These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
358 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15948681)
1. Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of periodontal applications of a living tissue-engineered human fibroblast-derived dermal substitute. II. Comparison to the subepithelial connective tissue graft: a randomized controlled feasibility study. Wilson TG; McGuire MK; Nunn ME J Periodontol; 2005 Jun; 76(6):881-9. PubMed ID: 15948681 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of periodontal applications of a living tissue-engineered human fibroblast-derived dermal substitute. I. Comparison to the gingival autograft: a randomized controlled pilot study. McGuire MK; Nunn ME J Periodontol; 2005 Jun; 76(6):867-80. PubMed ID: 15948680 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of human recession defects treated with coronally advanced flaps and either enamel matrix derivative or connective tissue. Part 1: Comparison of clinical parameters. McGuire MK; Nunn M J Periodontol; 2003 Aug; 74(8):1110-25. PubMed ID: 14514224 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Acellular dermal matrix seeded with autologous gingival fibroblasts for the treatment of gingival recession: a proof-of-concept study. Jhaveri HM; Chavan MS; Tomar GB; Deshmukh VL; Wani MR; Miller PD J Periodontol; 2010 Apr; 81(4):616-25. PubMed ID: 20367104 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. EMD or subepithelial connective tissue graft for the treatment of single gingival recessions: a pilot study. Alkan EA; Parlar A J Periodontal Res; 2011 Dec; 46(6):637-42. PubMed ID: 21631510 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative clinical study of guided tissue regeneration with a bioabsorbable bilayer collagen membrane and subepithelial connective tissue graft. Romagna-Genon C J Periodontol; 2001 Sep; 72(9):1258-64. PubMed ID: 11577960 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative 6-month clinical study of a subepithelial connective tissue graft and acellular dermal matrix graft for the treatment of gingival recession. Novaes AB; Grisi DC; Molina GO; Souza SL; Taba M; Grisi MF J Periodontol; 2001 Nov; 72(11):1477-84. PubMed ID: 11759858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative clinical study of a subepithelial connective tissue graft and acellular dermal matrix graft for the treatment of gingival recessions: six- to 12-month changes. de Souza SL; Novaes AB; Grisi DC; Taba M; Grisi MF; de Andrade PF J Int Acad Periodontol; 2008 Jul; 10(3):87-94. PubMed ID: 18714934 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of human recession defects treated with coronally advanced flaps and either enamel matrix derivative or connective tissue: comparison of clinical parameters at 10 years. McGuire MK; Scheyer ET; Nunn M J Periodontol; 2012 Nov; 83(11):1353-62. PubMed ID: 22348698 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative clinical study of a bioabsorbable membrane and subepithelial connective tissue graft in the treatment of human gingival recession. Borghetti A; Glise JM; Monnet-Corti V; Dejou J J Periodontol; 1999 Feb; 70(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 10102549 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Subpedicle acellular dermal matrix graft and autogenous connective tissue graft in the treatment of gingival recessions: a comparative 1-year clinical study. Paolantonio M; Dolci M; Esposito P; D'Archivio D; Lisanti L; Di Luccio A; Perinetti G J Periodontol; 2002 Nov; 73(11):1299-307. PubMed ID: 12479634 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Changes in gingival dimensions following connective tissue grafts for root coverage: comparison of two procedures. Han JS; John V; Blanchard SB; Kowolik MJ; Eckert GJ J Periodontol; 2008 Aug; 79(8):1346-54. PubMed ID: 18672983 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A multicenter comparative study of two root coverage procedures: coronally advanced flap with addition of enamel matrix proteins and subpedicle connective tissue graft. Nemcovsky CE; Artzi Z; Tal H; Kozlovsky A; Moses O J Periodontol; 2004 Apr; 75(4):600-7. PubMed ID: 15152826 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Subepithelial connective tissue graft in the treatment of multiple gingival recession. Dembowska E; Drozdzik A Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 Sep; 104(3):e1-7. PubMed ID: 17618142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Root coverage of advanced gingival recession: a comparative study between acellular dermal matrix allograft and subepithelial connective tissue grafts. Tal H; Moses O; Zohar R; Meir H; Nemcovsky C J Periodontol; 2002 Dec; 73(12):1405-11. PubMed ID: 12546089 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Controlled clinical evaluation of the subpedicle connective tissue graft for the coverage of gingival recession. Borghetti A; Louise F J Periodontol; 1994 Dec; 65(12):1107-12. PubMed ID: 7877082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Coronally positioned flap procedures with or without a bioabsorbable membrane in the treatment of human gingival recession. Amarante ES; Leknes KN; Skavland J; Lie T J Periodontol; 2000 Jun; 71(6):989-98. PubMed ID: 10914803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative clinical evaluation of acellular dermal matrix allograft and connective tissue graft for the treatment of gingival recession. Rahmani ME; Lades MA J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 May; 7(2):63-70. PubMed ID: 16685296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A 2-year follow-up of root coverage using sub-pedicle acellular dermal matrix allografts and subepithelial connective tissue autografts. Hirsch A; Goldstein M; Goultschin J; Boyan BD; Schwartz Z J Periodontol; 2005 Aug; 76(8):1323-8. PubMed ID: 16101365 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]