    Friedman L; DeMets D
    IRB; 1981 Apr; 3(4):6-8. PubMed ID: 11661946
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The purpose, composition, and function of an institutional review board: balancing priorities.
    Enfield KB; Truwit JD
    Respir Care; 2008 Oct; 53(10):1330-6. PubMed ID: 18811996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Maximizing the effectiveness of REBs.
    Fuks A; Beauvais C
    NCEHR Commun; 2000; 10(2):9-15. PubMed ID: 15468467
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. SACHRP recommendations for review of children's research requiring DHHS secretary's approval.
    Fisher CB; Kornetsky SZ
    IRB; 2005; 27(3):8-10. PubMed ID: 16021795
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Committees for Ethics in Research involving human subjects.
    Hossne WS; Vieira S; De Freitas CB
    J Int Bioethique; 2008; 19(1-2):131-41, 200. PubMed ID: 18664006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Cooperation or co-optation?: Assessing the methodological benefits and barriers involved in conducting qualitative research through medical institutional settings.
    Parnis D; Du Mont J; Gombay B
    Qual Health Res; 2005 May; 15(5):686-97. PubMed ID: 15802543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Human research ethics in practice: deliberative strategies, processes and perceptions.
    Gillam L; Guillemin M; Bolitho A; Rosenthal D
    Monash Bioeth Rev; 2009 Mar; 28(1):7.1-17. PubMed ID: 19839277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Difficulties in negotiating research access.
    Ames JC; Thompson S; Thurston MN
    Bull Med Ethics; 2001 Mar; (166):15-7. PubMed ID: 11878334
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The long arm of administrative law: applying administrative law principles to research ethics boards.
    Hadskis M; Carver P
    Health Law Rev; 2005; 13(2-3):19-32. PubMed ID: 16459411
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Local research ethics committees of the Mexican Institute of Social Security: results of a national survey.
    Valdez-Martinez E; Garduño-Espinosa J; Martinez-Salgado H; Porter JD
    Public Health; 2004 Jul; 118(5):329-36. PubMed ID: 15178139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.