128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15949610)
1. Modelling of sequential groundwater treatment with zero valent iron and granular activated carbon.
Bayer P; Finkel M
J Contam Hydrol; 2005 Jun; 78(1-2):129-46. PubMed ID: 15949610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Competing TCE and cis-DCE degradation kinetics by zero-valent iron-experimental results and numerical simulation.
Schäfer D; Köber R; Dahmke A
J Contam Hydrol; 2003 Sep; 65(3-4):183-202. PubMed ID: 12935949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. ORC-GAC-Fe0 system for the remediation of trichloroethylene and monochlorobenzene contaminated aquifer: 1. Adsorption and degradation.
Lin Q; Chen YX; Plagentz V; Schäfer D; Dahmke A
J Environ Sci (China); 2004; 16(1):108-12. PubMed ID: 14971463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Batch-test study on the dechlorination of 1,1,1-trichloroethane in contaminated aquifer material by zero-valent iron.
Lookman R; Bastiaens L; Borremans B; Maesen M; Gemoets J; Diels L
J Contam Hydrol; 2004 Oct; 74(1-4):133-44. PubMed ID: 15358490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Synthesis of granular activated carbon/zero valent iron composites for simultaneous adsorption/dechlorination of trichloroethylene.
Tseng HH; Su JG; Liang C
J Hazard Mater; 2011 Aug; 192(2):500-6. PubMed ID: 21676545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Economical and ecological comparison of granular activated carbon (GAC) adsorber refill strategies.
Bayer P; Heuer E; Karl U; Finkel M
Water Res; 2005 May; 39(9):1719-28. PubMed ID: 15899270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Modelling of geochemical and isotopic changes in a column experiment for degradation of TCE by zero-valent iron.
Prommer H; Aziz LH; Bolaño N; Taubald H; Schüth C
J Contam Hydrol; 2008 Apr; 97(1-2):13-26. PubMed ID: 18267347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. In situ testing of metallic iron nanoparticle mobility and reactivity in a shallow granular aquifer.
Bennett P; He F; Zhao D; Aiken B; Feldman L
J Contam Hydrol; 2010 Jul; 116(1-4):35-46. PubMed ID: 20542350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Technico-economic assessment of groundwater treatment by palladium-on-zeolite-catalyst in comparison to GAC fixed bed adsorbers.
Bayer P; Schüth C
Water Sci Technol; 2010; 62(3):708-18. PubMed ID: 20706019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Modelling the long-term performance of zero-valent iron using a spatio-temporal approach for iron aging.
Kouznetsova I; Bayer P; Ebert M; Finkel M
J Contam Hydrol; 2007 Feb; 90(1-2):58-80. PubMed ID: 17113680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Adsorptive selenite removal from water using iron-coated GAC adsorbents.
Zhang N; Lin LS; Gang D
Water Res; 2008 Aug; 42(14):3809-16. PubMed ID: 18694584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Application of a three-component competitive adsorption model to evaluate and optimize granular activated carbon systems.
Schideman LC; Snoeyink VL; Mariñas BJ; Ding L; Campos C
Water Res; 2007 Aug; 41(15):3289-98. PubMed ID: 17572469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Nitrate and ammonium ions removal from groundwater by a hybrid system of zero-valent iron combined with adsorbents.
Ji MK; Park WB; Khan MA; Abou-Shanab RA; Kim Y; Cho Y; Choi J; Song H; Jeon BH
J Environ Monit; 2012 Apr; 14(4):1153-8. PubMed ID: 22344042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of adsorbent dose, its particle size and initial arsenic concentration on the removal of arsenic, iron and manganese from simulated ground water by Fe3+ impregnated activated carbon.
Mondal P; Majumder CB; Mohanty B
J Hazard Mater; 2008 Feb; 150(3):695-702. PubMed ID: 17574333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Removal of thiobencarb in aqueous solution by zero valent iron.
Nurul Amin M; Kaneco S; Kato T; Katsumata H; Suzuki T; Ohta K
Chemosphere; 2008 Jan; 70(3):511-5. PubMed ID: 17963816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Conceptual comparison of pink water treatment technologies: granular activated carbon, anaerobic fluidized bed, and zero-valent iron-Fenton process.
Oh SY; Cha DK; Chiu PC; Kim BJ
Water Sci Technol; 2004; 49(5-6):129-36. PubMed ID: 15137416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fenton-driven chemical regeneration of MTBE-spent GAC.
Huling SG; Jones PK; Ela WP; Arnold RG
Water Res; 2005 May; 39(10):2145-53. PubMed ID: 15885738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A laboratory study for the treatment of arsenic, iron, and manganese bearing ground water using Fe(3+) impregnated activated carbon: effects of shaking time, pH and temperature.
Mondal P; Balomajumder C; Mohanty B
J Hazard Mater; 2007 Jun; 144(1-2):420-6. PubMed ID: 17141955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reductive dechlorination of activated carbon-adsorbed trichloroethylene by zero-valent iron: carbon as electron shuttle.
Tang H; Zhu D; Li T; Kong H; Chen W
J Environ Qual; 2011; 40(6):1878-85. PubMed ID: 22031571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effect of silica on the degradation of organohalides in granular iron columns.
Kohn T; Roberts AL
J Contam Hydrol; 2006 Feb; 83(1-2):70-88. PubMed ID: 16364495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
