These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15950690)

  • 21. Lumbar disc arthroplasty.
    Gamradt SC; Wang JC
    Spine J; 2005; 5(1):95-103. PubMed ID: 15653090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Results of the prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-C total disc replacement versus anterior discectomy and fusion for the treatment of 1-level symptomatic cervical disc disease.
    Murrey D; Janssen M; Delamarter R; Goldstein J; Zigler J; Tay B; Darden B
    Spine J; 2009 Apr; 9(4):275-86. PubMed ID: 18774751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The Bryan cervical disc system.
    Papadopoulos S
    Neurosurg Clin N Am; 2005 Oct; 16(4):629-36, vi. PubMed ID: 16326286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Analysis of the three United States Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption cervical arthroplasty trials.
    Upadhyaya CD; Wu JC; Trost G; Haid RW; Traynelis VC; Tay B; Coric D; Mummaneni PV
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Mar; 16(3):216-28. PubMed ID: 22195608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Arthroplasty in the military: a preliminary experience with ProDisc-C and ProDisc-L.
    Tumialán LM; Ponton RP; Garvin A; Gluf WM
    Neurosurg Focus; 2010 May; 28(5):E18. PubMed ID: 20568934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Mobility of lumbar segments instrumented with a ProDisc II prosthesis: a two-year follow-up study.
    Leivseth G; Braaten S; Frobin W; Brinckmann P
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Jul; 31(15):1726-33. PubMed ID: 16816770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Cervical kinematics after fusion and bryan disc arthroplasty.
    Sasso RC; Best NM
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Feb; 21(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 18418131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Revisability of the CHARITE artificial disc replacement: analysis of 688 patients enrolled in the U.S. IDE study of the CHARITE Artificial Disc.
    McAfee PC; Geisler FH; Saiedy SS; Moore SV; Regan JJ; Guyer RD; Blumenthal SL; Fedder IL; Tortolani PJ; Cunningham B
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 May; 31(11):1217-26. PubMed ID: 16688035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Lumbar total disc arthroplasty utilizing the ProDisc prosthesis in smokers versus nonsmokers: a prospective study with 2-year minimum follow-up.
    Bertagnoli R; Yue JJ; Kershaw T; Shah RV; Pfeiffer F; Fenk-Mayer A; Nanieva R; Karg A; Husted DS; Emerson JW
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Apr; 31(9):992-7. PubMed ID: 16641775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. SB Charité disc replacement: report of 60 prospective randomized cases in a US center.
    McAfee PC; Fedder IL; Saiedy S; Shucosky EM; Cunningham BW
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2003 Aug; 16(4):424-33. PubMed ID: 12902960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. ProDisc-L total disc replacement: a comparison of 1-level versus 2-level arthroplasty patients with a minimum 2-year follow-up.
    Hannibal M; Thomas DJ; Low J; Hsu KY; Zucherman J
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Oct; 32(21):2322-6. PubMed ID: 17906573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Clinical results of total lumbar disc replacement with ProDisc II: three-year results for different indications.
    Siepe CJ; Mayer HM; Wiechert K; Korge A
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Aug; 31(17):1923-32. PubMed ID: 16924209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Prospective, randomized trial of metal-on-metal artificial lumbar disc replacement: initial results for treatment of discogenic pain.
    Sasso RC; Foulk DM; Hahn M
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jan; 33(2):123-31. PubMed ID: 18197095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Prospective study of cervical arthroplasty in 98 patients involved in 1 of 3 separate investigational device exemption studies from a single investigational site with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Clinical article.
    Coric D; Cassis J; Carew JD; Boltes MO
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Dec; 13(6):715-21. PubMed ID: 21121748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Clinical results with ProDisc: European experience and U.S. investigation device exemption study.
    Zigler JE
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):S163-6. PubMed ID: 14560187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Lumbar disc arthroplasty with Maverick disc versus stand-alone interbody fusion: a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter investigational device exemption trial.
    Gornet MF; Burkus JK; Dryer RF; Peloza JH
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Dec; 36(25):E1600-11. PubMed ID: 21415812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Lumbar disc arthroplasty.
    Errico TJ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2005 Jun; (435):106-17. PubMed ID: 15930927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Lumbar spine arthroplasty using the ProDisc II.
    Zigler JE
    Spine J; 2004; 4(6 Suppl):260S-267S. PubMed ID: 15541675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The Prestige cervical disc.
    Traynelis VC
    Neurosurg Clin N Am; 2005 Oct; 16(4):621-8, vi. PubMed ID: 16326285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparative charge analysis of one- and two-level lumbar total disc arthroplasty versus circumferential lumbar fusion.
    Levin DA; Bendo JA; Quirno M; Errico T; Goldstein J; Spivak J
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Dec; 32(25):2905-9. PubMed ID: 18246016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.