These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15948507)

  • 21. Influence of matrix systems on proximal contact tightness of 2- and 3-surface posterior composite restorations in vivo.
    Wirsching E; Loomans BA; Klaiber B; Dörfer CE
    J Dent; 2011 May; 39(5):386-90. PubMed ID: 21414384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Class I occlusal composite resin restorations: in vivo post-operative sensitivity, wall adaptation, and microleakage.
    Opdam NJ; Feilzer AJ; Roeters JJ; Smale I
    Am J Dent; 1998 Oct; 11(5):229-34. PubMed ID: 10388382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A direct approach to restore anterior teeth.
    Denehy GE
    Am J Dent; 2000 Nov; 13(Spec No):55D-59D. PubMed ID: 11763919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Clinical challenges and the relevance of materials testing for posterior composite restorations.
    Sarrett DC
    Dent Mater; 2005 Jan; 21(1):9-20. PubMed ID: 15680997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Class II direct composite resin restorations with beta-quartz glass-ceramic inserts.
    Rada RE
    Quintessence Int; 1993 Nov; 24(11):793-8. PubMed ID: 20830892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Can modern restorative procedures and materials reliably seal cavities? In vitro investigations. Part 1.
    Hilton TJ
    Am J Dent; 2002 Jun; 15(3):198-210. PubMed ID: 12469759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Microleakage and polymerization shrinkage of various polymer restorative materials.
    Gerdolle DA; Mortier E; Droz D
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2008; 75(2):125-33. PubMed ID: 18647507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparative study of composite resin placement: centripetal buildup versus incremental technique.
    Szep S; Frank H; Kenzel B; Gerhardt T; Heidemann D
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2001 Apr; 13(3):243-50; quiz 252. PubMed ID: 11360771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A comparison of the marginal and internal adaptation of amalgam and resin composite restorations in small to moderate-sized Class II preparations of conventional design.
    Duncalf WV; Wilson NH
    Quintessence Int; 2000 May; 31(5):347-52. PubMed ID: 11203946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Controversies in posterior composite resin restorations.
    Wilson EG; Mandradjieff M; Brindock T
    Dent Clin North Am; 1990 Jan; 34(1):27-44. PubMed ID: 2403943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A review of polymerization shrinkage stress: current techniques for posterior direct resin restorations.
    Giachetti L; Scaminaci Russo D; Bambi C; Grandini R
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 Sep; 7(4):79-88. PubMed ID: 16957794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The effect of adhesive and flowable composite on postoperative sensitivity: 2-week results.
    Perdigão J; Anauate-Netto C; Carmo AR; Hodges JS; Cordeiro HJ; Lewgoy HR; Dutra-Corrêa M; Castilhos N; Amore R
    Quintessence Int; 2004; 35(10):777-84. PubMed ID: 15553285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Influence of different softstart polymerization techniques on marginal adaptation of Class V restorations.
    Muangmingsuk A; Senawongse P; Yudhasaraprasithi S
    Am J Dent; 2003 Apr; 16(2):117-9. PubMed ID: 12797570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Finishing and polishing criteria for minimally invasive composite restorations.
    LeSage B
    Gen Dent; 2011; 59(6):422-8; quiz 429-30. PubMed ID: 22313913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Cavity preparation factors and microleakage of Class II composite restorations filled at intraoral temperatures.
    Hilton TJ; Ferracane JL
    Am J Dent; 1999 Jun; 12(3):123-30. PubMed ID: 10649934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Achieving form and function for Class II restorations using aesthetic resin stratification.
    Shannon AT
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2006 Jun; 18(5):323-8. PubMed ID: 16903545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The use of liners under amalgam restorations: an in vitro study on marginal leakage.
    Marchiori S; Baratieri LN; de Andrada MA; Monteiro Júnior S; Ritter AV
    Quintessence Int; 1998 Oct; 29(10):637-42. PubMed ID: 9922761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The importance of proximal curing in posterior composite resin restorations.
    Lutz F; Krejci I; Barbakow F
    Quintessence Int; 1992 Sep; 23(9):605-7. PubMed ID: 1287711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Sealing ability of occlusal resin composite restoration using four restorative procedures.
    Banomyong D; Palamara JE; Messer HH; Burrow MF
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2008 Dec; 116(6):571-8. PubMed ID: 19049529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Microleakage of adhesive restorative materials.
    Gladys S; Van Meerbeek B; Lambrechts P; Vanherle G
    Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):170-6. PubMed ID: 11572296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.