242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15949488)
1. Reliability of classification systems for intertrochanteric fractures of the proximal femur in experienced orthopaedic surgeons.
Jin WJ; Dai LY; Cui YM; Zhou Q; Jiang LS; Lu H
Injury; 2005 Jul; 36(7):858-61. PubMed ID: 15949488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reliability of the classification of proximal femur fractures: Does clinical experience matter?
Crijns TJ; Janssen SJ; Davis JT; Ring D; Sanchez HB;
Injury; 2018 Apr; 49(4):819-823. PubMed ID: 29549969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Classifying intertrochanteric fractures of the proximal femur: does experience matter?
Fung W; Jonsson A; Buhren V; Bhandari M
Med Princ Pract; 2007; 16(3):198-202. PubMed ID: 17409754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Classification of trochanteric fracture of the proximal femur: a study of the reliability of current systems.
Pervez H; Parker MJ; Pryor GA; Lutchman L; Chirodian N
Injury; 2002 Oct; 33(8):713-5. PubMed ID: 12213423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Classification of femur trochanteric fracture: Evaluating the reliability of Tang classification.
Yin B; He Y; Wang D; Zhou J
Injury; 2021 Jun; 52(6):1500-1505. PubMed ID: 33280893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reliability and reproducibility of the new AO/OTA 2018 classification system for proximal humeral fractures: a comparison of three different classification systems.
Marongiu G; Leinardi L; Congia S; Frigau L; Mola F; Capone A
J Orthop Traumatol; 2020 Mar; 21(1):4. PubMed ID: 32166457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The intra- and interobserver reliability of five commonly used intertrochanteric femur fracture classification systems.
Yıldırım C; Muratoğlu OG; Turan K; Ergün T; Mısır A; Aydın M
Jt Dis Relat Surg; 2022; 33(1):187-192. PubMed ID: 35361094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reliability and Reproducibility of the OTA/AO Classification for Humeral Shaft Fractures.
Mahabier KC; Van Lieshout EM; Van Der Schaaf BC; Roukema GR; Punt BJ; Verhofstad MH; Den Hartog D
J Orthop Trauma; 2017 Mar; 31(3):e75-e80. PubMed ID: 27755334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of inter- and intra-observer reliability of current classification systems for subtrochanteric femoral fractures.
İmerci A; Aydogan NH; Tosun K
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2018 Apr; 28(3):499-502. PubMed ID: 29110093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of two classification systems for intra-articular calcaneal fractures.
Lauder AJ; Inda DJ; Bott AM; Clare MP; Fitzgibbons TC; Mormino MA
Foot Ankle Int; 2006 Apr; 27(4):251-5. PubMed ID: 16624214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The reliability of a Garden, AO and simple II stage classifications for intracapsular hip fractures.
Masionis P; Uvarovas V; Mazarevičius G; Popov K; Venckus Š; Baužys K; Porvaneckas N
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2019 Feb; 105(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 30639032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of the Inter and Intra-Observer Reliability of the AO Classification of Intertrochanteric Fractures and the Device Choice (DHS, PFNA, and DCS) of Fixations.
Zarie M; Mohamoud MF; Farhoud AR; Bagheri N; Khan FMY; Heshmatifar M; Klantar H
Ethiop J Health Sci; 2020 Sep; 30(5):755-760. PubMed ID: 33911837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reliability of the AO/ASIF classification for pertrochanteric femoral fractures.
Schipper IB; Steyerberg EW; Castelein RM; van Vugt AB
Acta Orthop Scand; 2001 Feb; 72(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 11327411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Interobserver reliability of classification and characterization of proximal humeral fractures: a comparison of two and three-dimensional CT.
Bruinsma WE; Guitton TG; Warner JJ; Ring D;
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Sep; 95(17):1600-4. PubMed ID: 24005201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the cooney classification of distal radius fractures between experienced orthopaedic surgeons.
Jin WJ; Jiang LS; Shen L; Lu H; Cui YM; Zhou Q; Dai LY
J Hand Surg Eur Vol; 2007 Oct; 32(5):509-11. PubMed ID: 17950210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Inter- and intra-observer reliability of the new AO/OTA classification of proximal femur fractures.
Chan G; Hughes K; Barakat A; Edres K; da Assuncao R; Page P; Dawe E
Injury; 2021 Jun; 52(6):1434-1437. PubMed ID: 33097201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Classification of intertrochanteric fractures with computed tomography: a study of intraobserver and interobserver variability and prognostic value.
Chapman CB; Herrera MF; Binenbaum G; Schweppe M; Staron RB; Feldman F; Rosenwasser MP
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2003 Sep; 32(9):443-9. PubMed ID: 14560826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Gunshot femoral shaft fractures: is the current classification system reliable?
Shepherd LE; Zalavras CG; Jaki K; Shean C; Patzakis MJ
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2003 Mar; (408):101-9. PubMed ID: 12616045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Impact of Three-Dimensional CT Imaging on Intraobserver and Interobserver Reliability of Proximal Humeral Fracture Classifications and Treatment Recommendations.
Berkes MB; Dines JS; Little MT; Garner MR; Shifflett GD; Lazaro LE; Wellman DS; Dines DM; Lorich DG
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2014 Aug; 96(15):1281-1286. PubMed ID: 25100775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Intra- and inter-rater reliability of a three-dimensional classification system for intertrochanteric fracture using computed tomography.
Wada K; Mikami H; Toki S; Amari R; Takai M; Sairyo K
Injury; 2020 Nov; 51(11):2682-2685. PubMed ID: 32718752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
