192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15950686)
1. Advantages and disadvantages of nonfusion technology in spine surgery.
Huang RC; Girardi FP; Lim MR; Cammisa FP
Orthop Clin North Am; 2005 Jul; 36(3):263-9. PubMed ID: 15950686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Motion preservation technologies: alternatives to spinal fusion.
Singh K; An HS
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2006 Sep; 35(9):411-6. PubMed ID: 17036776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Lumbar disc arthroplasty: a critical review.
Resnick DK; Watters WC
Clin Neurosurg; 2007; 54():83-7. PubMed ID: 18504901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prospective, randomized trial of metal-on-metal artificial lumbar disc replacement: initial results for treatment of discogenic pain.
Sasso RC; Foulk DM; Hahn M
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jan; 33(2):123-31. PubMed ID: 18197095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Replacement of lumbosacral intervertebral disks using artificial prostheses: surgical tactics and technique].
Konovalov NA; Shevelev IN; Kungurtsev VV; Zelenkov PV; Nazarenko AG
Zh Vopr Neirokhir Im N N Burdenko; 2008; (3):25-30; discussion 30-1. PubMed ID: 19062592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [The efficiency of spinal surgery].
Osterman H; Lund T; Osterman K; Kankare J
Duodecim; 2005; 121(8):903-10. PubMed ID: 15931837
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Acquired spondylolysis after implantation of a lumbar ProDisc II prosthesis: case report and review of the literature.
Schulte TL; Lerner T; Hackenberg L; Liljenqvist U; Bullmann V
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Oct; 32(22):E645-8. PubMed ID: 18090074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Long-segment fusion of the thoracolumbar spine in conjunction with a motion-preserving artificial disc replacement: case report and review of the literature.
Lehman RA; Lenke LG
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Apr; 32(7):E240-5. PubMed ID: 17414900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fusion versus disk replacement for degenerative conditions of the lumbar and cervical spine: quid est testimonium?
Kishen TJ; Diwan AD
Orthop Clin North Am; 2010 Apr; 41(2):167-81. PubMed ID: 20399356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dynamic stabilization of the spine: a new classification system.
Kaner T; Sasani M; Oktenoglu T; Ozer AF
Turk Neurosurg; 2010 Apr; 20(2):205-15. PubMed ID: 20401848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Relaxation of forces needed to distract cervical vertebrae after discectomy: a biomechanical study.
Aryan HE; Newman CB; Lu DC; Hu SS; Tay BK; Bradford DS; Puttlitz CM; Ames CP
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 Apr; 22(2):100-4. PubMed ID: 19342931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Motion analysis of bryan cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior discectomy and fusion: results from a prospective, randomized, multicenter, clinical trial.
Sasso RC; Best NM; Metcalf NH; Anderson PA
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Aug; 21(6):393-9. PubMed ID: 18679092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical results of charité lumbar total disc replacement.
Regan JJ
Orthop Clin North Am; 2005 Jul; 36(3):323-40. PubMed ID: 15950692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Adapting innovative motion-preserving technology to spinal surgical practice: what should we expect to happen?
Polly DW
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):S104-9. PubMed ID: 14560181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Foraminal stenosis and single-level degenerative disc disease: a randomized controlled trial comparing decompression with decompression and instrumented fusion.
Hallett A; Huntley JS; Gibson JN
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Jun; 32(13):1375-80. PubMed ID: 17545903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Indications for lumbar spine fusion in the adult.
Esses SI; Huler RJ
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1992 Jun; (279):87-100. PubMed ID: 1600675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biomechanics of nonfusion implants.
Huang RC; Wright TM; Panjabi MM; Lipman JD
Orthop Clin North Am; 2005 Jul; 36(3):271-80. PubMed ID: 15950687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Artificial disc replacement promises the end of spinal fusion technology].
Tian W
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2005 Jan; 85(1):9. PubMed ID: 15808065
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Cervical spine arthroplasty biomechanics.
Puttlitz CM; DiAngelo DJ
Neurosurg Clin N Am; 2005 Oct; 16(4):589-94, v. PubMed ID: 16326281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Spine-tingling prospects. Artificial disc implants are among the new technologies expected to revolutionize the outcomes of back surgery.
Becker C
Mod Healthc; 2003 Nov; 33(45):30-2. PubMed ID: 14666550
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
